UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrantx  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨
Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x
Definitive Proxy Statement

¨
Definitive Additional Materials

¨
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12Under Rule 14a-12

Owens & Minor, Inc.

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement,person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the Registrant)

registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x
No fee required.

¨
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 (1)

Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies:

 

     

 (2)

Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies:

 

     

 (3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of the transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

 (4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:

 

     

 (5)

Total fee paid:

 

     

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 (1)

Amount Previously Paid:previously paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No:

(3)

Filing party:

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 

 

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:


 

LOGOLOGO

Notice of

20152018

Annual Meeting

and

Proxy Statement

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PRESENTLY PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN

PERSON, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS URGES YOU TO VOTE.

Owens & Minor, Inc.

9120 Lockwood Boulevard

Mechanicsville, Virginia 23116

 


     LOGOLOGO
    

9120 Lockwood Boulevard

Mechanicsville, Virginia 23116

(804)723-7000

March 18, 201526, 2018

Dear Shareholders:

It is a pleasure to invite you to our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Thursday, April 30, 2015Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 10:9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at the corporate headquarters of Owens & Minor, Inc., 9120 Lockwood Boulevard, Mechanicsville,The Jefferson Hotel, Empire Room, 101 West Franklin Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23116.23220. Directions to our officesThe Jefferson Hotel are on the last page of the proxy statement.

The Notice of 20152018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement describe the items of business for the meeting. In addition to considering these matters, we will review significant accomplishments and events since our last shareholders’ meeting as well as future opportunities and initiatives we intend to pursue. Our Board of Directors and management team will be there to discuss items of interest and to answer any questions.

The Notice of 20152018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials and our 20142017 Annual Report/Form10-K over the Internet as well as how shareholders can receive paper copies of such documents, if they so desire.

You may vote your shares by the Internet or by telephone or, if you prefer, you may request paper copies of the proxy materials and submit your vote by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card. We encourage you to vote via the Internet. Whichever method you choose, your vote is important so please vote as soon as possible. All of us at Owens & Minor appreciate your continued interest and support.

Warm regards,

 

LOGOLOGO

CRAIG R. SMITH

Executive Chairman andP. CODY PHIPPS

Chairman, of the BoardPresident & Chief Executive Officer


Proxy Statement  

Table of Contents

  Page 

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

   i 

About the Meeting

   1 

Corporate Governance

   3 

Report of the Governance & Nominating Committee

   56 

Board Meetings

   67 

Committees of the Board

   67 

Director Compensation

   89 

Director Nominating Process

   1011 

Communications with the Board of Directors

   1011 

Proposal 1: Election Of Directors

   1112 

Nominees for Election

   1112

Retiring Directors

17 

Proposal 2: Approval of the Proposed Owens & Minor, Inc. 20152018 Stock Incentive Plan

   1618 

Proposal 3: Ratification Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   2228 

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   2228 

Report of the Audit Committee

   2329 

Stock Ownership Information

   2531 

Compliance with Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

   2531 

Stock Ownership by Management and the Board of Directors

   2531 

Stock Ownership by Certain Shareholders

   2632 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

   2632 

Executive Compensation

   2733 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

   2733 

Report of the Compensation & Benefits Committee

   4453 

Summary Compensation Table

   4554 

Grants of Plan Based Awards Table

   4856 

Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End Table

   5058 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

   5159 

Retirement Plans

   5159 

Pension Benefits Table

   5260 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

   5361 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

   5462 

Proposal 4: Advisory Shareholder Vote on Executive CompensationCEO Pay Ratio

   5866

Proposal 4: Advisory Shareholder Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

67 

Certain Relationships and Transactions

   5867 

Shareholder Proposals

   5967 

Other Matters

   6069 

Appendix A — Proposed Owens & Minor, Inc. 20152018 Stock Incentive Plan

   A-1

Appendix B — Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures for Services by Independent Auditors

B-1 

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please vote your shares promptly, as instructed in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, by the Internet or by telephone. You may also request a paper proxy card to submit your vote by mail, if you prefer. We encourage you to vote via the Internet.


 

LOGOLOGO

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To Be Held Thursday, April 30, 2015Tuesday, May 8, 2018

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF OWENS & MINOR, INC.:

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Owens & Minor, Inc. (the “Company” or “Owens & Minor”) will be held on Thursday, April 30, 2015Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 10:9:00 a.m. EDT at the offices of Owens & Minor, 9120 Lockwood Boulevard, Mechanicsville, Virginia.The Jefferson Hotel, Empire Room, 101 West Franklin Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23220.

The purposes of the meeting are:

 

 1.To elect the eleven10 directors named in the attached proxy statement, each for aone-year term and until their respective successors are elected and qualified;

 

 2.To approve the proposed 2015 Owens & Minor, Inc. 2018 Stock Incentive Plan;

 

 3.To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2015;2018;

 

 4.To conduct an advisory vote onto approve the compensation of ourthe Company’s named executive officers; and

 

 5.To transact any other business properly before the annual meeting.

Shareholders of record as of March 5, 201513, 2018 will be entitled to vote at the annual meeting.

Your attention is directed to the attached proxy statement. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is being distributed on or about March 18, 2015.26, 2018. This proxy statement, the proxy card and Owens & Minor’s 20142017 AnnualReport/Form10-K are being furnished on the Internet on or about March 18, 2015.26, 2018.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

LOGO

GNRACEICHOLAS R.J. PDEN HARTOGACE

SeniorExecutive Vice President, General Counsel,

& Corporate Secretary

 & Communications

 

i


 

LOGOLOGO

 

Street Address

  

Mailing Address

9120 Lockwood Boulevard  

P.O. Box 27626

Mechanicsville, Virginia 23116  

Richmond, Virginia 23261-7626

PROXY STATEMENT

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

to be held on April 30, 2015May 8, 2018

ABOUT THE MEETING

What You Are Voting On

Proxies are being solicited by the Board of Directors for purposes of voting on the following proposals and any other business properly brought before the meeting:

 

Proposal 1:Election of the eleven10 directors named in this proxy statement, each for aone-year term and until their respective successors are elected and qualified.

 

Proposal 2:Approval of the proposed Owens & Minor, Inc. 20152018 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

Proposal 3:Ratification of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2015.2018.

 

Proposal 4:Advisory vote onto approve the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”).officers.

Who is Entitled to Vote

Shareholders of Owens & Minor, Inc. (the “Company” or “Owens & Minor”) as of the close of business on March 5, 201513, 2018 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to vote. Each share of the Company’s common stock (“Common Stock”) is entitled to one vote.vote with respect to each matter to be voted upon at the meeting. As of March 5, 2015, 63,134,43913, 2018, 61,822,277 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding.

How to Vote

You can vote byvia the Internet, by telephone or by mail.

By Internet.    You may vote byvia the Internet by following the specific instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. Shareholders who have requested a paper copy of a proxy card by mail may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card. We encourage you to vote via the Internet. If your shares are held by your bank or broker in street name, please refer to the instruction form that you receive from your bank or broker or contact your bank or broker to determine whether you will be able to vote byvia the Internet.

By Telephone.    You may vote by telephone by calling the toll-free number on the proxy card and following the instructions. Shareholders will need to have the control number that appears on their notice available when voting. If your shares are held by your bank or broker in street name, please refer to the instruction form that you receive from your bank or broker or contact your bank or broker to determine whether you will be able to vote by telephone.

By Mail.    Shareholders who have requested a paper copy of a proxy card by mail may submit proxies by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and returning it in the postage-paid envelope provided.

However you choose to vote, you may revoke a proxy prior to the meeting by (1) submitting a subsequently dated proxy by any of the methods described above, (2) giving notice in writing to the Corporate Secretary of the Company or (3) voting in person at the meeting (attendance at the meeting will not itself revoke a proxy).

What Happens if You Do Not Make Selections on Your Proxy

If your proxy contains specific voting instructions, those instructions will be followed. However, if you sign and return your proxy card by mail or submit your proxy by telephone or via the Internet without making a selection on one or more proposals, you give authority to the individuals designated on the proxy card to vote on the proposal(s) for which you have not made specific selections or given instructions and any other matter that may arise at the meeting. If no specific selection is made or instructions given, it is intended that all proxies that are signed and returned or submitted via telephone or Internet will be voted “FOR” the election of all nominees for director, FOR”“FOR” approval of the 20152018 Stock Incentive Plan, “FOR” the ratification of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm in 2015,2018 and “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our NEOs.named executive officers (together, the “NEOs,” and, individually, an “NEO”).

Whether Your Shares Will be Voted if You Don’t Provide Your Proxy

Whether your shares will be voted if you do not provide your proxy depends on how your ownership of shares of Common Stock is registered. If you own your shares as a registered holder, which means that your shares of Common Stock are registered in your name, and you do not provide your proxy, your shares will not be represented at the meeting, will not count toward the quorum requirement, which is explained below, and will not be voted.

If you own your shares of Common Stock in street name, your shares may be voted even if you do not provide your broker with voting instructions. Brokers have the authority under New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules to vote shares for which their beneficial owner customers do not provide voting instructions on certain “routine” matters. When a proposal is not a routine matter and the brokerage firm has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares with respect to that proposal, the brokerage firm cannot vote the shares on that proposal. This is called a brokernon-vote.

The Company believes that only the proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 20152018 is a routine matter for which brokerage firms will have discretionary voting power if you do not give voting instructions with respect to this proposal. The proposal to elect directors, the proposal to approve the 20152018 Stock Incentive Plan, as well asand the proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs, arenon-routine matters for which brokerage firms will not have discretionary voting power and for which specific voting instructions from their customers are required. As a result, brokerage firms will not be allowed to vote on thesenon-routine matters on behalf of their customers if the customers do not return specific voting instructions.

What Constitutes a Quorum

A majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock present or represented by proxy constitutes a quorum. A quorum is required to conduct the annual meeting. If you vote your proxy, you will be considered part of the quorum. Abstentions and shares held by brokers or banks in street name (“broker shares”) that are voted on any matter are included in the quorum. Broker shares that are not voted on any matter will not be included in determining whether a quorum is present.

The Vote Required to Approve Each Item

Election of Directors.    The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting is required for the election of each director. A majority of votes cast means that the number of votes cast “FOR” a nominee’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “AGAINST” that nominee’s election. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the results of this vote.

Approval of 20152018 Stock Incentive Plan.    ApprovalThe approval of the 20152018 Stock Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal. Abstentions will be considered as votes cast under the rules of the NYSE and will have the effect of a vote against this proposal for purposes of the rules of the NYSE. Brokernon-votes will not be counted as votes cast on this proposal and will have no effect on the results of this vote.

Ratification of Appointment of KPMG LLP.    The appointment of KPMG LLP will be ratified if the votes cast “FOR” this proposal exceed the number of votes cast “AGAINST” this proposal. Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast on this proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of this vote. There should be no brokernon-votes because this is considered a routine matter under the rules of the NYSE.

Advisory Vote onto Approve Executive Compensation.    The compensation of our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table will be approved on an advisory basis if the votes cast “FOR” this proposal exceed the number of votes cast “AGAINST” this proposal. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted as votes cast on this proposal and will have no effect on the results of this vote.

How to Obtain a Paper Copy of the Proxy Materials

Shareholders will find instructions about how to obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials on the notice they received in the mail about the Internet availability of proxy materials.

What it Means if You Get More Than One Notice about the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

Your shares are probably registered differently or are held in more than one account. Please vote all proxies to ensure that all your shares are voted. Also, please have all of your accounts registered in the same name and address. You may do this by contacting our transfer agent, Computershare, Shareowner Service, LLC,Inc., at 1-866-

252-0358.1-866-252-0358.

Costs of Soliciting Proxies

Owens & Minor will pay all costs of this proxy solicitation. The Company has retained Georgeson, Inc.LLC to aid in the distribution and solicitation of proxies for approximately $6,000 plus expenses. The Company will reimburse brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their expenses in forwarding proxy and solicitation materials.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

General.    General.    The Company is managed under the direction of the Board of Directors, which has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to set forth certain corporate governance practices. Each year, we review our corporate governance policies and practices relative to applicable laws, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules and regulations promulgated thereunder or adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the NYSE, the exchange on which the Common Stock is listed, as well as the policies and practices recommended by groups and authorities active in corporate governance.

Corporate Governance Materials.    Materials.    The Company’s Bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Honor and the charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation & Benefits Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), and the Governance & Nominating CommitteesCommittee are

available on our website athttp://www.owens-minor.com under “Corporate Governance.”Governance” in the “Investor Relations” tab. The information available on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement.

Code of Honor.    Honor.    The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Honor that is applicable to all employees of the Company, including the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer and the principal accounting officer, as well as the members of the Board of Directors. We intend to post any amendments to or waivers from our Code of Honor (to the extent applicable to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, any other executive officer or any director) on our website.website http://www.owens-minor.com under “Corporate Governance” in the “Investor Relations” tab.

Director Independence.    Independence.    The Board of Directors has determined that the following Board members and/or nominees are “independent” within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines: Stuart M. Essig, John W. Gerdelman, Barbara B. Hill, Lemuel E. Lewis, Martha H. Marsh, Mark F. McGettrick, Eddie N. Moore, Jr., James E. Rogers, David S. Simmons, Robert C. Sledd and Anne Marie Whittemore. To assist it in making determinations of independence, the Board has adopted categorical standards which are included in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines available on our website at http://www.owens-minor.com under “Corporate Governance.”Governance” in the “Investor Relations” tab. The Board has determined that all directors and/or nominees identified as independent in this proxy statement meet these standards.

Structure and Leadership of the Board.The Board of Directors has nodoes not have a firm policy with respect to the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer. Instead, the Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Company for this determination to be made as part of the succession planning process when it selects a new Chief Executive Officer. The Board selected Craig R. Smith, ourOfficer or when a Chairman ceases his or her service on the Board. At the time of Mr. Phipps’ commencement as Chief Executive Officer until he stepped down effective September 1, 2014, to also serveof the Company, the Board believed that maintaining anon-executive as Chairman of the Board. This decisionBoard was based onin the Board’s desire to preservebest interests of the Company because it preserved continuity in the operationBoard’s performance of its duties, assisted in the transition of Mr. Phipps to the Chief Executive Officer position and management of the succession plan and provided a strong source of institutional knowledge and history of operations of the Company. In 2017, thenon-executive Chairman notified the Board that he would retire and not stand forre-election to our Board. In connection therewith, the pursuitBoard evaluated the separation of ourthe offices of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. As part of that evaluation, the Board determined that, based on Mr. Phipps’ then18-plus months of Board service and his performance and leadership as the Chief Executive Officer through a period of strategic goalstransformation and our unique corporate culture. repositioning of the Company, it would be in the best interest of the Company to have Mr. Phipps serve as Chairman.

The Board believes that the rolecombination of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles also currently serves the best interests of the Company for the following reasons:

this structure results in the most effective leadership to help the Board discharge its oversight duties during a period of transformation and repositioning of the Company;

the Chief Executive Officer is well situated to identify the key risks facing our organization and the success of its independent lead director preservestransformation and maintainsrepositioning, and ensure that these risks are brought to the appropriate levelattention of Board independence, consistentthe Board; and

having one leader serving as both the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer provides decisive leadership while reducing the likelihood of confusion about leadership roles and duplication of efforts, and allows the Company to speak with corporate governance best practices. The Company’sa unified voice.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide for the annual election of an independent lead director by ournon-management directors to, among other things, preside at Board meetings in the absence of the Chairman, preside at meetings of the independent directors, serve as the principal liaison on behalf ofbetween the independent directors and advise the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and advise the board committee chairmenChairman with respect to agendas and information requirements relating to the Board and committee meetings. The Board believes that the independent lead director enhances communications between boardBoard members (including the Chairman) and committees as well as the overall functioning of the Board’s leadership.

Majority Vote Requirement for Election of Directors.    The Board of Directors amended the Company’s Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines in February 2015 to provide for the election of directors by majority rather than plurality, vote in uncontested elections. The majority vote requirement will be in effect for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, with respect to director nominations, the Board will only nominate those incumbent directors who submit irrevocable resignations effective upon the failure of such director nominee to receive the required vote forre-election and Board’s acceptance of such resignation. In the event an incumbent director fails to receive a majority of the votes cast, the Governance & Nominating Committee (or such other committee designated by the Board) will make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the resignation. The Board must act on the resignation, taking into account the Governance & Nominating Committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision regarding the resignation, including, if applicable, its rationale for rejecting a resignation, in a press release and an appropriate disclosure with the SEC within 90 days following certification of the election results. The Governance & Nominating Committee in making its recommendation, and the Board in making its decision, may each consider any factors or other information that it considers appropriate and relevant.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight.    Oversight.    The Board of Directors currently administers its risk oversight function through the full Board and not through a separate risk committee of the Board. However, each of the

Audit Committee, the Compensation & Benefits Committee and the Governance & Nominating Committee oversees the specific financial, compensation and governance risks, respectively, relating to its functions and responsibilities and reports on these matters to the full Board. The Board performs its risk oversight function through regular reporting by the Board committees as well as the officers and management-level personnel who supervise theday-to-day risk management activities of the Company, including an enterprise risk steering committee comprised of senior leaders of the Company.

Risk Assessment of Compensation Programs.    With respect to our overall compensation programs, Company management has reviewedreviews our compensation policies and practices each year to determine whether they create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. As part of this assessment and with assistance and guidance provided by independent compensation consultant Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC (“Semler Brossy”), we reviewed the design and features of our compensation and benefits programs and policies, potential risks that could be created by these programs and features of our programs and corporate governance policies that help to mitigate risk. ManagementSemler Brossy reviewed and discussed the results of the assessment with the Compensation & Benefits Committee. Based on this review and assessment, we believe that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Annual Performance Evaluation.The Board conducts an annual self-evaluation to determine whether it and its committees are functioning effectively. The Governance & Nominating Committee receives comments from all directors and reports annually to the Board with an assessment of the Board’s performance. The assessment focuses on the Board’s contribution to the Company and specifically focuses on areas in which the Board or management believes that the Board can improve.

REPORT OF THE GOVERNANCE & NOMINATING COMMITTEE

The Governance & Nominating Committee is composed of five directors, all of whom are independent. The Governance & Nominating Committee met four times during 2014, in which considerable time2017. In performing the various duties and attention was devoted to executive succession planning as Mr. Smith transitioned from Chief Executive Officer to Executive Chairman and Mr. Bierman was appointed to the role of President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective September 1, 2014. During 2014, the Committee also addressed several corporate governance matters, including the decision to allow the existing shareholders rights plan to lapse upon expiration in April 2014 without replacement. At the recommendation of the Governance & Nominating Committee, the Board amended the Company’s Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines to provide for the election of directors by majority vote in uncontested elections. Following the election of directors at the Annual Meeting, upon the recommendation of the Committee, the Board appointed new committee chairs and Lead Director and rotated committee memberships. The Committee also adopted a new approach to the 2014 Board self-assessment process with the engagement of an independent outside board consultant. The consultant interviewed all directors to identify strengths and weaknesses and opportunities for improvement of board and board committee structure and function, followed by an executive session with the Board to discuss the results of the assessment. As providedresponsibilities outlined in its charter, the Governance & Nominating Committee, reviewed and approved the Committee’s charter andamong other things, received regular reports on the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines;enterprise quality and regulatory compliance; reviewed the performance of the Chief Executive Officer;chief executive officer; reviewed and approved its charter and the Corporate Governance Guidelines; engaged an outside compensation firm to review and assess the Company’s director compensation program relative to comparable peer companies; and implemented the annual Board assessment process. During 2017, the Committee reviewed withand recommended for Board approval several changes in the executive management team as presented by the Chief Executive Officer proposed organization changes and relateddevoted time to management promotions, as well as succession plans for membersplanning, including the review and approval of senior management.updates to the CEO emergency replacement plan. In anticipation of the retirement of several directors over the next several years, the Committee devoted considerable time and attention to director succession planning, including the continued engagement of an outside consulting firm to assist in the identification and strategic recruitment of directors possessing the qualities, character, experience and expertise that will contribute to the leadership and success of the Company in the rapidly changing healthcare industry.

THE GOVERNANCE & NOMINATING

COMMITTEE

Martha H. Marsh, Chairman

Stuart M. Essig

Lemuel E. Lewis

Eddie N. Moore, Jr.

James E. Rogers

Robert C. Sledd

BOARD MEETINGS

The Board of Directors held eleven15 meetings during 2014.2017. All directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and committees on which they served. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that, absent unusual or unforeseen circumstances,Our directors are expected to attend eachour annual meeting of shareholders.shareholders unless there is compelling reason why they cannot. All of our directors, with the exception of Mr. Moore, attended the 2014our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the independent directors meet in executive session after each regularly scheduled Board meeting. These meetings are chaired by aour lead director who is elected annually by thenon-management directors following each annual meeting of shareholders. Anne Marie Whittemore was appointed in 2014 to servecurrently serves as lead director and presidepresides over these executive sessions. As lead director, Ms. Whittemore is also invited to participate in meetings of all Board committees but is permitted to vote only in meetings of committees of which she is a member. Shareholders and other interested parties may contact the lead director by following the procedures set forth in “Communications with the Board of Directors” on page 1011 of this proxy statement.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

The Board of Directors currently has the following committees, which the Board established to assist it with its responsibilities:

Audit Committee:    Oversees (i) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, (ii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (iii) the qualification and independence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, (iv) the performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit functions and (v) issues involving the Company’s ethical and legal compliance responsibilities. The Audit Committee has sole authority to appoint, retain, compensate, evaluate and terminate the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Board of Directors has determined that each of Lemuel E. Lewis and Eddie N. Moore, Jr. is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by SEC regulations and that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate under NYSE listing standards. All members of the Audit Committee are independent as such term is defined under the enhanced independence standards for audit committees in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the rules thereunder as incorporated into the NYSE listing standards and under the Company’s corporate governance guidelines.Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Compensation & Benefits Committee:    Administers executive compensation programs, policies and practices. Advises the Board on salaries and compensation of the executive officers and makes other studies and recommendations concerning compensation and compensation policies. May delegate authority forday-to-day administration and interpretation of compensation plans to certain senior officers of the Company (other than for matters affecting executive officer compensation and benefits). For further information on this committee’s processes and procedures, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 2733 of this proxy statement. All members of the Compensation & Benefits Committee are independent within the meaning of the enhanced NYSE listing standards and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Compensation Committee met 6 times during 2017.

Governance & Nominating Committee:    Considers and recommends nominees for election as directors and officers and nominees for each Board committee. Reviews and recommends changes to director compensation. Reviews and evaluates the procedures, practices and policies of the Board and its members and leads the Board in its annual self-review. Oversees the governance of the Company, including reviewing and recommending changes to the Corporate Governance Guidelines. Conducts succession planning for senior management. All members of the Governance & Nominating Committee are independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Executive Committee:    Exercises limited powers of the Board when the Board is not in session. The Executive Committee did not meet during 2017.

The Company has previously had a Strategic Planning Committee whose purpose was to review and makes recommendations for the strategic direction of the Company and conduct an annual strategic planning retreat for the Board of Directors and senior management. However, we decided to eliminate the Strategic Planning Committee during 2014 since the full board typically performs the strategic planning function for the Company.

BOARD COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP

 

Director Board Audit 

Compensation &

Benefits

 Executive Governance &
Nominating
 

Strategic

Planning

 Board  Audit 

 Compensation & 

Benefits

 Executive Governance  &
Nominating

James L. Bierman

 X     X   X

P. Cody Phipps*

X*X*

Stuart M. Essig

 X   X     XXX

John W. Gerdelman

 X X       X*XX

Barbara B. Hill

XX

Lemuel E. Lewis

 X X*   X X  XX*XX

Martha H. Marsh

 X   X X X* XXXXX*

Mark F. McGettrick**

X

Eddie N. Moore, Jr.

 X X     X  XXX

James E. Rogers

 X   X X X X

David S. Simmons

 X X       X

James E. Rogers***

XXX

David S. Simmons***

XX

Robert C. Sledd

 X   X* X X  XXX*X

Craig R. Smith

 X*     X*   X

Anne Marie Whittemore

 X     X    XX

No. of meetings in 2014

 11 6 5 1 4 1

No. of meetings in 2017

157604

*Chairman

**Mr. McGettrick was appointed to the Board on March 1, 2018.

***Mr. Rogers and Mr. Simmons have notified the Board of Directors that they are not standing forre-election at the annual meeting.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The Governance & Nominating Committee reviews director compensation annually, and it is the responsibility of this committee to recommend to the Board of Directors any changes in director compensation. The Board of Directors makes the final determination with respect to director compensation. The Governance & Nominating Committee has the authority under its charter to retain outside consultants or advisors to assist it in gathering information and making decisions. In 2014, based upon a review of competitive market practices, the Governance & Nominating Committee increased the annual cash retainer paid to non-employee directors from $30,000 to $35,000 and increased the annual equity retainer granted to non-employee directors from $90,000 to $100,000. In addition, the cash retainer paid to our lead director increased from $30,000 to $35,000.

The Company uses a combination of cash and equity compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on its Board of Directors. In setting director compensation, the Company considers the commitment of time directors must make in performing their duties, the level of skills required by the Company of its Board members and the market competitiveness of its director compensation levels. The table below sets forth the schedule of fees paid tonon-employee directors for their annual retainer and service in various capacities on Board committees and in Board leadership roles. Employee directors do not receive any additional compensation other than their normal salary for serving on the Board or any of its committees.

Schedule of Director Fees

 

Type of Fee  Cash   Equity 

Annual Retainer

  $35,000    $100,000(1) 

Additional Retainer for Lead Director

   35,000       

Additional Retainer for Audit Committee Chair

   10,000       

Additional Retainer for Compensation & Benefits Committee Chair

   10,000       

Additional Retainer for Governance & Nominating Committee Chair

   9,000       

Additional Retainer for Other Committee Chairs

   8,000       

Board or Audit Committee Attendance Fee (per meeting)

   2,000       

Compensation & Benefits Committee Attendance Fee

   1,800       

Other Committee Attendance Fee (per meeting)

   1,500       

Board or Committee Telephone Conference (per meeting, other than Audit Committee)

   1,000       

Audit Committee Telephone Conference (per meeting)

   1,200       

Board Retreat (annual 2-day meeting)

   3,000       
Type of Fee Cash  Equity 

Annual Retainer

 $35,000  $100,000(1) 

Additional Annual Retainer for Lead Director

  35,000   N/A

Additional Annual Retainer for Audit Committee Chair

  10,000   N/A

Additional Annual Retainer for Compensation Committee Chair

  10,000   N/A

Additional Annual Retainer for Governance & Nominating Committee Chair

  9,000   N/A

Additional Annual Retainer for Other Committee Chairs

  8,000   N/A

Board or Audit Committee Attendance Fee (per meeting)

  2,000   N/A

Compensation Committee Attendance Fee (per meeting)

  1,800   N/A

Other Committee Attendance Fee (per meeting)

  1,500   N/A

Board or Committee Telephone Conference Attendance Fee (per meeting, other than Audit Committee)

  1,000   N/A

Audit Committee Telephone Conference Attendance Fee (per meeting)

  1,200   N/A

Board Strategy Retreat Attendance Fee (annual2-day meeting)

  3,000   N/A

(1) Restricted stock grant withone-year vesting period.

Directors may defer the receipt of all or part of their director fees under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts deferred are “invested” in bookkeeping accounts that measure earnings and losses based on the performance of a particular investment. Directors may elect to defer their fees into the following two subaccounts: (i) an account based upon the price of the Common Stock and (ii) an account based upon the current interest rate of the Company’s fixed income fund in its 401(k) plan. Subject to certain restrictions, a director may take cash distributions from a deferred fee account either prior to or following the termination of his or her service as a director.

Director Compensation Table

The table below summarizes the actual compensation paid by the Company tonon-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.

 

(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h) (b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)
Name 

Fees Earned
or Paid

in Cash

($) (1)

  Stock
Awards
($) (1)(2)(4)
  Option
Awards
($) (3)(4)
  

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation

($)

  

Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($)

  All Other
Compensation
($)
  

Total

($)

 

Fees Earned
or Paid

in Cash

($) (1)

Stock
Awards
($) (1)(2)(4)
Option
Awards
($) (3)

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation

($)

Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($)

All Other
Compensation
($)

Total

($)

Stuart M. Essig

  66,700    100,000    0    —      —      —      166,700   64,900 100,000 —   —   —   —   164,900

Richard E. Fogg (5)

  11,900    0    0    —      —      —      11,900  

John W. Gerdelman

  78,900    100,000    0    —      —      —      178,900   70,400 100,000 —   —   —   —   170,400

Barbara B. Hill

 72,150 125,000 —   —   —   —   197,150

Lemuel E. Lewis

  85,400    100,000    0    —      —      —      185,400   87,400 100,000 —   —   —   —   187,400

Martha H. Marsh

  82,000    100,000    0    —      —      —      182,000   84,000 100,000 —   —   —   —   184,000

Mark F. McGettrick (5)

 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Eddie N. Moore, Jr.

  75,400    100,000    0    —      —      —      175,400   76,400 100,000 —   —   —   —   176,400

James E. Rogers

  67,700    100,000    0    —      —      —      167,700   75,000 100,000 —   —   —   —   175,000

David S. Simmons

  68,500    100,000    0    —      —      —      168,500   65,200 100,000 —   —   —   —   165,200

Robert C. Sledd

  80,700    100,000    0    —      —      —      180,700   89,000 100,000 —   —   —   —   189,000

Craig R. Smith

 44,500 N/A —   —   —   —   44,500

Anne Marie Whittemore

  100,600    100,000    0    —      —      —      200,600   94,000 100,000 —   —   —   —   194,000

(1) Includes amounts deferred by the directors under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.

(2) The amounts included in the “Stock Awards” column are the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 718.

(3) “Option Awards”Option Awards were not granted to Directors in 2014.2017.

(4) AsThe Stock Award amount of December 31, 2014, each director had$100,000 equated to 3,050 shares of Restricted Stock based on the following numberclosing stock price of stock awards and option awards outstanding:$32.79 on May 5, 2017, the date of grant. These shares vest on May 5, 2018. Upon her appointment to the Board on February 9, 2017, Ms. Hill received a Stock Award in the amount of $25,000 which equated to 696 shares of Restricted Stock based on the closing price of $35.91 on that date. These shares vested on February 9, 2018. Mr. Smith did not receive a Stock Award during 2017.

   Stock Awards   Option Awards 

Mr. Essig

   3,014     —      

Mr. Fogg

   0     —      

Mr. Gerdelman

   3,014     —      

Mr. Lewis

   3,014     —      

Ms Marsh

   3,014     —      

Mr. Moore

   3,014     —      

Mr. Rogers

   3,014     15,000  

Mr. Simmons

   3,014     —      

Mr. Sledd

   3,014     —      

Ms. Whittemore

   3,014     —      

(5) Mr. Fogg retired fromMcGettrick was appointed to the Board of Directors aton March 1, 2018 and therefore did not receive compensation during the 2014 Annual Meeting.year ended December 31, 2017.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors

The Company maintains stock ownership guidelines for its directors which provide that each director shall attain, within five years after his or her service on the Board begins, a level of equity ownership of Common Stock having a value of at least five times the annual cash retainer fee or $150,000, whichever is higher. Each director who has served on the Board for at least five years has achieved this ownership objective.

DIRECTOR NOMINATING PROCESS

Director Candidate Recommendations and Nominations by Shareholders.The Governance & Nominating Committee charter provides that the Governance & Nominating Committee will consider director candidate recommendations by shareholders. Shareholders should submit any such recommendations to the Governance & Nominating Committee through the method described under “Communications with the Board of Directors” below. In addition, our Bylaws provide that any shareholder of record entitled to vote for the election of directors at the applicable meeting of shareholders may nominate directors by complying with the notice procedures set forth in the Bylaws and summarized in “Shareholder Proposals” on page 5967 of this proxy statement.

Process for Identifying and Evaluating Director Candidates.The Governance & Nominating Committee evaluates all director candidates in accordance with the director qualification standards and the criteria described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. These guidelines require the Governance & Nominating Committee on an annual basis to review and evaluate the requisite skills and characteristics of individual Board members and nominees as well as the composition of the Board as a whole. This assessment includes whether the member or candidate is independent and includes considerations of diversity, age, skills and experience in the context of the Board’s needs. The goal of the Governance & Nominating Committee is to have a Board whose membership reflects a mix of diverse skill sets, technical expertise, educational and professional backgrounds, industry experiences and public service as well as perspectives of different genders and ethnicities. The Governance & Nominating Committee reviews its annual assessment with the Board each year and, as new member candidates are sought, attempts to maintain and enhance the level of diverse backgrounds and viewpoints of directors constituting the Board. As part of the Board’s annual self-assessment process, the Board will consider the effectiveness of its overall composition and structure as well as its performance and functioning.

Our Bylaws provide that no director nominee can stand for election if, at the time of appointment or election, the nominee is over the age of 72. There are no differences in the manner in which the Governance & Nominating Committee evaluates director candidates based on whether the candidate is recommended by a shareholder. The Governance & Nominating Committee did not receive any nominations from any shareholders for the 20152018 Annual Meeting.

Our Bylaws provide that no director nominee can stand for election if, at the time of appointment or election, the nominee is over the age of 72.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors has approved a process for shareholders and other interested parties to send communications to the Board. Shareholders and other interested parties can send written communications to the Board, any committee of the Board,non-management directors as a group, the lead director or any other individual director at the following address: P.O. Box 26383, Richmond, Virginia 23260.2076, Mechanicsville, VA 23116-2076. All communications will be relayed directly to the applicable director(s).

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

ElevenTen directors arehave been nominated for election to the Board of Directors for aone-year term expiring at the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their respective successors are elected. Each nominee has agreed to serve if elected and qualified. If any nominee is not able to serve, the Board may designate a substitute or reduce the number of directors serving on the Board. Proxies will be voted for the nominees shown below (or if not able to serve, such substitutes as may be designated by the Board). The Board has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable to serve.

Our Bylaws currently provide that the Board of Directors shall consistconsists of eleven directors.12 directors and the Board has approved an amendment to our Bylaws to decrease the number of directors to 10 effective upon Messrs. Rogers and Simmons’ retirement from the Board effective upon the 2018 Annual Meeting. The Governance & Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors has approved, eleven10 persons as nominees for election to the Board of Directors. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of directors than the number of nominees named.

Information on each nominee, including the particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Board to conclude that he or she should serve as a director of the Company, is set forth below.

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION

 

  

LOGO

James L. Bierman, 62, has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Owens & Minor since September 2014. He served as President and Chief Operating Officer from 2013 to 2014 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 2012 to 2013. From 2007 to 2012, he served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. He previously held senior positions at Quintiles Transnational and was a 22-year veteran of Arthur Andersen where he was a partner for 10 years. Mr. Bierman currently serves on the board of directors of TeamHealth Holdings, Inc. where he is chairman of the board’s audit and governance and nominating committees. Mr. Bierman was appointed as a director of the Company in September 2014.

The Board of Directors has nominated Mr. Bierman to serve as a director of the Company based on his position as Chief Executive Officer and his unique ability to communicate to and inform the Board about the Company’s day-to-day operations and management issues as well as industry developments. The Board believes that Mr. Bierman brings an invaluable perspective on the Company’s historical and current operations and its ongoing relationships with customers and suppliers.

LOGOLOGO

  

Stuart M. Essig, 53,56, has served as Chairman of the Board of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation since 2012. From 1997 to 2012, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Integra LifeSciences, during which time he transitioned the business into a global surgical products company. Prior to joining Integra LifeSciences, Mr. Essig was a managing director in mergers and acquisitions for Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. He also has been a Managing Partner since 2012 of Prettybrook Partners, a healthcare advisory firm, and a Venture Partner since 2013 in Wellington Partners, a pan-European venture capital firm. In addition to Integra LifeSciences, he also currently serves on the boards of directors of IDEXX Laboratories, Seaspine Holdings Corporation and Breg, Inc. and formerly served on the boards of St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Breg, Inc.ZimmerBiomet. Mr. Essig has been a director of the Company since 2013.

 

The Board of Directors has nominated Mr. Essig to continue his service as a director of the Company based on his strong background and leadership experience in the medical device manufacturing industry and broad-based knowledge of the health care industry. His insights into the medical supplies manufacturing industry, both domestic and international, bring a unique perspective to Owens & Minor’s boardBoard that assists us both logistically and strategically as we seek to manage and grow our many relationships with the manufacturing community at home and abroad.

  

LOGOLOGO

  

John W. Gerdelman,, 62, 65, is Managing Partner of River2, an investment and consulting partnership. Mr. Gerdelman was President of Long Lines Limited, a telecommunications service provider, from 2010 to 2011. Before joining Long Lines in 2010, heco-founded Intelliden Corporation, a network solutions provider for which Mr. Gerdelman served as Executive Chairman from 2003 until it was acquired by IBM in 2010. Mr. Gerdelman has served in a number of leadership positions for other telecommunications companies, including 15 years with MCI Communications Corporation. He currently serves on the board of directors of Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. and previously served on the boards of Sycamore Networks, Inc., Proxim Wireless Corporation, APAC Customer Services, Inc. and McData Corporation. Mr. Gerdelman has been a director of the Company since 2010.

 

The Board of Directors has nominated Mr. Gerdelman to continue his service as a director of the Company based on his unique entrepreneurial background, extensive experience in finance and accounting and expertise in telecommunications and information systems. The Board believes the Company will benefitbenefits from Mr. Gerdelman’s business management experience and perspectives as Owens & Minor continues to expand systems and technology solutions used to support our own business operations as well as to provide customers with new products for supply chain management.

LOGO

Barbara B. Hill, 65, has served as an Operating Partner of NexPhase Capital, a private equity firm (formerly Moelis Capital Partners), since 2011, where she focuses on healthcare-related investments and providing strategic and operating support for NexPhase’s healthcare portfolio companies. From 2006 to 2010, Ms. Hill served as Chief Executive Officer and President of FHC Health Systems and ValueOptions, Inc., a behavioral health benefits management company. Previously, Ms. Hill served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Woodhaven Health Services, an institutional pharmacy company, from 2004 to 2006, and President and a member of the board of directors of Express Scripts, a Fortune 100 pharmacy benefits management company, from 2002 to 2003. Ms. Hill also serves as a member of the board of directors of Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., a Maryland real estate investment trust, Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, a manufacturer of medical devices and implants and formerly served on the board of St. Jude Medical, Inc. Ms. Hill has been a director of the Company since February 2017.

The Board of Directors has nominated Ms. Hill to continue her service as a director of the Company based on her extensive experience in the healthcare industry. Ms. Hill brings deep management experience and insight both generally and specific to the healthcare industry, including unique strategic and operational experience from the managed healthcare and pharmaceutical industries. Her unique perspective will benefit Owens & Minor as it continues to expand as a full-service partner for customers that focus on global healthcare solutions and understand the challenges faced at multiple levels within the global healthcare marketplace.

  

LOGOLOGO

  

Lemuel E. Lewis, 68,71, is Presidenta former Chairman of LocalWeather.com,the Board of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, a web-based privately-held media companyposition he foundedheld from 2009 until his retirement from the board on December 31, 2010. Mr. Lewis was appointed to the Board of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond in 2004 and served as Deputy Chairman from 2007 to 2008, and Chairman of the Audit Committee from 2005 to 2008. He previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Landmark Communications, Inc., a privately-held media and broadcasting company, from 2000 to 2006. Mr. Lewis was appointed to the Board of the Federal Reserve Bank in 2004 and served as Deputy Chairman from 2007 to 2008, Chairman of the Audit Committee from 2005 to 2008, and Chairman from 2009 until his retirement from the board on December 31, 2010. He currently serves on the board of directors of Markel Corporation where he is Chairman of the Audit Committee. He also serves on the board of directors of Dollar Tree, Inc. and previously served on the board of Landmark Communications, Inc. Mr. Lewis has been a director of the Company since 2011.

 

The Board of Directors has nominated Mr. Lewis to continue his service as a director of the Company based on his breadth of experience in accounting and finance through his service as Chief Financial Officer of a private media company, as well as his service on the Board of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond where he chaired the Audit Committee. He also brings a wide range of differing perspectives to the Company based on his service on a number of Virginia college and foundation boards and through his membership on the boards of two other public companies, including service on their audit committees.

    
  

LOGO

  

Martha H. Marsh, 66,69, retired in 2010 as President & Chief Executive Officer of Stanford Hospital & Clinics, a position she held since 2002. She also served as the Chief Executive Officer of the University of California Davis Health System from 1999 to 2002. After beginning her career at Arthur Andersen in 1975, she served the health care industry for more than thirty years in a variety of leadership positions, including as Senior Vice President for Professional Services and Managed Care at the University of Pennsylvania Health System. Ms. Marsh has also served on a variety of health care boards and committees. She currently serves on the boards of directors of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and Edward Life Sciences and previously served on the board of Thoratec Corporation.Inc. Ms. Marsh has been a director of the Company since 2012.

 

The Board of Directors has nominated Ms. Marsh to continue her service as a director of the Company based on her extensive background in and knowledge of the health care industry and specifically the health care provider marketplace with which we conduct our business. Having served in the lead management position of some of the most prestigious health care systems in the United States, she brings unique perspectives on the requirements of and challenges faced by the health care provider industry as well as a deep understanding of the entire U.S. health care marketplace. Her broad-based background in accounting, finance, operations and management in the context of the health care industry brings a multi-disciplinary and highly relevant point of view to our Board of Directors in assessing issues and challenges within the health care marketplace.

  

LOGOLOGO

Mark F. McGettrick, 60, is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dominion Energy Inc., a position he has held since June 2009. In addition, Mr. McGettrick also has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and a member of the board of directors of Dominion Energy Midstream GP, LLC, the general partner of Dominion Energy Midstream Partners, LP, since March 2014. From January 2003 to 2009, Mr. McGetterick served as Chief Executive Officer of the company’s Dominion Generation operating segment. Mr. McGettrick joined Dominion Energy, Inc. in 1980 and during his tenure has held a variety of other management positions in distribution design, accounting, customer service and generation. He currently serves on the board of directors of Virginia Electric and Power Company and Dominion Energy Gas Holdings, LLC, which are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Dominion Energy, Inc. Mr. McGettrick was appointed to the Board on March 1, 2018.

The Board of Directors has nominated Mr. McGettrick to serve as a director of the Company based on his background and breadth of experience in risk management, business planning, accounting, mergers and acquisitions and financial analysis through his service as a Chief Financial Officer of a large publicly-traded company.

LOGO

  

Eddie N. Moore, Jr., 67, currently serves 70, retired in 2017 as Interim President and& Chief Executive Officer of Norfolk State University. From 2011 to 2012, he served as President of St. Paul’s College. He is President Emeritus of Virginia State University after serving as its President from 1993 to 2010. Prior to leading Virginia State University, Mr. Moore served as state treasurer for the Commonwealth of Virginia, heading the Department of the Treasury and serving on fifteen state boards and authorities. He also serves on the board of directors of Universal Corporation. Mr. Moore has been a director of the Company since 2005.

 

The Board of Directors has nominated Mr. Moore to continue his service as a director of the Company based on his strong background in accounting and finance, which qualify him to serve as an audit committee financial expert, and his leadership experience in managing prominent educational institutions. The Board believes that Mr. Moore’s experiences in the public sector bring unique perspectives and disciplines to the Board’s deliberations and decision-making processes.

  

LOGOLOGO

  

James E. RogersP. Cody Phipps,, 69, has served 56, joined Owens & Minor as Chairman of the Board of BackOffice Associates, LLC, a private company that provides data quality, migration and governance solutions, since 2011.its President & Chief Executive Officer effective July 1, 2015. He served as President & Chief Executive Officer of SCI Investors Inc,Essendant, Inc. (formerly United Stationers Inc.) from 2011 to 2015. He served as Essendant’s President from 2006 to 2011 and as Senior Vice President, Operations from 2003 to 2006. Previously, he was a private equity investment firm, from 1993 untilPartner at McKinsey & Company, Inc., where heco-founded and led its Service Strategy and Operations Initiative, which focused on driving operational improvements in complex service and logistics environments. During his retirement in 2011.tenure at McKinsey, Mr. Phipps provided consulting services to a range of corporate clients across a diverse set of industries, including retail, manufacturing and healthcare. He alsoformerly served on the board of directors ofCon-way, Inc. and currently serves on the board of directors of NewMarket Corporation and formerly served on the boards of Caraustar Industries, Inc., Wellman, Inc., Chesapeake Corp. and Cadmus Communications, Inc.R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company. Mr. RogersPhipps has been a director of the Company since 1991.2015.

 

The Board of Directors has nominated Mr. RogersPhipps to continue his serviceserve as a director of the Company based onupon his leadership experienceunique ability as a former chief executive officerChief Executive Officer to communicate to and other senior executive positions with several public and private companies, as well as his breadth of knowledgeinform the Board about the Company, its cultureCompany’sday-to-day operations, implementation of strategic initiatives, and the health care distribution industry acquired through his 24-year tenuredevelopments. The Board believes that Mr. Phipps brings an invaluable perspective on the Company’s Board of Directors. In addition, Mr. Rogers has demonstrated significant leadershipcurrent operations and communication skills in his service as the Company’s independent lead director for more than ten years until 2014.ongoing relationships with customers and suppliers.

    

LOGO

David S. Simmons, 50, has served as Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC, a global contract pharmaceutical research organization, since 2012. From 2001 to 2012, Mr. Simmons served in a variety of management positions with Pfizer, Inc., including as President and General Manager of the Emerging Markets and Established Products Business Units, Regional President of the Eastern Europe Pharmaceutical Division, President of the Pharmaceutical Division in Greece and Vice President of Marketing in Canada. Mr. Simmons has been a director of the Company since 2013.

The Board of Directors has nominated Mr. Simmons to continue his service as a director of the Company based on his extensive background and experience in the global pharmaceutical business and the breadth of knowledge he brings to Owens & Minor and its international operations through his leadership positions with Pfizer in Europe and abroad. With a strong background in finance, operations and logistics in the context of the pharmaceutical industry, Mr. Simmons brings unique knowledge and perspectives to the Company, especially with respect to our third party logistics growth and globalization strategy.

  

LOGO

  

Robert C. Sledd 62,, 65, served as a Senior Economic Advisor to the Governor of Virginia from 2010 to 2014. Since 2008, he also has served as Managing Partner of Pinnacle Ventures, LLC and Sledd Properties, LLC. From 1995 to 2008, he served as Chairman of Performance Food Group Co. (“PFG”), a foodservice distribution company that heco-founded in 1987. He served as Chief Executive Officer of PFG from 1987 to 2001 and from 2004 to 2006. He also serves on the boards of directors of SCP Pool Corporation and Universal Corporation. Mr. Sledd has been a director of the Company since 2007.

 

The Board of Directors has nominated Mr. Sledd to continue his service as a director of the Company based on his expertise in economic and business development policy, as well as his experience as a former chief executive of a foodservice distribution company, including his knowledge and understanding of the specific issues and challenges faced by companies in the business of distribution and supply chain management. His experiences in founding, growing and taking public PFG allow him to contribute to the Board a breadth of perspectives and ideas on matters of corporate management, governance and strategic growth.

    
  

LOGO

Craig R. Smith, 63, has served as Chairman of the Board of Owens & Minor since 2013 and as Executive Chairman since September 2014. He served as Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 2013 until September 2014 and as President & Chief Executive Officer from 2005 until 2013. Mr. Smith, who joined the Company in 1989, served as President & Chief Operating Officer from 1999 until 2005 and as Chief Operating Officer from 1995 to 1999. He also serves on the board of directors of the Virginia Biotechnology Research Partnership Authority. Mr. Smith has been a director of the Company since 2005.

The Board of Directors has nominated Mr. Smith to continue his service as a director of the Company based on the depth of his experience in leading and managing Owens & Minor’s growth and operations over the past two decades and navigating the constantly changing healthcare marketplace. The Board believes that Mr. Smith’s extensive knowledge of the Company, deep understanding of the healthcare supply logistics industry, strong relationships with the Company’s customers and suppliers and success in leading the Company’s growth uniquely qualify him to serve as the Board’s Chairman.

LOGOLOGO

  

Anne Marie Whittemore,, 68, 71, has been a partner in the law firm of McGuireWoods LLP since 1977. She also serves on the board of directors of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., formerly served on the board of Albemarle Corporation and is a former chairmanChairman of the boardBoard of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Virginia.Richmond. Ms. Whittemore has been a director of the Company since 1991 and lead director since 2014.

 

The Board of Directors has nominated Ms. Whittemore to continue her service as a director of the Company based on the unique background and perspectives she brings to the boardBoard as an attorney whose areas of specialty include corporate governance and complex commercial and securities litigation matters. Her experience includes representation of several Fortune 100 corporations and other companies in matters involving corporate governance and shareholder matters. Ms. Whittemore also has extensive experience as a public company director and member of both compensation and governance committees, which the Board believes contributes to her strong leadership skills and led to her appointment in 2014 as lead director.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of each nominee as director.

RETIRING DIRECTORS

Effective immediately following the Annual Meeting, Messrs. Rogers and Simmons’ terms will expire, at which time they will retire from the Board. The Company gratefully acknowledges and thanks Mr. Rogers’ for his 26 years and Mr. Simmons for his four years of service and dedication to our Board.

LOGO

James E. Rogers, 72, served from 2011 to 2015 as Chairman of the Board of BackOffice Associates, LLC, a private company that provides data quality, migration and governance solutions. He served as President of SCI Investors Inc, a private equity investment firm, from 1993 until his retirement in 2011. He also serves on the board of directors of NewMarket Corporation and formerly served on the boards of Caraustar Industries, Inc., Wellman, Inc., Chesapeake Corp. and Cadmus Communications, Inc. Mr. Rogers has been a director of the Company since 1991 and has demonstrated significant leadership and communication skills in his service as the Company’s independent lead director for more than 10 years until 2014. Mr. Rogers will retire immediately following the 2018 Annual Meeting.

LOGO

David S. Simmons, 53, has served as Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC, a global biopharmaceutical research organization, since 2012. From 2001 to 2012, Mr. Simmons served in a variety of management positions with Pfizer, Inc., including as President and General Manager of the Emerging Markets and Established Products Business Units, Regional President of the Eastern Europe Pharmaceutical Division, President of the Pharmaceutical Division in Greece and Vice President of Marketing in Canada. Mr. Simmons has been a director of the Company since 2013 and will retire immediately following the 2018 Annual Meeting.

PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED OWENS & MINOR, INC. 20152018 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

The Company currently has in effect the 20052015 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005“2015 Plan”). The 20052015 Plan permits the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, performance shares (sometimes called stock units)units and incentive awards. The 2005 Plan was first adopted by theOn February 8, 2018, our Board of Directors in 2005 and was approved by shareholders in 2005 and 2010.

On February 5, 2015, the Board adopted the 2015Owens & Minor, Inc. 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2015“2018 Plan”), subject to the approval of shareholders. Like the 20052015 Plan, the 20152018 Plan authorizes the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, stock units and incentive awards. If the shareholders approve the 20152018 Plan, no additional awards will be granted under the 20052015 Plan after the date of shareholder approval of the 2018 Plan. The closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on March 1, 2018 was $16.11 per share.

TheOur Board of Directors believes that the 20052015 Plan has benefited, and the 20152018 Plan will benefit, the Company, by (i) assisting in recruiting and retaining the services of individualsteammates andnon-employee directors with high ability and initiative, (ii) providing greater incentives for employeesteammates and other individualsnon-employee directors who provide valuable services to the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates and (iii) associating the interests of thosethese persons with those of the Company and its shareholders. The more significant

Key features of the 2018 Plan, which contains provisions considered best practices for compensation and governance purposes, include:

The 2018 Plan generally will be administered by our Compensation Committee which consists entirely of independentnon-employee directors.

The 2018 Plan sets reasonable limits as to the awards any teammate, ornon-employee director may receive in any calendar year.

All stock options and stock appreciation rights must have an exercise price that is not less than the fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date.

The maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that will be made available under the 2018 Plan is the sum of (i) 3,600,000 shares, less the number of shares of our Common Stock subject to awards granted under the 2015 Plan after March 1, 2018,plus (ii) the number of shares of our Common Stock subject to awards granted under the 2015 Plan that become available after March 1, 2018 because of the expiration, cancellation or forfeiture of the award without the issuance of the underlying shares. Between January 1, 2018 and March 1, 2018, awards representing 705,882 shares of Common Stock were granted under the 2015 Plan. This does not include awards to be granted in connection with our acquisition of Halyard Health S&IP, which we estimate will represent approximately 364,540 shares (based on a Common Stock price of $16.11 per share). We currently expect this acquisition to close early in the second quarter of 2018.

Shares of Common Stock not issued as the result of a net settlement of options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, stock units and incentive awards, or tendered or withheld to pay the exercise price, purchase price or withholding taxes relating to options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, stock units and incentive stock awards, shall not again be made available for issuance as awards under the 2018 Plan.

All awards granted under the 2018 Plan will be subject to aone-year minimum vesting period, provided that (i) up to 5% of the shares authorized for issuance under the 2018 Plan (subject to adjustments) may provide for vesting of awards in less than one year and (ii) awards granted tonon-employee directors may vest earlier than one year upon the annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders that occurs in the year immediately following the year of grant so long as the awards vest as of a date that is not earlier than two weeks prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding year’s annual shareholders meeting.

In connection with a change in control, vesting oftime-based awards will only be accelerated if the time-based awards are summarized below.not assumed or converted into substitute awards following the change in control and vesting ofperformance-based awards shall only be accelerated to the extent of actual

achievement of the performance conditions as of the date of the change in control or on a prorated basis for time elapsed in ongoing performance period(s) through the date of the change in control, whichever the Committee determines appropriate, if the performance-based awards are not assumed or converted into substitute awards following the change in control. Otherwise, vesting of an award may only be accelerated in connection with a termination of service (including but not limited to death, disability, retirement or involuntary termination) or if the award is outstanding for at least one year, provided that up to 5% of the shares authorized for issuance under the 2018 Plan may be issued pursuant to awards without regard to any such restriction on accelerated vesting.

The 2018 Plan does not include any reload feature which would provide for an automatic grant of additional awards or any “evergreen” share replenishment features which would provide for an automatic increase in the number of shares available for issuance.

The following2018 Plan prohibits the repricing of outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights and other stock awards in the nature of purchase rights, whether by amending an existing award or by substituting a new award at a lower price, without shareholder approval. The 2018 Plan also prohibits the payment of cash, awards or other securities in exchange forout-of-the-money awards, without shareholder approval.

Awards granted under the 2018 Plan are subject to the Company’s Recoupment Policy (which is described on page 52 of this proxy statement).

There is not a liberal change in control definition in the 2018 Plan. A change in control does not occur on announcement or commencement of a tender offer or a potential takeover or on shareholder approval of a merger or other transaction.

Any material amendments to the 2018 Plan require shareholder approval.

No dividends or dividend equivalents may be granted in connection with options, stock appreciation rights or other awards in the nature of purchase rights. No dividends or dividend equivalents may be paid in connection with a stock award or stock unit unless and until the award is no longer subject to forfeiture conditions, and any such dividends or dividend equivalents will either be (i) deemed reinvested in additional awards which remain subject to the same forfeiture and other conditions applicable to the award to which such dividends or dividend equivalents related or (iii) accumulated (without interest) and become payable only at the time and to the extent the related award becomes nonforfeitable and/or payable. No dividends may be paid with respect to an award that is forfeited.

The 2018 Plan does not provide for taxgross-ups of any kind.

A summary of the materialprincipal features of the 20152018 Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the termsincluded below. However, every aspect of the 20152018 Plan a copyis not addressed in this summary and shareholders are encouraged to read the full text of the 2018 Plan which is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement asAnnex A. We have no current plans, proposals or arrangements, written or otherwise, to grant any specific awards under the 2015 Plan that have not been granted as of March 1, 2018or under the 2018 Plan, except in connection with the closing of our acquisition of Halyard Health S&IP or as provided for under our Board of Directors compensation plan (as described on pages 18 and to the electronic copy9 respectively of this proxy statement).

Reasons for the 2018 Plan and Recommendation of the Board of Directors

As described in more detail in this proxy statement filedunder “Executive Compensation—Compensation Disclosure and Analysis,” we believe our compensation programs are structured to attract, retain and motivate our teammates andnon-employee directors. Our Board of Directors believes that equity incentive awards play a key role in these programs as they help align the interests of teammates andnon-employee directors with those of our shareholders. As of March 1, 2018, there were (1) 61,488,172 shares of our Common Stock outstanding, (2) 1,532,907 full value shares outstanding which include outstanding Performance Shares at target but there are no outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights, and (3) only 773,638 shares available for grant under the 2015 Plan, which amount will be further reduced by the grant of awards representing an estimated 364,540 additional shares of Common Stock in connection with the SECHalyard Health S&IP acquisition.

Historical Burn Rate; Potential Economic Dilution Analysis. We are committed to managing the use of our equity incentives prudently to balance the benefits equity compensation brings to our compensation programs against the dilution it causes our shareholders. As part of our analysis when considering the number of shares to be reserved under the 2018 Plan, we considered the 2015 Plan’s “burn rate,” calculated as the number of shares subject to equity awards granted under the 2015 Plan, divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for that period. Our average burn rate for the three years ending December 31, 2017 was 3.73%. The total potential dilution resulting from issuing all shares authorized under our equity plans as of March 1, 2018 would be approximately 3.8%. We believe that our burn rate and may be accessedpotential dilution amounts are reasonable for our industry and market conditions. Since the 2015 Plan was adopted, we have sought to provide equity compensation to our teammates andnon-employee directors who we believe are important to our organization in furthering our business strategy. In addition, since that time we have made multiple leadership appointments and promotions to advance our strategy. We made equity grants from the SEC’s website2015 Plan in connection with each of these new hires and promotions. We believe these new hires and promotions are key to the development and strengthening of the management team with the experience and talent necessary to further implement our transformation. Additionally, we have made two significant acquisitions in 2017 and 2018, Byram Healthcare and Halyard Health S&IP, to accelerate our transformation and have issued awards under our 2015 Plan prior to March 1, 2018 representing 63,501 shares of Common Stock to teammates who have joined us from Byram Healthcare and expect to issue awards representing an additional 364,540 shares of Common Stock to teammates who will join us from Halyard Health S&IP.

Expected Duration. We expect that the shares available under the 2018 Plan for future awards, if the 2018 Plan is approved by our shareholders, will be sufficient forcurrently-anticipated awards for the next three- four years. Expectations regarding future share usage could be impacted by a number of factors such as hiring and promotion activity atwww.sec.gov. the executive level; the rate at which shares are returned to the 2018 Plan reserve upon awards’ expiration, forfeiture or cash settlement; the future performance of our stock price; factors involved in acquiring other companies; and other factors. While we believe that the assumptions we used are reasonable, future share usage may differ from current expectations.

For the foregoing reasons, our Board of Directors recommends that our shareholders approve the 2018 Plan.

Administration of the 20152018 Plan

The 20152018 Plan is generally administered by the Compensation & Benefits Committee of the Board (sometimes referred to in this summary as the “Committee”).Committee. The Compensation Committee approves all terms of awards to teammates under the 20152018 Plan. The Compensation Committee also approves the teammates who will receive grants under the 20152018 Plan, determines the type of award that will be granted and approves the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the grant.

However, the The Governance & Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors administers the 20152018 Plan in the case of any award that is made to a member of the Board who is not also an employeea teammate of the Company or an affiliate. References in this summary to the “Committee”“Compensation Committee” include, the Compensation & Benefits Committee and, with respect to awards made tonon-employee directors, the Governance & Nominating Committee.

Participation in 2018 Plan

Because awards under the 20152018 Plan are made at the Compensation Committee’s discretion, we are unable to determine who will be selected to receive awards or the type, size or terms of the awards that may be granted. For the same reason, we are unable to determine the awards that would have been granted last year if the 20152018 Plan had been in effect. However, outstanding awards previously granted under the 20052015 Plan are reported herein. See “Grants of Plan Based Awards Table” on page 4856 and “Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End Table” on page 5058 of this proxy statement.

EligibilityAny teammate, consultant ornon-employee director of the Company or any affiliate who, in the judgment of the Compensation Committee, has contributed significantly or can be expected to contribute significantly to

the performance of the Company and/or its affiliates may receive an award under the 2018 Plan. The Company currently has approximately 8,600 teammates (including approximately 10 teammates who are officers), and the Company currently has 11non-employee directors. In fiscal 2017 the Company made awards to 301 participants, which included nine executive officers and our 10non-employee directors. The Compensation Committee has the complete discretion, as provided in the 2018 Plan, to select eligible teammates, consultants and/ornon-employee directors to receive awards under the 2018 Plan and to determine for each teammate, consultant ornon-employee director the nature of the award and the terms and conditions of each award.

AllThe basis for participation in the 2018 Plan is that the Compensation Committee has determined that such participation will further the 2018 Plan’s purposes. In exercising its discretion, the Compensation Committee will consider the recommendations of our employeesmanagement and employeesthe purposes of ourthe 2018 Plan, which include the recruiting and retaining of teammates andnon-employee directors with high ability and initiative, providing greater incentives for teammates andnon-employee directors who provide valuable services to the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates are eligibleand associating the interests of these persons with those of the Company and its shareholders. For a description of the basis of participation for our executive officers andnon-employee directors during fiscal 2017, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on pages 33 through 53 of the proxy statement and “Director Compensation” on page 9 of the proxy statement.

The 2018 Plan includes reasonable limits on the benefits that any participant may receive for any calendar year. No teammate may be granted, in any calendar year, (i) options, stock appreciation rights or other purchase rights for more than 2,000,000 shares of our Common Stock, (ii) stock awards or stock units for more than 1,000,000 shares of our Common Stock or (iii) incentive awards exceeding $10,000,000. The foregoing limitations can be multiplied by two for awards granted to receive grants underteammates during the 2015 Plan. In addition, memberscalendar year in which the teammate first commences employment or other service. The 2018 Plan also provides that in any calendar year anon-employee director may not be granted awards during any single calendar year in respect of thenon-employee director’s service as a member of the board that, taken together with any cash fees paid to thenon-employee director, exceeds $750,000 in total value (calculating the value of any such awards based on the grant date fair value of such awards for financial accounting purposes). The Compensation Committee may, however, make exceptions to the foregoing limit (up to twice such limit) for anon-executive chair of the Board and individuals who provide servicesof Directors or, in extraordinary circumstances, for other individualnon-employee directors, as the Compensation Committee may determine, provided that thenon-employee director receiving such awards may not participate in the decision to us or a subsidiary or affiliate may receive grants under the 2015 Plan.make such awards.

Share Authorization

The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the 2018 Plan is the sum of (i) 3,600,000 shares, less the number of shares of our Common Stock subject to awards granted under the 2015 Plan is 3,000,000afterMarch 1, 2018, plus (ii) the number of shares of our Common Stock that are subject to awards granted under the 2015 Plan that become available after March 1, 2018 because of the expiration, cancellation or forfeiture of the award without the issuance of the underlying shares. In connection with stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and certain other events, the Board will make adjustments that it deems appropriate in the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that

may be issued under the 20152018 Plan, the terms of outstanding awards and the per individual grant limitations (described belowlimitations.

Except as described herein, each share of Common Stock issued in connection with an award granted under “Section 162(m)”). In determining the 2018 Plan will reduce the total number of shares to include inof Common Stock available for issuance under the 20152018 Plan the Committee considered anticipated share usage over the next three to five years and likely institutional investor perceptions of the additional share request. The Committee also considered annual share burn rate and overhang relative to its Peer Companies (set forth on page 32 of this proxy statement) and peers in other industry groups. The Company’s burn rate is below competitive median, and the requested share authorization will position the Company’s total overhang below the median of its peers. The Committee believes this share request will be sufficient to provide competitive equity grants to our employees over the next few years and will not be perceived by most shareholders as overly dilutive.

one. If any options, or stock appreciation rights, stock awards, stock units or other awards terminate, expire or are canceled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered without having been exercised or paid or if any stock awards or stock unit awards are forfeited,without issuance of the underlying shares, the Common Stock subject to such awards, to the extent of the termination, expiration, cancellation, forfeiture, surrender or cash settlement, will again be available for awards under the 20152018 Plan. Any shares of Common Stock that are tendered or withheld from the settlement of an award to satisfy the grant or exercise price or to satisfy a tax withholding obligation under an award will not be available for future awards to

be granted under the 20152018 Plan. If Common Stock is issued in settlement of a stock appreciation right, the number of shares available for future awards will be reduced by the number of shares for which the stock appreciation right was exercised rather than the number of shares issued. Shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the 2018 Plan may not be increased through the Company’s purchase of shares of Common Stock on the open market with the proceeds obtained from the exercise of options or other purchase rights granted under the 2018 Plan.

Awards

The Compensation Committee will determine the eligible individuals who will receive awards under the 20152018 Plan and the Compensation Committee will specify the type of award that is made and will prescribe the terms and conditions that govern each award. The 20152018 Plan generally provides that no award will bebecome fully exercisable or entirely vested before the third anniversary of the grant or before the first anniversary of the date of grant ifof the award, is madeprovided that (i) awards may be granted without regard to this minimum vesting requirement with respect to a membermaximum of 5% of the Board who is not an employeeshares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Company or a subsidiary or if2018 Plan and (ii) awards may be granted without regard to the award will become exercisable or vest on account of achieving one or more performance objectives.minimum vesting requirement tonon-employee directors as described above. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the Compensation Committee may accelerate the exercisability or vesting of awards (a)(i) in connection with a termination of employment or other service (including without limitation on death, disability, retirement or (b)involuntary termination) or (ii) if the award has been outstanding for at least one year. The Committee also may accelerate the exercisability or vesting of awards with respect toyear, and up to 300,0005% of the shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the 2018 Plan may be issued without regard to the requirementsany such restrictions on accelerated vesting of the preceding sentence.awards.

Options.    The 20152018 Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee to grant incentive stock options (under Section 421 of the Internal Revenue Code) and options that do not qualify as incentive stock options. The exercise price of each option will be determined by the Compensation Committee, provided that the price cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date on which the option is granted (or 110% of the shares’ fair market value on the grant date in the case of an incentive stock option to an individual who is a “ten percent shareholder” under Sections 422 and 424 of the Internal Revenue Code). Except in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and other changes in our capitalization, unless approved by shareholders, the exercise price of an outstanding option cannot be reduced and no payment can be made to cancel an option if the exercise price exceeds the shares’ fair market value on the date of cancellation.

The exercise price for any option is generally payable (i) in cash, (ii) in a cash equivalent acceptable to the Compensation Committee, or (iii) by the surrender of Common Stock (including Common Stock otherwise issuable upon exercise of the option) (or attestation of ownership of Common Stock) with an aggregate fair market value on the date on which the option is exercised equal to the exercise price for the number of shares being purchased.

The term of an option cannot exceed ten10 years from the date of grant (or five years in the case of an incentive share option granted to a “ten percent shareholder”). The Compensation Committee may grant options that have a term less than the maximum term permitted under the 20152018 Plan. The 20152018 Plan provides for the automatic exercise of options if (a) the participant remains in the continuous employ or service of the Company from the date of grant

until the stated expiration date of the option and (b) the fair market value of the shares subject to the option exceeds the exercise price. In that event, if not exercised by the participant, the option will be exercised on the stated expiration date and the participant will be issued shares of Common Stock that have a fair market value equal to the excess of the aggregate number of shares subject to the exercised portion of the option over the number of shares whose fair market value equals the aggregate exercise price of the option and applicable tax withholdings.

No dividends may be paid with respect to an option.

Stock Awards.    The 20152018 Plan also provides for the grant of stock awards. A stock award is an award of Common Stock that will be subject to restrictions on transferability and such other restrictions as the

Compensation Committee determines on the date of grant and consistent with the terms of the 20152018 Plan, including the vesting requirements described above. The vesting requirements or restrictions may be stated with reference to one or more performance objectives, including objectives stated with respect to “performance goals” as described below under “Section 162(m).“Performance Objectives.” The restrictions, if any, may lapse over a specified period of time or through the satisfaction of conditions, in installments or otherwise, as the Compensation Committee may determine.

A participant who receives a stock award will have all of the rights of a shareholder as to those shares, including, without limitation, the right to vote and the right to receive dividends or distributions on the shares; provided, however, that the 20152018 Plan provides that dividends payable on a stock award that does not vest solely on account of continued employment or service willshall either be payable when, and onlydeemed reinvested in additional stock awards, which shall remain subject to the extent that,same forfeiture and transfer conditions applicable to the underlying stock award vests.with respect to which such dividends related, or accumulated and paid in cash, without interest, if and at the time the related stock award is no longer subject to forfeiture and transfer conditions. During the period, if any, when stock awards arenon-transferable or forfeitable, (i) a participant is prohibited from selling, transferring, pledging, exchanging, hypothecating or otherwise disposing of his or her stock award shares, (ii) the company will retain custody of the certificates and (iii) a participant must deliver a share power to the companyCompany for each stock award. No dividends may be paid with respect to a stock award that is forfeited.

Stock Appreciation Rights.    The 20152018 Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee to grant stock appreciation rights that provide the recipient with the right to receive, upon exercise of the stock appreciation right, cash, Common Stock or a combination of the two. The amount that the recipient will receive upon exercise of the stock appreciation right generally will equal the excess of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of exercise over the shares’ fair market value on the date of grant (the “initial value”). Stock appreciation rights will become exercisable in accordance with terms prescribed by the Compensation Committee and consistent with the terms of the 20152018 Plan, including the vesting requirements described above. Stock appreciation rights may be granted in tandem with an option grant or independently from an option grant. The term of a stock appreciation right cannot exceed ten years from the date of grant or five years in the case of a share appreciation right granted in tandem with an incentive stock option awarded to a “ten percent shareholder”. The Compensation Committee may grant stock appreciation rights that have a term less than thesuch maximum terms permitted under the 2015 Plan.terms. The 20152018 Plan provides for the automatic exercise of a stock appreciation right if (a) the participant remains in the continuous employ or service from the date of grant until the stated expiration date of the stock appreciation right and (b) the fair market value of the shares subject to the stock appreciation right exceeds the initial value per share. In that event, if not exercised by the participant, the stock appreciation right will be exercised on the stated expiration date and the participant will receive the amount payable for exercises on that date.date (subject to applicable withholdings).

Except in the case of stock splits, stock dividends and other changes in our capitalization, the initial value of an outstanding stock appreciation right cannot be reduced without the approval of shareholders. In addition, the 20152018 Plan provides that no payment may be made on account of the cancellation of a stock appreciation right if the initial value exceeds the fair market value of a share of Common Stock.

No dividends may be paid with respect to any stock appreciation rights.

Stock Units.    The 20152018 Plan also authorizes the Compensation Committee to grant awards of stock units. Stock units represent the participant’s right to receive an amount, based on the value of the Common Stock, if the requirements established by the Compensation Committee are satisfied. Consistent with the terms of the 20152018 Plan, including the vesting requirements described above, the Compensation Committee will determine the applicable performance period, the performance goals and such other conditions that apply to the stock unit award. Performance goals may be stated with respect to the performance criteria described below under “Section 162(m)”“Performance Objectives” or such other criteria determined by the Compensation Committee. If the performance goals and other requirements are met, stock units will be paid in cash, Common Stock or a combination thereof.

The Committee may grant dividend equivalents in connection with the grant of stock units. Dividend equivalents may be paid currently or accrued as contingent obligations (in which case they may be deemed to have been invested in shares of Common Stock) and may be payable in cash, Common Stock or a combination of the two. The Committee will determine the terms of any dividend equivalents. However, the 2015 Plan provides that amounts payable under dividend equivalent rights that relate to a stock unit award that does not vest solely on account of continued employment or service will be payable when, and only to the extent that, the underlying award vests.

Incentive Awards.    The 20152018 Plan also permits the grant of incentive awards. An incentive award is an opportunity to earn a payment upon the terms and conditions prescribed by the Compensation Committee. The terms and conditions may provide that the incentive award will be earned only if the participant’s employment continues for a specified period or only to the extent that the participant, the Company or an affiliate achieves objectives measured over a period of at least one year. The objectives may be stated with reference to one or more of the performance criteria described below under “Section 162(m)”“Performance Objectives” or such other criteria determined by the Compensation Committee. If an incentive award is earned, the amount payable will be paid in cash, Common Stock or a combination thereof. No dividends may be paid in respect of an incentive award.

Change in Control

If we experienceUnless an outstanding award is assumed or otherwise continued after a change in control, upon a change in control andcash-out of the Committee may, at its discretion, provide that all outstanding options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, stock unit awards and incentive awards will be assumed by the surviving entity, or will be replaced by a comparable substitute award, of substantially equal value granted by the surviving entity. If an award is not assumed or replaced with a substitute award, the Committee may provide that (i) all outstanding optionseach option and stock appreciation rights willright shall be fully exercisable on the change in control,thereafter, (ii) restrictions and conditions on outstandingeach stock awards will lapse upon the change in control, (iii) stock unitsaward will become transferable and nonforfeitable, (iii) each stock unit award shall be earned in theirits entirety and converted into a transferable and nonforfeitable stock award, and (iv) each incentive awards willaward shall be earned, in whole or in part, in accordance with their terms. Ifthe terms of the applicable award agreement, except that (i) each performance-based option and stock appreciation right shall be exercisable, (ii) each performance-based stock award will become transferable and nonforfeitable, (iii) each performance-based stock unit award will be earned and converted into a transferable and nonforfeitable stock award, and (iv) each performance-based incentive award shall be earned only to the extent of actual performance through the date of the change in control or pro rata based on the elapsed portion of the performance period as of the date of the change in control, whichever the Committee determines appropriate.

In the event of a change in control, the Compensation Committee, in its discretion and without the need for a participant’s consent, may provide that an outstanding option, stock appreciation right, stock award, is notstock unit award or incentive award shall be assumed by, or replaced with a substitute award granted by, the surviving entity in the change in control. Such assumed or substituted award shall be of the same type of award as the original option, stock appreciation right, stock award, stock unit award or incentive award being assumed or substituted.

Unless an outstanding award is to be assumed or otherwise continued after the change in control, the Compensation Committee, in its discretion and without the need of a participant’s consent, may also provide that participants must surrender their outstanding options,(i) each option and stock appreciation rights,right that is or will be exercisable on the date of the change in control, (ii) each stock awards,award that is or will become transferable and nonforfeitable, (iii) each stock unit awards,award that is or will be earned and incentive awardsconvertible into a transferable and nonforfeitable stock award and (iv) each inventive award that is or will be earned shall be cancelled in exchange for a payment. The payment may be in cash, or ourshares of Common Stock or other securities or consideration received by Company shareholders in the change in control transaction,transaction. The amount of the payment will be equal to (i) the valueamount by which the price per share received by the shareholder in the transaction exceeds the exercise price of the option or initial value of the stock appreciation right, (ii) the price per share received by the shareholders in the transaction for each share subject to a stock award or stock unit or (iii) the amount earned under the incentive award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, awards that are not vested,non-forfeitable or payable as of the change in control transaction (or, in the case of options and stock appreciation rights, the amount by which that transaction value exceeds the exercise price or initial value).will be cancelled without any payment therefor.

In summary, aA change of control under the 20152018 Plan generally occurs if:

 

a person, entity or affiliated group (with certain exceptions) acquires, in a transaction or series of transactions, at least 30% of our combined voting power;

 

we merge intowith another entity unless (i) the voting securities of the Company immediately prior to the merger continue to represent more than 50% of the combined voting power of the securities in the merged entity or its parent;parent or (ii) the merger is effected to implement a recapitalization transaction in which no person acquires more than 30% of our combined voting power;

 

the stockholders approve a plan of complete liquidation orthere is consummated an agreement for the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of our assets;

the stockholders approve a plan of complete liquidation; or

 

during any period of twotwelve (12) consecutive yearsmonths, individuals who, at the beginning of such period, constitute our Board, together with any new directors whose nomination or election was approved by a majority of the directors then so in office (other than individuals who become directors in connection with certain transactions or election contests), cease for any reason to constitute a majority of our Board.

The Internal Revenue Code has special rules that apply to “parachute payments,”i.e., compensation that is payable on account of a change in control. If the parachute payments exceed a safe harbor amount prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code, then the recipient is liable for a 20% excise tax on a portion of the parachute payments, and the Company is not allowed to claim a federal income tax deduction for a portion of the parachute payments.

The 20152018 Plan provides for a reduction in benefits if the benefits of awards, either alone or together with parachute payments under other plans and agreements, exceed the safe harbor amount. In that event, the participant’s total parachute payments will be reduced to the safe harbor amount,i.e., the maximum amount that may be paid without an excise tax liability or loss of deduction. However, the benefits will not be reduced, and the participant will receive all of the parachute payments, if the participant will receive a greaterafter-tax benefit, taking into account the excise tax payable by the participant, by receiving all of the parachute payments. The 20152018 Plan provides that these provisions do not apply to a participant who, under an agreement with the Company or the terms of another plan is not permitted to receive parachute payments in excess of the safe harbor amount.

Section 162(m)Performance Objectives

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits, to $1,000,000, the deduction that a public corporation may claim for compensation paid to each of its chief executive officer and its three other most highly paid executive officers (other than the chief financial officer). The deduction limitation does not apply to compensation that qualifies as “performance based compensation” under Section 162(m).

Awards granted under the 2015 Plan can qualify as performance based compensation under Section 162(m) only if, among other things, the plan, as approved by shareholders (i) includes a limit on the benefits that an individual may receive in a stated period and (ii) the plan identifies the performance measures or criteria that may be used for awards that are intended to qualify as performance based compensation.

As required by Section 162(m), the 2015 Plan includes limits on the benefits that any participant may receive in a stated period. The 2015 Plan provides that no participant may be granted, in any calendar year (i) options and stock appreciation rights covering more than 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock, (ii) stock awards and stock unit awards covering more than 500,000 shares of Common Stock or (iii) incentive awards exceeding $5,000,000. Each of these limits will be doubled with respect to awards granted to a Participant during the calendar year in which the Participant first commences employment. The two preceding sentences do not apply to a “non-employee director,” i.e., member of the Board who is not an employee. In any calendar year a non-employee director may not be granted (i) options or stock appreciation rights covering more than 60,000 shares of Common Stock or (ii) stock awards and stock unit awards covering more than 20,000 shares of Common Stock.

The 20152018 Plan also identifies performance criteria that may be used to establish performance goals that will determine whether an award becomes vested or is earned. The Compensation Committee may prescribe that an award will become vested or be earned only upon the attainment of one or more performance goals or objectives, stated with respect to one or more of:including but not limited to: (i) gross, operating or net earnings before or after taxes; (ii) return on equity; (iii) return on capital; (iv) return on sales; (v) return on assets or net assets; (vi) earnings per share; (vii) cash flow per share; (viii) book value per share; (ix) earnings growth; (x) sales or sales growth; (xi) volume growth; (xii) cash flow (as defined by the Compensation Committee); (xiii) Fair Market Value; (xiv) total shareholder return; (xv) market share; (xvi) productivity; (xvii) level of expenses; (xviii) quality; (xix) safety; (xx) customer satisfaction; (xxi) total economic value added; (xxii) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortizationamortization; and (xxiii) revenues or revenue growth.

A performance goal or objective may be stated with respect to the Company, a subsidiary or a business unit and also may be stated with respect to one or more of these criteria or may be expressed on an absolute basis or relative to the performance of one or more similarly situated companies or a published index. In establishing a performance goal or objective, the Compensation Committee may exclude any or all special, unusual or extraordinary items as determined under generally accepted accounting principles, including the charges or costs associated with restructurings of the Company, discontinued operations, other unusual ornon-recurring items and the cumulative effects of accounting changes. To the extent allowed by Section 162(m), theThe Compensation Committee may also adjust performance goals or objectives, including to reflect the impact of unusual ornon-recurring events affecting the Company and for changes in applicable tax laws and accounting principles.

Section 162(m) Transition Rule

If and to the extent that the Compensation Committee grants an award under the 2018 Plan in substitution for an award intended to constitute “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as in effect prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or pursuant to a

binding contract in effect as of November 2, 2017 and intended to constitute “qualified performance-based compensation” under the special transition rule under Section 162(m) then such award shall be (i) subject to such terms and conditions as are required for the award to continue to qualify under the transition rule for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, as the Compensation Committee shall determine, (ii) the award will be administered by asub-committee of the Compensation Committee which is comprised of two or more members that qualify as “outside directors” under Section 162(m) prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, and (iii) none of the provisions of the 2018 Plan shall apply to such award to the extent such provisions would result in the award no longer qualifying under the transition rule for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

Return of Awards; Repayment

The 20152018 Plan provides that all awards, and all payments under awards, are subject to any policy that the Company adopts requiring the return or repayment of compensation and/or benefits,i.e., a claw-back or compensation recoupment policy. To the extent required by any such policy as in effect on the date that the award is granted, the date the option or stock appreciation right was exercised, the date of payment or the date the award became vested or earned, a participant will be required to return any award (if not previously exercised or settled) and any payment previously made or proceeds received with respect to anany award (if the award has vested or been settled).

Amendment; Termination

The 20152018 Plan may be amended or terminated at any time by the Board;Board of Directors; provided that no amendment may adversely impair the benefitsrights of participants under outstanding awards. Our shareholders must approve any amendment if such approval is required under applicable law or stock exchange requirements. Our shareholders also must approve any amendment that materially increases the benefits accruing to participants under the 20152018 Plan, materially increases the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the 20152018 Plan (other than adjustments to reflect stock dividends, stock splits and other changes in capitalization) or materially modifies the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the 20152018 Plan. In addition, except in connection with adjustments to reflect stock dividends, stock splits and other changes in capitalization, the exercise price of an option, the purchase price of an award or the initial value of a stock appreciation right may not be reduced and no action that would constitute are-pricing of such awards may be taken without the approval of shareholders.

The 20152018 Plan provides that, unless terminated sooner by the Board or extended with shareholder approval, no awards may be made under the 20152018 Plan after April 29, 2025February 7, 2028.

Deferral of Awards

The Compensation Committee may permit a participant to defer, or if and to the extent specified in an award agreement require the participant to defer, receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of shares of Common Stock that would otherwise be due by virtue of the lapse or waiver of restrictions with respect to awards, the satisfaction of any requirements or goals with respect to awards, the lapse or waiver of the deferral period for awards, or the lapse or waiver of restrictions with respect to awards. If such deferral is permitted, the Compensation Committee will establish rules and procedures for making such deferral elections and for the payment of such deferrals which will be intended to conform in form and substance with applicable regulations promulgated under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. There are no incentive stock options mayassurances, however, that a participant will not be granted after February 4, 2025.subjected to tax penalties under Section 409A with respect to any awards or such deferrals.

No Employment Rights

Awards do not confer upon any individual any right to continue in the employ or service of the Company or any affiliate.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

Counsel advised us regarding the federal income tax consequencesThe grant of the 2015 Plan. No income is recognized by a participant at the time an option or stock appreciation rights is granted. Ifright will create no tax consequences for the option isparticipant or the Company at the time of the grant. A participant will have no taxable income upon exercise of an incentive stock option noexcept that a participant must recognize income will be recognized uponequal to the participant’sfair market value of the shares acquired minus the exercise price for alternative minimum tax purposes. Upon exercise of the incentive stock option. Income is recognized by a participant when he or she disposes of shares acquired underan option (other than an incentive stock option. The exercise of a nonqualified stock optionoption) or a stock appreciation right, a participant generally is a taxable event that requires the participant tomust recognize as ordinary income, the difference between the shares’ fair market value and the option price or the amount paid in settlement of the stock appreciation right.

Income is recognized on account of the grant of a stock award when the shares subject to the award first become transferable or are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. At that time the participant recognizes ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock, lessshares and/or the amount of cash acquired minus the exercise price or initial value. Upon a disposition of shares acquired by exercise of an incentive stock option on or before the earlier of the second anniversary of the grant of such incentive stock option or the first anniversary of the exercise of such option, the participant generally must recognize ordinary income equal to the lesser of (1) the fair market value of the shares at the date of exercise minus the exercise price, or (2) the amount realized upon the disposition of the incentive stock option shares minus the exercise price. Otherwise, a participant’s disposition of shares acquired upon the exercise of an option (including an incentive stock option for which the incentive stock award option holding periods are met) generally will result in only capital gain or loss. Other awards under the 2018 Plan, including stock awards, stock units and incentive awards, will generally result in ordinary income to the participant equal to the cash or the fair market value of the shares received (minus the amount, if any, amount paid by the participant for such shares) at the Common Stock.

No income is recognized upontime such cash or shares are received by the grantparticipant or, if later, the time that the substantial risk of stock units or incentive awards. Income will be recognized on the date that payment is made under the stock unit award or incentive award in an amount paid in settlementforfeiture of the stock units or incentive award.such shares lapses.

The employer (either the Company or its affiliate) generally will be entitled to claim a federal income tax deduction on account ofwith respect to an award granted under the exercise of a nonqualified stock option or stock appreciation right,2018 Plan when the vesting of a stockparticipant recognizes ordinary income with respect to the award or the settlement of stock units and incentive awards. Thein an amount of the deduction generally is equal to the ordinary income that is recognized by the participant. The employerCompany will not be entitled to a federal incomeclaim any tax deduction on accountof any amount recognized by a participant as capital gains.

The Company will be permitted to withhold from any award granted under the 2018 Plan any required withholding taxes. Payment of withholding taxes may be made through one or more of the following means: payment in cash (including personal check or wire transfer), or, with the approval of the Committee, by delivering shares previously owned by the grantee or by delivery of shares acquired or to be acquired under the award.

Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code.A participant may elect under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to be taxed at the time of grant of a stock award on the fair market value of the shares at that time rather than to be taxed when the risk of forfeiture lapses on the stock, and the Company will have a deduction available at the same time and in the same amount as the participant recognized income. If a participant files an election under Section 83(b) and the participant subsequently forfeits the restricted shares, he or exerciseshe would not be entitled to any tax deduction, including as a capital loss, for the value of the shares on which he or she previously paid tax. Except as discussed below, the Company generally will be entitled to a tax deduction at the time and equal to the amount recognized as ordinary income by the participant in connection with an option, stock appreciation right, or other award, but will be entitled to no tax deduction relating to amounts that represent a capital gain to a participant, Thus, the Company will not be entitled to any tax deduction with respect to an incentive stock option but may claim a federal income tax deduction on account of certain dispositions ofif the participant holds the shares acquired under anfor the incentive stock option.option holding periods.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR”FOR approval of the proposed Owens & Minor, Inc. 20152018 Stock Incentive Plan.

PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee (with confirmation of the Board) has selected KPMG LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 20152018 and has directed that management submit such appointment of KPMG LLP for ratification by the shareholders at the annual meeting. Representatives of KPMG LLP will be present at the annual meeting to answer questions and to make a statement, if they desire to do so.

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules of the SEC promulgated thereunder, the Audit Committee is solely responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Shareholder ratification of this appointment is not required by the Company’s Bylaws or otherwise. If shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will take such failure into consideration in future years. If shareholders ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it is determined that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company.

Prior to selecting KPMG LLP for fiscal 2018, the Audit Committee evaluated KPMG’s performance with respect to fiscal 2017. In conducting this annual evaluation, the Audit Committee considered management’s assessment of KPMG’s performance in areas such as (i) independence, (ii) the quality and the efficiency of the services provided, including audit planning and coordination, (iii) industry knowledge and (iv) the quality of communications, including KPMG staff accessibility and keeping management apprised of issues. The Audit Committee also considered KPMG’s tenure, the impact on the Company of changing auditors and the reasonableness of KPMG’s billable rates. The Audit Committee is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with the retention of KPMG LLP. In order to assure continuing auditor independence, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be a regular rotation of the independent registered accounting firm. Further, in conjunction with the rotation of the auditing firm’s lead engagement partner every five years, the Audit Committee and its chairperson will continue to be directly involved in the selection of KPMG LLP’s new lead engagement partner. The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of KPMG LLP to serve as our independent external auditor is in the best interests of us and our stockholders.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2015.the year ending December 31, 2018.

FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

For each of the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, KPMG LLP billed the Company the fees set forth below in connection with professional services rendered by that firm to the Company:

 

   Year 2014   Year 2013* 

Audit Fees

  $1,779,500    $1,605,000  

Audit-Related Fees

   693,310     144,750  

Tax Fees

   390,972     0  

All Other Fees

   0     31,750  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $2,863,782    $1,781,500  

* For 2013, $120,250 that was originally included under “All Other Fees” has been reclassified to “Audit-Related Fees.”

   Year 2017   Year 2016 

Audit Fees

  $2,110,500   $1,956,000 

Audit-Related Fees

   23,500    32,000 

Tax Fees

   264,000    102,000 

All Other Fees

   —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $2,398,000   $2,090,000 

Audit Fees.These were fees for professional services performed for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the Company’s filings on Forms10-K and10-Q, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, and services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and provision of a comfort letter in connection with our 2014 debt offering.engagements.

Tax Fees.    These were fees primarily for advice and consulting services related to the structuring of international operations, the restructuring of business operations and the structuring of and performance of tax due diligence for a 2014 international acquisition.

Audit-Related Fees.    These were fees primarily for the annual audits of the Company’s employee benefit plan financial statements, internal control attestations in certain foreign jurisdictions and consultations by management related to financial accounting and reporting matters and assistance with financial due diligence in connection with acquisitions by the Company in 2014.matters.

All OtherTax Fees.    These were fees primarily for other non-auditadvice and consulting services related services, including accountingto the structuring of international operations, and advisory support services.the restructuring of business operations.

The Audit Committee has established policies and procedures for the approval and pre-approval of audit services and permittednon-audit services in order to ensure the services do not impair the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee willpre-approve on an annual basis the annual audit services engagement terms and fees and will alsopre-approve certain audit-related services that may be performed by the independent auditors up to thepre-approved fee levels, as well as permissible tax planning and compliance services. The Audit Committee hasmay delegatepre-approval authority to one or more of its members, but anypre-approval decision by such member or members must be presented to the sole responsibility to engage and terminate the engagement of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, to pre-approve such

firm’s performance of audit services and permitted non-audit services and to review with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firmfull Audit Committee at its fees and plans for all auditing services.next scheduled meeting. All services provided by and fees paid to KPMG LLP in 20142017 werepre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with thepre-approval policies, and there were no instances of waiver of approval requirements or guidelines during this period. The Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures for services by independent registered public accounting firms are set forth in Appendix B to this proxy statement.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee is composed of four directors, each of whom is independent under the enhanced independence standards for audit committees in the Exchange Act and the rules thereunder as incorporated into the listing standards of the NYSE and under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, and two of whom have been determined by the Board of Directors to be audit committee financial experts. The Audit Committee met seven times during 2017. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, which the Audit Committee reviews at least annually and revises as necessary to ensure compliance with current regulatory requirements and industry changes.

As its charter reflects, the Audit Committee has a broad array of duties and responsibilities. With respect to financial reporting and the financial reporting process, management, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and the Audit Committee have the following respective responsibilities:

Management is responsible for:

 

Establishing and maintaining the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

Assessing the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each year; and

 

Preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for:

 

Performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

Expressing an opinion as to the conformity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; and

 

Expressing an opinion as to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee is responsible for:

 

Selecting the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm;

Overseeing and reviewing the financial statements and the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company; and

 

Overseeing and reviewing management’s evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

In this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20142017 were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed these consolidated financial statements with management and KPMG LLP, including the scope of the independent registered public accounting firm’s responsibilities, critical accounting policies and practices used and significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of such financial statements.

The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees, issued by thepursuant to Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)Auditing Standard No. 1301 (Communications with Audit Committees). The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the lettercommunications from KPMG LLP required by the PCAOB regarding the independence of that firm and has discussed with KPMG LLP the firm’s independence from the Company.

In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with management its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and has discussed with KPMG LLP its opinion as to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Based upon its discussions with management and KPMG LLP and its review of the representations of management and the report of KPMG LLP to the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20142017 for filing with the SEC.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Lemuel E. Lewis, Chairman

John W. Gerdelman

Eddie N. Moore, Jr.

David S. SimmonsRobert C. Sledd

STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Compliance with Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based solely on the Company’s records and information provided by our directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Common Stock, we believe that all reports required to be filed by our directors and executive officers under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act were filed on a timely basis during 20142017, except that, due to inadvertent errors, two grants of shares of restricted stock to Michael W. Lowry, Controllerin the following instances: (1) for Mr. P. Cody Phipps, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, were reported late (a grant of 300 shares of restricted stock on February 6, 2014 was reported onan amendment to a Form 5timely filed on February 5, 2015, and a grant of 1,416 shares of restricted stock on April 30, 2014 was reported on a Form 4 was filed on May 6, 2014).to correct an administrative error in reporting the amount of securities acquired; (2) for Mr. M. Jay Romans, a former executive officer of the Company, an amendment to a timely filed Form 4 was filed to correct an administrative error in reporting the amount of securities acquired; (3) for Ms. Barbara B. Hill and Mr. Lemuel E. Lewis, directors of the Company, Form 4s were inadvertently filed late to report the acquisition of phantom stock, derivative securities beneficially owned through the Company’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.

Stock Ownership by Management and the Board of Directors

The following table shows, as of March 5, 2015,13, 2018, the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by each director and director nominee, the executive officers identified as our NEOs“NEOs” in the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement and all current directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.

 

Name of

Beneficial Owner

  

Sole Voting and Investment

Power (1)

   Other (2)   Aggregate
Percentage
Owned
 

Sole Voting and Investment

Power (1)

Other (2)Aggregate
Percentage
Owned

Stuart M. Essig

   18,706     0     *   27,847  —   *

John W. Gerdelman

   13,635     0     *   24,190  —   *

Barbara B. Hill

 6,506  —   *

Lemuel E. Lewis

   20,356     0     *   39,579  —   *

Martha H. Marsh

   7,186     0     *   16,065  —   *

Mark F. McGettrick

 1,397  —   *

Eddie N. Moore, Jr.

   17,590     0     *   28,688  —   *

James E. Rogers

   58,897     0     *   58,991  —   *

David S. Simmons

 14,102  —   *

Robert C. Sledd

   14,022     0     *   22,901  —   *

Anne Marie Whittemore

   65,868     0     *   74,316  —   *

David S. Simmons

   4,225     0     *  

Craig R. Smith

   155,712     0     *  

James L. Bierman

   95,872     0     *  

P. Cody Phipps

 396,484  —   *

Richard A. Meier

   49,225     0     *   127,158  —   *

Erika T. Davis

   70,003     0     *  

Stuart Morris-Hipkins

 62,061 

Charles C. Colpo

   58,588     0     *   43,944  —   *

Grace R. den Hartog

   49,173     8,924     *  

Brian J. Shotto

   11,719     0     *  

All Executive Officers and Directors as a group (19 persons)

   797,979     19,134     1.29

Rony C. Kordahi

 48,160  —   *

All Executive Officers and Directors as a group (21 persons)

 1,274,493  —   2.04%

* Represents less than 1% of the total number of shares outstanding.

(1) No officer or director of the Company has the right to acquire any shares through the exercise of stock options within 60 days following March 5, 2015.13, 2018.

(2) Includes: (a) shares held by certain relatives or in estates; (b) shares held in various fiduciary capacities; and (c) shares for which the shareholder has shared power to dispose or to direct disposition. These shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned under the rules and regulations of the SEC, but the inclusion of such shares in the table does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership.

Stock Ownership by Certain Shareholders

The following table shows, as of March 5, 2015,13, 2018, any person (including any “group” as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) who, to our knowledge, was the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Common Stock.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerShares Beneficially OwnedPercentage  Owned

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 1002210055

 6,574,9876,672,191(1) 10.4110.79%

FMR LLC

245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210

3,200,032(2)5.07

Vanguard Group, Inc.

100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355

 4,377,9245,734,515(2)9.28%

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP

Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, Texas 78746

3,747,234(3) 6.936.06%

(1) Based upon a Schedule 13G report or amendment filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the SEC on January 9, 2015.19, 2018.

(2) Based upon a Schedule 13G report or amendment filed by FMR LLC with the SEC on February 13, 2015.

(3) Based upon a Schedule 13G report or amendment filed by Vanguard Group, Inc. with the SEC on February 11, 2015.9, 2018.

(3) Based upon a Schedule 13G report or amendment filed by Dimensional Fund Advisers LP with the SEC on February 9, 2018.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table shows, as of December 31, 2014,2017, information with respect to compensation plans under which shares of Common Stock are authorized for issuance.

 

Plan Category  

(a)

Number of securities to

be issued upon exercise

of outstanding options,

warrants and rights

   

(b)

Weighted-average exercise

price of outstanding options,

warrants and rights

   

(c)

Number of securities
remaining available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected
in column (a))

 

(a)

Number of securities to 

be issued upon exercise 

of outstanding options, 

warrants and rights (1) 

(b)

Weighted-average exercise

price of outstanding options,

warrants and rights (1)

(c)

Number of securities
remaining available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected
in column (a))

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders (1)(2)

   15,000    $20.49     1,800,000  360,556  1,292,281

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders (2)(3)

   —         —        —          —      

Total

   15,000    $20.49     1,800,000  360,556  1,292,281

(1) There are no outstanding options, warrants or rights as of December 31, 2017. The total in column (a) above relate to performance shares.

(2) These equity compensation plans are the 2003 Directors’ Compensation2015 Stock Incentive Plan adopted and approved by shareholders on April 30, 2015 and the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. No additional awards may be made under the 2003 Directors’ Compensation2005 Stock Incentive Plan. However, shares may be issued under such plan upon the exercise of options that remain outstanding under such plans.

(2)(3) The Company does not have any equity compensation plans that have not been approved by shareholders.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes our executive compensation philosophy and program,programs, the compensation decisions made by the Compensation & Benefits Committee under this programthese programs and the considerations that went into the making of theseour decisions in light of the Company’s performance in 2014.2017.

Our fiscal year 2014 NEOs2017 named executive officers (“NEOs”) are:

 

Craig R. Smith Named Executive  Officer   Executive ChairmanTitle
James L. BiermanP. Cody Phipps  Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
Richard A. Meier  Executive Vice President, & Chief Financial Officer & President, International
Erika T. DavisStuart Morris-Hipkins*  SeniorExecutive Vice President, Administration & OperationsGlobal Manufacturer Services
Charles C. ColpoColpo**  Senior Vice President, Strategic RelationshipsSupplier Management
Grace R. den HartogRony C. Kordahi  SeniorExecutive Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
Brian J. Shotto*Former Senior Vice President, Manufacturer ServicesNorth American Operations

*Mr. Shotto resigned fromMorris-Hipkins joined the Company effective August 31, 2014.March 13, 2017 as its Executive Vice President, Manufacturing Services, and was promoted to President, Global Solutions on January 3, 2018.

**Mr. Colpo became Senior Vice President, Strategic Supplier Management on November 26, 2017, having previously served as Senior Vice President, Europe Operations.

Executive Summary

20142017 Business Transformation, Performance Highlightsand Compensation Review

For Owens & Minor, 20142017 was a year of growthstrategic transformation for Owens & Minor in an effort to strengthen our core Domestic distribution and continued advancementlogistics business and to reposition the Company for future success as a global healthcare solutions company. At the outset of our strategic vision while we managed through2017, the Company recognized that its core Domestic distribution and logistics business was under margin and competitive pressures as a result of market dynamics and vertically integrated competitors bundling and subsidizing distribution with product margins. The business was also being impacted by thede-leveraging effect of the loss of a large customer in 2016.

To combat these pressures, the medical/surgical supply distributionBoard and third party logistics markets, both domestic and international, and re-structured portions of our logistics operations abroad.

Highlights of 2014 performance include:executive management resolved to:

 

 1)

Revenue Growth. Consolidated revenues for 2014 were $9.44 billion, anReduce expenses, increase of $369 million,efficiency and productivity and add significant operating income (to replace lost margin) through a “rapid business transition” or 4.1%, when compared to 2013 revenues. Excluding the impact of $46.9 million in revenue from two acquisitions in 2014, consolidated revenues grew 3.5% for the year.

“RBT” process,

 

 2)

Acquisition of Medical Action Industries Inc. On October 1, 2014, we completed our acquisition of Medical Action Industries Inc., a leading producer of custom procedure traysAdvance the Company’s previously stated four-part strategy, and minor procedure kits, to broaden our service offering to provider and manufacturer customers and advance our strategy ofConnecting the World of Medical Products to the Point of Care™.

 

 3)Diversify the Company and its revenue/earnings profile into higher margin businesses through strategic transformational acquisitions that would further advance the Company’s strategy.

Recognizing the competitive pressures in the Domestic segment earnings (which makes up the vast majority of the Company’s revenue and operating earnings), in February 2017 the Compensation Committee approved the Company’s 2017 Annual Incentive Plan (“2017 AIP”) for our NEOs that would:

Reduce potential payouts compared to fiscal 2016 for performance at or below the Board-approved annual operating plan (“AOP”) such that reaching 100% of 2017 AOP target would result in 75% AIP performance; and

Further incentivize AOP outperformance with steeper leverage for potential payouts above target (as further discussed on page 43).”

2017 Financial and Operational Performance

In 2017, the Company made significant progress on each of the three items above to advance the Company’s business transformation:

 

1)

AcquisitionThe Company outperformed the RBT financial goals and successfully added in excess of ArcRoyal. On November 1, 2014, we completed our acquisition$50 million operating earnings through cost reductions and operational improvements to partially offset margin compression and further identified an additional approximately $150 million of Ireland-based surgical kitting company ArcRoyal, complementing the Medical Action acquisition and the Company’s existing unitized delivery capabilitiestotalrun-rate earnings deliverable by providing immediate access and global reach into European markets and beyond.2020;

 

 2)The Company made significant qualitative progress against its previously announced four-part strategy, highlighted below. The strategic transformation is a multi-year process and there is still progress to be made, as the Company will continue to pursue each of the four strategies.

Strategy  

Continued Integration2017  Accomplishment

Build the Most Efficient Route to MarketThe Company reduced operating expenses and made investments in capabilities (such asvoice-to-pick technologies); however, the Company did not fully attain its productivity goals for 2017.
Expand along the Continuum of Movianto. WeCare (COC)The Company acquired MoviantoByram Healthcare, greatly expanding its capabilities and platform along the COC. Additionally, the Company added an ambulatory surgery center customer with over 200 sites of care, further diversifying away from the acute setting to alternative points of care.
Become the Preferred Outsourcer to ManufacturersThe Company added strategic orthopedic product manufacturer customers, further leveraging its distribution network to provide outsourced supply-chain and logistics services to manufactures for their clinically relevant products; however, the Company did not fully meet its revenue and margin goals for this business unit in August 20122017.
Data Analytics & ServicesThe Company made investments in order to establish a Europeanits QSightTM inventory management platform and extend our global reachreorganized and enhanced its selling capabilities for QSightTM and its other technology and service solutions. Despite these investments, the Company did not fully meet its existing customer penetration goals in 2017 with new capabilitiesrespect to serve our health care manufacturer customers. During 2014, we continued to focus heavily on the integration of Movianto, making key management changes, centralizingits value-added and streamlining processes and services and re-structuring operations to reduce costs and realize efficiencies.service solutions.

 

 3)

Debt Refinancing. In the third quarter of 2014, Owens & Minor issued $275 million of 3.875% Senior Notes due 2021The Company made significant progress in transforming its earnings and $275 million of 4.375% Senior Notes due 2024. We used the proceeds from these offerings of approximately $446 millionrevenue profile to fund the acquisitions of Medical Action and ArcRoyal and to fund the early retirement of the Company’s 6.35% Senior Notes due 2016.

Continued Improvement to Logistics Infrastructure. We continued initiatives to optimize our network of distribution facilitieshigher-margin businesses through closure of small, less efficient distribution centers and opening of larger regional distribution centers with capabilities to provide a broader range of services to both our provider and manufacturer customers.

two strategic acquisitions:

Despite strong revenue growth,

The Company completed its acquisition of Byram Healthcare, the second largest U.S. home health distributor, on August 1, 2017, advancing its strategy to expand along the continuum of care; and

On November 1, 2017, the Company announced its pending $710 million acquisition of Halyard Health’s Surgical & Infection Protection (“S&IP”) business (anticipated to close early in the second quarter of 2018). The Company expects this acquisition to provide the Company with market-leading brands in certain product categories, the ability to have owned-brand products in excess of 10% of sales, and a scalable global manufacturing platform to leverage for future growth.

2017 Compensation Decisions

The Compensation Committee took the following significant strategic accomplishments, infrastructure improvements and efforts to assimilate our international operationscompensation actions in 2014,2017:

No NEO salaries were increased for 2017;

The 2017 AIP for our NEOs did not receive a payout under our annual incentive program because we did not achievewas designed so that NEOs would only earn 75% of target bonus opportunities for performance at the 100% level of the Board-approved AOP; and

Long-term incentives provided an additional opportunity that would only be earned if Company performance in 2019 returns to previously stated adjusted earnings per share growth goals.

In 2017, the Company and the NEOs successfully performed against a portion of the Company’s objectives, making significant progress on its business transformation while not meeting the target performance of adjusted operating earnings. The Company achieved annual GAAP earnings of $1.20 per share and adjusted earnings of $1.61 per share for 2017, with consolidated operating earnings of $89.3 million and adjusted consolidated operating earnings of $180 million. For the purposes of determining financial performance for the 2017 AIP, adjusted operating earnings was $166 million which was below the 2017 AOP target of $204 million but above threshold of $163.2 million.1.

We believe our 2017 compensation results are consistent with our 2017 operating performance and that the incentive awards earned by our executive officers reflected our performance and the performance of our NEOs in 2017.

2017 adjusted operating earnings performance resulted in NEOs earning a 37% of target payout for the financial component of the 2017 AIP (weighted 80% of the overall plan); and

The Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion on the individual Qualitative Performance Factor (“QPF”) component of the 2017 AIP (weighted 20% of the overall plan) for Messrs. Phipps, Meier, Colpo and Kordahi for failure to meet certain financial and operational goals (as further described on page 46).

Summary of 2017 Compensation Actions and Performance Pay Results

Our 2017 Annual Incentive Program (AIP) was a conditionstructured as follows:

LOGO

1Adjusted (non-GAAP) earnings and a reconciliation to its most comparable GAAP equivalent financial measure are described on page 17 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed with the SEC on February 23, 2018. In 2017, with the closing of the Byram Healthcare acquisition, the Company adopted a revised non-GAAP financial presentation that excludes amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets in addition to items otherwise excluded. The 2017 AIP targets were approved prior to this accounting change and therefore amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets was not excluded by the Compensation Committee for the purposes of determining financial performance for the 2017 AIP.

2017 Annual Incentive Results

Adjusted Operating Earnings was $166 million, equating to any payout37% attainment of the Annual Operating Earnings goal under the 2017 AIP for our NEOs.

Qualitative Performance Factor results varied for individual NEOs based on otherperformance againstpre-determined goals. After its review of each individual NEO’s performance, the Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion with respect to Messrs. Phipps, Meier, Colpo and Kordahi for failure to meet certain financial results. In addition, weand operational goals (as discussed on page 46).

2017 AIP payouts ranged from 33% to 37% of target for our NEOs.

Our 2017 Long-Term Incentive (LTI) program was structured as follows:

LOGO

Results for 2016 Performance Share Grant (FY 2016 and FY 2017 performance period):

The Company did not achieve our two-year performance targets forits LTI goals and therefore there was no payout on 2016-2017 LTI and all performance shares issued in 2013 and, consequently,related thereto did not pay out any sharesvest and were forfeited.

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) was less than 9% against a goal of 10% (and threshold of 9%).

Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share was $1.49 against a target of $2.12 (and threshold of $1.90).

Transformational Performance-Based Retention Equity Award

While the Compensation Committee lowered the 2017 AIP target bonus opportunity for achieving target AOP performance, the Compensation Committee wanted to our NEOs forensure that executives remain focused on translating the 2013-2014 performance cycle. However, after consideringnear-term investments and cost reductions into building a stronger Company long-term and delivering on the significant achievementsgoals of management (described above) to improve overall operations and advance the Company’s long-term strategy,strategic transformation. Therefore, the Committee approved an additional performance-based LTI opportunity designed to deliver the Company’s transformational agenda and earnings goals through 2019. The value of the award at the time of grant equaledone-half of the recipient’s annual LTI award value. These awards caused a modest increase in the total compensation for Messrs. Phipps, Meier and Colpo for 2017 as compared to 2016 as set forth in the Summary Compensation & Benefits Committee exercised its discretion to pay members of executive management a discretionary bonus of 10% of base salary (11.7% for the President & Chief Executive Officer). For more information about these discretionary bonuses, see “Discretionary Bonuses”Table on page 37 of this proxy statement.54. These awards, which are more fully described on page 48, are entirely performance-based and require stretch financial performance over a multi-year period in order to vest.

Owens & Minor’s Compensation Philosophy and Goals

The fundamental principle underlying Owens & Minor’s executive compensation program is that we pay for sustained performance, profitable growth and achievement of results. Our goal is to encourage sustained high Company

and individual performance within a framework that allows us to attract, retain and motivate management.our executives. Components of our executive compensation program are designed to create the appropriate balance between short- and long-term incentives and between fixed andat-risk compensation, to weigh cost against expected benefit and to align with the creation of shareholder value while promotingproviding market-competitive compensation packages that promote executive retention. These components include:

 

Annual cash incentives to drive critical business goals for each year.

 

Restricted stock and performance share grants to retain management and focus executives on longer- termlonger-term financial performance and execution of our operational and strategic plan.plans.

 

Reasonable but competitivemarket-competitive base salaries so executives are not motivated to take excessive risks.

 

Retirement, severance and other benefits to attract executive talent and encourage retention.

WeRisks of Compensation Program and Practices

With respect to our overall compensation programs, the Company periodically reviews our compensation policies and practices to ensure that they do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company or encourage inappropriate risk-taking by executives. Additionally, the Compensation Committee and its independent Compensation Consultant, Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC (“Semler Brossy”) consider risks when designing new executive compensation programs, and Semler Brossy periodically provides an external review of the programs and features of our programs and corporate governance policies that help mitigate risk. In October 2017, management engaged in a formal compensation risk review and assessment process with input from Semler Brossy. Based on this review and assessments, we believe that our executive compensation program, structuredprograms do not create risks that are reasonably likely to reward performancehave a material adverse effect on the Company or encourage our executives to take excessive or inappropriate risks for our business. Our compensation philosophy and create long-term shareholder value, has playedpractices continue to evolve into a significant role over the past decade in effectively motivating and rewarding management to meet the challengesmore market-driven pay structure with a lower percentage of our business and produce our many successes. Additionally, we believe the program generally alignsfixed pay and a higher percentage of variable and performance-based pay in order to enhance the program’s pay for performance as demonstrated by the non-payment of incentive payouts for 2014 based on company financial results.orientation. Further discussion and disclosure of the Company’s compensation policies and practices are included in the pages following this Executive Summary.

Summary of 2014 Pay Structure

LOGO

Executive Compensation Practices

Our compensation programprograms and practices are designed to meet compensation best practices and to drive performance that creates long-term shareholder value.

WHAT WE DO

 

 

þPay for Performance.    We link pay to performance. Aperformance and a significant portion of our executives’ potential total annual compensation, both cash and equity, is based on the achievement of objective, simple and transparent financial measures that are structured to enhance short-term and long-term performance.

 

þPerformance-Based Equity Awards.    One-halfAt least half of our annual equity award grants are performance shares with multi-year performance requirements and an additional year of restricted vesting on earned shares.

 

Share Ownership Guidelines.    We have established stock ownership guidelines for our officers, and all of our NEOs meet or exceed the established ownership guidelines (Mr. Morris-Hipkins and Mr. Kordahi, who joined the Company in 2017 and 2016, respectively, have five years from the date of hire to meet the guidelines and currently are on track to do so).
þLimited Perquisites.    We tie perquisites to a legitimate business purpose and limit the value provided to executive officers.
Double-Triggered Change in Control Provisions.    Equity vesting and severance payments and benefits based on a change in control require termination of employment following the change in control.
Recoupment Policy.    We have in place a recoupment policy to recover from our executives compensation paid under circumstances involving restatement of our financial statements due to misconduct.

 

þShare Ownership Guidelines.    Our Management Equity Ownership Program establishes stock ownership guidelines and, until 2014, provided incentives for achieving the requisite levels of stock ownership. All of our NEOs exceed the established ownership guidelines.

 

þLimited Perquisites.    We tie perquisites to a legitimate business purpose and limit the value provided to executive officers.

 

þDouble-Triggered Change in Control Provisions.    Equity vesting and severance payments and benefits based on a change in control require termination of employment following the change in control.

þRisk Mitigation.    We seek to mitigate risks associated with compensation by establishing caps on incentive compensation, multiple performance targets for earning incentive compensation and ongoing processes to identify and manage risk. We do not believe our compensation program creates risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company, which we confirm annually through a risk assessment of incentive-based compensation.

 

þIndependent Compensation Consulting Firm.    The Compensation & Benefits Committee receives advice about its compensation programs and practices from an independent consulting firm that provides no other services to the Company, and has nothe Company is not aware of any conflicts of interest with respect to its work.

WHAT WE DON’T DO

 

 

xNo Employment Agreements.    WeWhile we agreed to an employment term sheet upon the hiring of our new CEO in 2015, we do not otherwise have employment agreements with any of our NEOs.executive officers.

 

xNo Hedging.    We prohibit our executive officers and directors from hedging against the economic ownership of Company stock.

 

xNoPledging.    We strongly discourageprohibit our executive officers from pledging Company stock, and none of our NEOs currently has any such stock pledged.stock.

 

NoxRe-pricing No Re-pricingof Equity AwardsAwards.    Our stock plans do not permit there-pricing of equity awards.

 

xNoTaxGross-UpsGross-Ups.    We do not provide any taxgross-ups, including excise taxgross-ups on change in control severance payments and benefits.

Say-On-Pay Vote

In May 2014,2017, our shareholders approved the compensation of our NEOs for 20132016 in oursay-on-pay advisory vote with 94.6%over 94% of votes cast in support of the program. In light ofBased on this support, the Compensation & Benefits Committee made no material changes to the generalcore structure and philosophy behind our executive compensation program in 2014.2017 but continues to evaluate our pay programs and practices to ensure that they are both market competitive and equitable. At the 2015 annual meeting,our upcoming 2018 Annual Meeting, our shareholders will again holdprovide an advisory vote to approve 2017 executive compensation, for 2014. Theand the Compensation & Benefits Committee will continue to consider results from this year’s and futurethese advisory votes onin setting executive compensation.

The Process for Setting Executive Compensation

The Company’s executive compensation levels and programs are established, approved and administered by the Compensation & Benefits Committee, of the Board of Directors, which is currently composed of fourfive independent directors. The Compensation & Benefits Committee solicits the views of its independent outside consulting firm and senior management on incentive compensation and plan design issues. In addition, the Compensation & Benefits Committee sets performance goals and evaluates the performance of our Chief Executive Officer on an annual basis jointly with the Governance & Nominating Committee, and the Chief Executive Officer sets performance goals and provides performance evaluations of our other executive officers and makes recommendations as to their compensation levels. Our Chief Executive Officer does not make recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to his compensation and does not participate in Committee meetings when his compensation is discussed.

Independent Advisor.    The Compensation & Benefits Committee has the authority under its charter to retain independent consultants or advisors to assist it in gathering information and making decisions. Management may not engage any independent advisor retained by the Compensation & Benefits Committee to perform services without the prior approval of the committee, and no such engagement by management was undertaken in 2014.2017. The Compensation & Benefits Committee also obtains information and assistance from the Company’s Human Resources Departmenthuman resources and finance department in evaluating and making decisions on executive compensation.

The Compensation & Benefits Committee engagedcontinued to engage Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC (“Semler Brossy”) in 20142017 as its independent advisor to (1) provide recommendations in changes to our peer group; (2) provide guidance and advice in our search for new executive officers and the compensation package offered to those new leaders; (3) analyze competitive levels of each element of compensation and total compensation for each of the NEOsexecutive officers relative to our peer group and industry trends; (3)(4) provide information regarding executive compensation trends and regulatory changes and developments; and (4)(5) provide input on annual and long-term incentive design.design; and (6) periodically assist in conducting a risk assessment of our compensation programs, policies and practices. The Compensation & Benefits Committee has analyzed whether the work of Semler Brossy has raised any conflict of interest and has concluded that the work of our advisor, including the individuals employed by our advisor who provide consulting services to the committee, has not created any conflict of interest. The Compensation & Benefits Committee also considered and confirmed the independence of legal advisors retained during 2014.2017.

Factors Used to Determine Executive Compensation.    Consistent with past years, the Compensation & Benefits Committee considered a variety of factors in making decisions regarding compensation for our NEOs in 2014.2017. The primary factors were as follows:

Performance.    Performance.    Our policy is to provide executive officers with compensation opportunities that are based upon Company performance their individual performance and their contribution to Company performance.

Mix of Short-Term and Long-Term Compensation.    Compensation.    Because the successful operation of our business requires a long-term approach, one element of our executive compensation program is long-term compensation. Although we have never had specific policies on the percentage of total compensation that should be short-term versus long-term, we considered this relationship in determining the overall balance and reasonableness of our

executives’ total direct compensation packages. We believe that short-term compensation is necessary in conjunction with long-term compensation to provide remuneration for performance of the short-term goals or milestones that ultimately lead to achievement of our long-term objectives and strategic initiatives. In 2017, the Compensation Committee gave additional consideration to the Company’s transformational and strategic acquisition activities and the importance of incentivizing and retaining key leaders to deliver upon these long-term goals.

Mix of Performance-Based Compensation.    Compensation.    To create a strong link between pay and performance, a significant portion of compensation is based on the achievement of objective financial measures. We have no

specific policies on the percentage of total compensation that should be “performance-based,” but consider this relationship in determining the overall balance and reasonableness of the executives’ total direct compensation packages.

Impact and Mix of Cash vs.Non-Cash Compensation.     Compensation.    We consider both the cost and the motivational value of the various components of compensation. Although we have no specific policies on the percentage of total compensation that should be “cash versus equity,” we consider this relationship in determining the overall balance and reasonableness of the executives’ total direct compensation packages.

Peer Group Comparisons.    Comparisons.    Each year, we evaluate our compensation levels and programs through comparisons to available information for a group of peer companies selected by the Compensation & Benefits Committee (“Peer Companies”) based in part on recommendations from and analyses prepared by our compensation advisors. This evaluation helps us to assess whether our level and mix of executive pay is competitive and reasonable when compared to certain industry standards.

For 2014, we used a peer group of 12 companies. In general, the Peer Companies were selected because they are in health care distribution or other distribution industries and have after consideration of the following factors:

Quantitative Factors:revenue, net income, total assets, and/or market capitalization (the “Size Indicators”) that align reasonably closely with those

Qualitative Factors:business model (health care services, health care distribution and companies from other distribution industries) and geography

Our Peer Companies include a mix of health care distribution and companies from other distribution industries in order to capture companies of comparable business model and size to us. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the Company. The peer group also includes MeadWestvaco Corporation,to ensure it remains appropriate and relevant as a Richmond, Virginia-based company with which we believemarket reference and modifies the Company competes geographically for executive talent. These Peer Companies arepeer group as follows:

2014 Peer Companies

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

Patterson Companies, Inc.

Con-Way, Inc.

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Genuine Parts Company

United Natural Foods, Inc.

Henry Schein, Inc.

United Stationers Inc.

JB Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

W.W. Grainger, Inc.

MeadWestvaco Corporation

Nash Finch Company

necessary to reflect changes at Owens & Minor, among the peers or within the industry. Relative to the Size IndicatorsQuantitative Factors of the Peer Companies, the CompanyOwens & Minor generally ranks between the 25th percentile and median of the peer group. The Peer Companies used for 2017 consisted of the following:

2017 Peer Companies

Anixter International

Synnex Corp.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

United Natural Foods, Inc.

Essendant Inc.

Univar, Inc.

Genuine Parts Company

WESCO International

Henry Schein, Inc.

VWR Corporation

J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

WestRock Co.

Patterson Companies, Inc.

Using the Peer Companies, Semler Brossy analyzed the compensation components and levels as reported for the named executive officer positionsNEOs of the Peer Companies and prepared a comparison of 20142017 target total direct compensation and each element thereof to reported information for the Peer Companies. Based on this analysis,The Compensation Committee also considered data from

a Towers Watson General Industry survey, using a survey cut incorporating a discount to Owens & Minor’s revenue in light of thelow-margin nature of the Company’s business relative to general industry companies. When the Compensation & Benefits Committee determined that it is appropriate to target total compensation for our NEOs up to the median relative toreviews data from the Peer Companies, it considers the 50th percentile of the group as a reference point for positioning target total compensation. This is a reference point, not a policy, and to payactual compensation may be above or below the target level based on actual performance. The target total direct compensation (sum of base salaries, annual incentive opportunities and equity awards) for all NEOs is below median relative toData from the Peer Companies generally dueis one of a number of factors considered by the Compensation Committee when determining each executive’s pay. Other factors considered during this process include, but are not limited to, lower levelsthe executive’s performance, internal equity of equity awards.pay, general market competitiveness and whether or not the executive participates in thenow-frozen Company SERP program.

Tally Sheets.    Sheets.    We also review total compensation levels for executive officers at least annually through the use of tally sheets that quantify each element of direct and indirect compensation provided to individual executives and the portion of the executive’s total compensation represented by each element of compensation. This annual review of tally sheets also includes information on the value of executives’ unexercised stock options and outstanding stockequity awards, as well as an evaluation of the payments and benefits that would be paid to executive officers in the event of termination of employment, including retirement or following a change in control of the Company. While providing additional context to us in making compensation decisions, the information from the tally sheets regarding unexercised stock options, outstanding stockequity awards and termination payments and benefits generally does not affect our compensation decisions for the NEOs. This reflects our view that an executive’s compensation level should be based on the Company’s performance, the executive’s performance and the executive’s contribution to the Company’s performance.

Total Program Cost.    Cost.    We consider the cost (including aggregate share usage and dilution) of the various components of our compensation program in evaluating the overall balance and reasonableness of our executives’ total direct compensation packages.

Risk Considerations.    Considerations.    In setting executive compensation, the Compensation & Benefits Committee reviews the various components of our program to consider whether they are appropriately structured to promote the achievement of our business goals without encouraging the taking of unnecessary risks. We believe that several elements of our program mitigate risks associated with performance-based compensation, including the following:

 

  

Limits on Incentive Compensation. Awards under our annual incentive program are capped at 200% of the executive’s target award to protect against excessive short-term incentives, and the Compensation & Benefits Committee has discretion to reduce awards based on factors it deems appropriate, including whether officers took unnecessary risks.

 

  

Performance Metrics. We use a combination of financial performance metrics (net revenue, net income and return on average assets) for our annual incentive program that emphasizes profitable and disciplined growth and requires responsible and risk-based decision- makingdecision-making by our executives.

 

  

Performance Shares/Long-Term Equity Awards. Approximately one-halfAt least half of an executive’s equity compensation each year consists of performance shares with atwo-year performance cycle and an additional year of service-based vesting, which focuses management on sustaining the Company’s longer-term performance. The other halfportion of an executive’s equity compensation each year consists of restricted stock awards that vest over a period of at least three years and, accordingly, further encourages a focus on long-term performance.

 

  

Share Ownership Guidelines. Our share ownership guidelines ensure that our executives have a substantial stake tied to long-term holdings in Owens & Minor stock.

Recoupment Policy. Performance-based cash and equity compensation to our executive officers is subject to recoupment under circumstances involving misconduct that results in a restatement of our financial statements.

Elements of Compensation

In an effort to achieve the objectives identified above, our 2017 executive compensation framework consistsconsisted of the following elements as further described below:

 

Element  Description  Purpose
Base Salary  Fixed cash  Provides a fixed amount of cash compensation to allow us to recruit and retain key talent
  
Annual Incentives  Cash awarded annually for performance against revenue, income, return on average assetsadjusted operating earnings metrics and qualitative performance factorfactors  To motivate executive officers’ performance in achieving our current-year business goals
   
Long-Term Incentives  

Performance shares and restricted stock

 

•     Restricted stock vests 3 years from date of grant

•  Performance shares are earned if the Company achieves goalsreturn on consolidated operating earnings, domestic operating earnings,capital employed and international operating earnings.adjusted diluted EPS metrics. Performance is measured over a2-year period and, if earned, shares vest at the end of 3 years from date of awardaward.

•  Restricted stock vests 3 years from date of grant

•  For 2017, additional performance shares were awarded to the NEOs and certain other employees of the Company in order to incentivize and retain key leaders and high-performing teammates to deliver the Company’s transformational agenda and earnings goals through 2019.

  Rewards performance that enhances shareholder value through the use of equity-based awards that link compensation to the value of our Common Stock and the achievement of multi-year performance goals; strengthens the alignment of management and shareholder interests by creating meaningful levels of Company stock ownership by management
  
Deferred Compensation Plan  Officers may defer salary and cash bonuses into a plan that provides for investment options similar to the Company’s 401(k) planplan.  Provides a tax efficient opportunity to save for retirement and to ensure that our executive compensation program remains competitive in the marketplace for key executive talent
   

Retirement/Post-Termination

Compensation

  Participation in Company’s 401(k) plan and matching contributions similar to other teammates. SERP (frozen as of March 2012) available to legacy NEOs only (see Summary Compensation Table, Note 3).  Provides security for the future needs of the executives and their families

We believe that the elements of our executive compensation framework support short-term and long-term performance goals by providing our executive officers with an appropriate mix of compensation elements that include (1) fixed annual compensation, (2) target-based annual and long-term incentive compensation and (3) security for the future needs of the executives and their families in the form of retirement and termination benefits.

Base Salary

AllWhile we agreed to an employment term sheet upon the hiring of our new CEO in 2015, our executive officers are otherwise employed on an “at will” basis and there are nowithout employment agreements. We review base salaries each April.

In making base salary decisions in April 2014, the Compensation & Benefits Committee considered:generally considers:

(1) Individual attributes of each NEO (such as responsibilities, skills, leadership and experience),

(2) Individual and overall Company performance levels,

(3) The officer’s expected future contributions to the Company, and

(4) Overall market-competitiveness of the officer’s base salary.

We also considered thatIn 2017, the targeted average percentage salary increase for non-executive Company teammates was approximately 2.0% in 2014. In addition, we reviewed competitive comparisons prepared by Semler Brossy indicating that our base salary levels were generally above median versus the Peer Companies even though target total direct compensation was below the median. Based on the factors above, we gave each of the NEOs a merit increase in base salary of up to 2.0%. We believed that these relatively modest increases in salary levels reflect the performance of each of the officers balanced against economic conditions, averageCompensation Committee did not approve salary increases being received by other Company teammatesfor our NEOs and all NEO salaries were held at the 2016 level. In making this decision, the Compensation Committee gave significant weight to the Company’s expected financial performance level in 2017 and the Company’s above-median base salary levels relative to the Peer Companies. In addition, as reflectedfact that financial goals for 2017 were well-below actual financial performance delivered in the table below, Mr. Bierman received an increase in base salary2016 due to his promotion to President & Chief Executive Officerexpected margin pressures and Ms. den Hartog received an additional adjustment based on her assumption of additional responsibilities for regulatory functions and resulting additional direct reports.

  Name  

2014 Base Salary

Amount

   

2014 Base Salary

Increase Percentage

  Reason for Increase
    

  Craig R. Smith (1)

   923,186     2 Merit
    

  James L. Bierman (2)

   850,000     21 

Merit and promotion to President

& Chief Executive Officer

    

  Richard A. Meier

   586,500     2 Merit
    

  Erika T. Davis

   504,900     2 Merit
    

  Charles C. Colpo

   434,879     2 Merit
    

  Grace R. den Hartog (3)

   445,000     7 Merit and assumption of additional responsibilities
    

  Brian J. Shotto

   495,000     0 N/A

(1) Mr. Smith’s base salary was reduced from $923,186 to $750,000 effective September 1, 2014 when he moved from the Chairman & Chief Executive Officer position to Executive Chairman.

(2) Mr. Bierman received a 2% merit increasecompetitive dynamics in April 2014 for a base salary of $714,000 and an additional increase to $850,000 effective September 1, 2014 when he was promoted to President & Chief Executive Officer.our Domestic business.

(3) In April 2014, Ms. den Hartog received a 2% merit increase plus an additional 4.58% adjustment to reflect the assumption of additional responsibilities for regulatory functions and resulting additional direct reports.

Annual Incentives

We provide annual incentive opportunities to executive officers to motivate their performance in achieving our current-year business goals. Each year, we establish a business planan AOP for the forthcomingthat year that includes financial, strategic and other goals for the Company and that is approved by the Board of Directors. Annual incentive goals for the executive officers are set based on the approved business plan (the “Annual Incentive Program”).AOP. These goals are weighted to reflect their relative importance and contribution to overall Company performance.

For the 2014 Annual Incentive Program and consistent with past years, the Compensation & Benefits Committee set target annual incentive opportunities at 75% of base salary for the Chief Executive Officer and 50% of base salary for each of the other NEOs, subject to the achievement of the Company’s established performance goals. The Chief Executive Officer has a higher Target Payout Amount than the other NEOs, reflecting the broader scope of his responsibilities and authority and his greater ability to impact the Company’s performance.

The performance metrics (“Performance Metrics”) established for determining the Target Payout Amount that could be paidfor the 2017 AIP were:

 

Company Net RevenueAdjusted Operating Earnings comprising 80% of the Performance Metric with the following targets:

 

Company Net Income

Company Return on Average Assets

Performance
Metrics
 Weighting 

Threshold (1)

35%

Target (1)

75%

Maximum (1)

200%

Adjusted Operating Earnings

80$163.2 million$204 million$244.8 million

 

A Qualitative Performance Factor, or QPF, (i.e., individual goals) comprising 20% of the Performance Metric

In addition, none of the foregoing Performance Metrics could result in a payout unless the Company achieved an adjusted diluted EPSoperating earnings for 20142017 of at least $1.80$130 million (the “EPS Qualifier”“Qualifier”).

The Compensation & Benefits Committee selected, and the Board of Directors approved, the EPS Qualifier and each of the Performance Metrics, including the weights assigned to them and the target achievement levels in March 20142017 based on discussions with and recommendations by senior management, the approved business plan for 2014 and2017 AOP, the growth and operational improvements called for in our strategic plan.plan and transformational agenda, and consultations with Semler Brossy. The specificCommittee selected Adjusted Operating Earnings as the financial Performance Metric for our annual cash incentive plan because this metric:

is a common metric to all of our business units,

is widely understood by our teammates and the internal metric of greatest focus,

is one of the most important underlying drivers of business performance and other financial metrics (such as adjusted diluted EPS, operating cash flow and return on invested capital),

is aligned with creating shareholder value as sustained adjusted operating earnings is both highly correlated with share price growth and a key driver of free cash flow to shareholders which is also highly correlated to equity value,

is aligned with our investor communications and the area of focus of our investor base, and

is in part driven by our performance of our transformation agenda and RBT initiatives.

The Compensation Committee’s goal in setting the target achievement levels was to provide management with challenging yet reasonably achievable goals that would lead the Company to meeting its 2017 business plan and position the Company to ultimately achieve the growth, transformation and improvement targets in our strategic plan without encouraging excessive risk-taking behavior. We believe that the use of a key financial performance metric that rewards profitable growth, as well as a qualitative performance metric to assess individual efforts and goal achievement, provides a balanced assessment of performance. The Compensation Committee retains authority to reduce or eliminate incentive compensation, which allows the committee to make judgments as to compensation it believes is excessive in light of performance as well as to monitor and respond to any behavior that it believes could be detrimental to the Company.

In structuring the 2017 financial Performance Metrics, the Compensation Committee took into account several unique factors for 2017 including (1) that expected 2017 financial results were selected because net incomeexpected to be lower than 2016 performance, (2) that the Company’s Domestic business segment was facing margin compression and net revenue, together with effective asset management, areintensifying competitive dynamics, and (3) that the most criticalCompany needed to retain and incentivize key leaders, including the NEOs, to deliver 2017 performance areasand reposition and transform the Company for the Company and key indicators of successful growth and management. They also constitute simple, objective and transparent criteria by which to measure performance.

In addition, in 2014,future. As a result, the Compensation & Benefits Committee structured the financial performance metrics to allow forpro-rated AIP payout at a lower threshold (80% of AOP achievement), reduced payout of AIP at 100% AOP attainment and a steeper AIP curve for performance in excess of 100% of AOP. Additionally, no amount would be payable in

respect of any Performance Metrics for achievement below the Threshold Payout Amount or if the Company did not achieve the Qualifier. The AIP structure resulted in a 2017 AIP curve as follows:

LOGO

The Company’s 2017 adjusted operating earnings performance of $166 million resulted in achievement of 37% of target for the financial component of the NEO’s 2017 AIP (weighted 80% of the overall plan).

Originally introduced in 2015, the Compensation Committee retained a Qualitative Performance FactorQPF as an additionala performance metric that, subject to meeting the EPS Qualifier, would allow a portion of any incentive compensation earned by the NEOs to be based on an overall assessment of the NEO’s job performance relative to leadership, goal implementation,performance against position-specific goals, strategic focus, management skills and other factors. The Compensation & Benefits Committee believed it was important to includebelieves that inclusion of the Qualitative Performance Factor asQPF is a way to reward strong performance and leadership provided by management that may or may not have translated into achievement of other financial and operating targets during the year, but that were nonetheless important achievements believed to contributecontributing to future value creation. The NEOs’ individual performance goals and key performance indicators that were used to determine the NEOs QPF included the following:

 NEOIndividual Performance Goal

 P. Cody Phipps

 Chairman, President & Chief  Executive Officer

•  Drive business performance

Ø  Achieve 2017 financial goals

Ø  Deliver RBT financial and operational goals

Ø  Mitigate competitive risks to business

•  Build leadership talent and capabilities to enhance our execution

•  Develop & advance our enterprise strategy

Ø  Execute on stated four-part strategy

Ø  Transform & strengthen business through strategic, transformational M&A

•  Develop as CEO, enhance Company culture & build confidence with key stakeholders

Ø  Lead “Purpose Driven Culture” through teammate engagement

Ø  Strengthen confidence with investors

Ø  Build & strengthen relationship with customers

 NEOIndividual Performance Goal

 Richard A. Meier

 Executive Vice President,

 Chief Financial Officer &

 President, International

•  Achieve 2017 financial goals (including within the International segment)

•  Drive the RBT process and create momentum toward 2020run-rate financial performance

•  Execute strategic M&A transactions to transform andre-position the Company

 Stuart Morris-Hipkins

 Executive Vice President,

 Manufacturing Services

•  Develop global manufacturing services strategy

•  Enhance margin and profitability for manufacturing service business unit

•  Develop and implement customer-level financial reporting and operational metrics

 Rony C. Kordahi

 Executive Vice President,

 North American Operations

•  Realize continuous improvement savings

•  Deliver financial goals identified in the RBT

•  Drive standard operating procedures & productivity

 Charles C. Colpo

 Senior Vice President,

 Owens & Minor Europe Operations

•  Execute International Segment growth strategy

•  Deliver International Segment financial results

•  Enhance International Segment IT platform to make it a competitivedifferentiator

The Compensation & Benefits Committee’s goalCommittee reviewed the performance of each individual NEO against his respective goals. After review, the Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion for 2017 incentive awards as they relate to Messrs. Phipps, Meier, Kordahi and Colpo as a result of: for Mr. Phipps, the Company’s 2017 overall financial performance, financial performance of our International segment and failure to fully-meet operational productivity goals in settingDomestic segment; for Mr. Meier, the target achievement levels wasCompany’s 2017 overall financial performance and the financial performance of our International segment; for Mr. Colpo, the financial performance of our International segment; and, for Mr. Kordahi, the Company’s failure to provide management with challenging yet what it believed were reasonably achievablefully-meet operational productivity goals that would lead the Company to meeting its 2014 business plan and position us to ultimately achieve the growth and improvement targets in our strategic plan without encouraging excessive risk-taking behavior. We believe thatDomestic segment. The exercise of negative discretion resulted in attainment of the useQPF at 18.5% for each of three different financial performance metrics that reward revenue growth but emphasize profitable growth with effective asset management as well as a qualitative performance metric to assess individual effortsMessrs. Phipps, Meier, Kordahi and goal achievement provides a balanced assessment of performance.Colpo. The Compensation & Benefits Committee retains authority to reduce or eliminate incentive compensation, which allows us to monitor and respond to any behaviordetermined that we believe could be detrimental toMr. Morris-Hipkins had met his 2017 QPF goals at the Company.

The achievement levels for the financial Performance Metrics were structured to provide for a Target Payout Amount as well as a maximum of two times the Target Payout Amount and a threshold of 25% of the Target Payout Amount. No amount would be payable in respect of any Performance Metrics for achievement below the Threshold Payout Amount or if the Company did not achieve the EPS Qualifier.full 37% level.

The table below sets forth (i) the four Performance Metrics, their respective weightings, achievement levels at threshold, target and maximum as well as actual results in 20142017 for each financial Performance Metric and (ii) the EPS Qualifier and actual achievement level required for the payment of any incentive compensation under the Annual Incentive Program.

20142017 Performance Metric Achievement Levels and Actual Results

 

Performance Metrics Weighting 

Threshold (1)

25%

  

Target (1)

100%

  

Maximum (1)

200%

  

2014

Actual Results

  

2014

Actual

Achievement

Company Net Revenue

($ thousands)

 20% $8,810,000   $9,177,000   $9,544,000   $9,440,000   172%

Company Net Income (2)

($ thousands)

 40% $109,000   $128,000   $144,000   $110,000   29%

Company Return on Average Assets

 20%  5.0%      5.4%      5.8%    4.3%   0%

Qualitative Performance Factor

 20%  N/A    N/A    N/A    N/A   N/A

EPS Qualifier for Receipt of Any Incentive Compensation Payout (3)

 N/A $1.80   $1.80   $1.80   $1.76   No
Performance Metrics  Weighting  

Threshold (1)

35%

  

Target (1)

75%

  

Maximum (1)

200%

  2017
Results (2)
  

2017

Achievement

Company Adjusted Operating Earnings (1)(2)

 80%  $163.2 million   $204 million   $244.8 million   $166 million  37%

Qualitative Performance Factor

 20%  N/A   N/A   N/A   See footnote (3)  See footnote (3)

Qualifier

 N/A  $130 million   N/A   N/A   $166 million  Yes

(1) For achievement levels above threshold but below target or above target but below maximum, payout amounts would be calculated based on a straight-line interpolation of the achievement level above threshold or target, as applicable.

(2) For purposes of the 2014 Annual Incentive Program, actual results exclude the following (net of tax) from net income: acquisition-related costs and exit and realignment charges of $35.3 million, loss on early retirement of debt of $9.1 million, fair value adjustments related to purchase accounting of $(4.7) million and an accrual for a breach of contract settlement of $3.9 million.

(3) For purposes of the 2014 Annual Incentive Program, the EPS Qualifier was based on adjusted net income as described in footnote (2) above.

Because the Company did not achieve the EPS Qualifier of at least $1.80 per share, no incentives were paid under the Annual Incentive Program to the NEOs for 2014 performance.

Discretionary Bonuses

Despite non-achievement of the EPS Qualifier under the 2014 Annual Incentive Program that prevented a payout to our executive officers, the Compensation & Benefits Committee determined to award each of the current NEOs discretionary bonuses as shown in the table below for the following reasons:

The executive officers successfully implemented strategic goals of the Company in 2014 by completing the acquisition of both a domestic and an international kitting company to enhance the Company’s product offerings and unitized product delivery capabilities in the United States and

abroad. The Compensation & Benefits Committee believes that these acquisitions provide the platform for future growth and capabilities to realize financial results following successful integration.

The executive officers continued to implement significant measures both domestically and abroad to make the Company’s supply chain infrastructure more efficient and streamlined.

The Compensation & Benefits Committee wanted to provide some level of recognition of the management team’s success in accomplishing certain of the Company’s strategic goals and managing through challenges in the marketplace and operations despite non-achievement of payouts under the 20142017 Annual Incentive Program, and believed thatin accordance with the discretionary bonuses awarded were conservative in amount yet an acknowledgementterms of forward progressthe program as approved by the Company.Compensation Committee, adjusted results for the applicable performance metrics as provided in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed with the SEC on February 23, 2018. In 2017, the Company adopted a revisednon-GAAP financial presentation that excludes amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets in addition to items otherwise excluded. The 2017 AIP targets were approved prior to this accounting change and therefore amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets has not been excluded in this table.

While(3) As discussed in this CD&A, in determining achievement of the QPF for each NEO, the Compensation & Benefits Committee considered thatreviewed their accomplishments and contributions in 2017 results as well as performance of their individual goals. QPF for our NEOs ranged between 18.5% and 37%.

Based on the discretionary bonuses would not qualify as performance-based compensationforegoing results and the Compensation Committee’s review of individual NEO performance, each NEO received the following payout under Section 162(m) of the IRC, it believed that the acknowledgement of senior management’s efforts and progress in creating a platform for growth and improved efficiency outweighed the potential non-deductibility of a portion of these bonuses.2017 AIP:

 

Name  Bonus Amount*     

Craig R. Smith

  $75,000  

James L. Bierman

   99,167  

Richard A. Meier

   58,650  

Erika T. Davis

   50,490  

Charles C. Colpo

   43,488  

Grace R. den Hartog

   44,500  
Name2017 AIP Target 
as  % of Base Salary 
 2017 AIP Target ($) 

Financial
 Performance Results 

(80% weighting)

QPF
Results

(20%
 weighting) 

2017 AIP 

2017 AIP as 

% of Target 

P. Cody Phipps

 125%$1,153,125 37% 18.5%$383,991 33%

Richard A. Meier

 75%$489,871 37% 18.5%$163,127 33%

StuartMorris-Hipkins

 70%$297,500 37% 37%$91,730 37%

Charles C. Colpo

 50%$228,448 37% 18.5%$76,073 33%

Rony C. Kordahi

 70%$315,000 37% 18.5%$104,895 33%

* Bonus amounts were calculated at 10% of each NEO’s base salary except that(1) Mr. Bierman’s bonus was 11.7% of base salary.Morris-Hipkins’ 2017 incentive payout ispro-rated based on time in position during 2017 (10 months)

Long-Term Incentives

Our shareholder-approved 2015 Stock Incentive Plan permits us to award grants ofnon-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock awards, performance share awards, stock units and stock appreciation rights. Except in instances of initial executive hiring, job promotions, retention concerns and similar circumstances, we grant equity awards to executive officersone-time each year. The Company’s long-term incentive program is focused on rewarding performance that

enhances shareholder value through the use ofCompensation Committee’s decision to grant equity-based awards is discretionary and largely determined by the Company’s longer-term financial performance, strategic accomplishments and individual contributions. Equity award decisions may also be based upon individual performance, expected future performance, job promotions and the assumption of greater responsibility within the Company. We strive to maintain an appropriate balance between the aggregate number of shares used for equity grants (relative to the competitive landscape) and shareholder interests.

We make annual equity award grants to senior management in two forms: (1) restricted stock that linkvests after a three-year period during which the officer is continuously employed by the Company; and (2) performance share awards that are earned based on achievement of designated performance metrics over atwo-year period followed by aone-year holding period during which the officer must remain in the Company’s employ. We believe that the mix between these vehicles helps provide a balance between linking compensation to the value of our Common Stock and achievement of multi-year performance goals and

strengthens strengthening the alignment of management and shareholder interests by creating meaningful levels of Company stock ownership by management. The Company has not issued stock options to its officers since 2007.

Our long-term incentive program had two components in 2014: (1) annual equity awards and (2) the Management Equity Ownership Program (“MEOP”). Although the NEOs received equity dividends under the MEOP in 2014 relative to achieving the requirements of that program as of the end of 2013, effective for calendar year 2014 and beyond, we have discontinued future payment of MEOP dividends to our executives for achieving and maintaining Common Stock ownership levels under the MEOP. Instead, the committee will take prior MEOP dividend amounts and continuing stock ownership expectations into consideration in establishing long-term incentive grant guidelines for the executive officers.

In accordance with our standard practice, the grant of the 20142017 annual equity awards was made at the first meeting of our Board in 20142017 on February 6, 2014,9, 2017, a date that is scheduled more than one year in advance. The grant values are based on the closing price of the stock on the date of grant and the number of shares subject to the award. The Company’s equity grants to officers consist of restricted stock and performance shares subject to three-year vesting periods; the Company has not issued stock options to its officers since 2007.

When making 20142017 long-term incentive equity award determinations, the Compensation & Benefits Committee focused on the Company’s longer-term financial performance and balanced the need to align the NEOs’ financial interests with those of shareholders against considerations regarding the affordability of equity grants, including aggregate share usage, dilution and accounting costs. We have historically been conservative and below median relative to the Peer Companies in grantingour equity awards under our long-term incentive programaward grants to minimize share usage, dilution and accounting costs.costs but are gradually evolving to increased long-term incentives (with more performance shares) relative to other elements of compensation in an effort to make our compensation program more performance-based and market driven.

PursuantAdditionally, as discussed earlier in this CD&A, in 2017 the Compensation Committee granted additional Performance Shares designed to retain and incentivize NEOs and certain key leaders to deliver the Company’s long-term incentive program,transformational agenda and financial performance through December 31, 2019. Vesting of these Performance Shares is contingent on the NEOs receivedCompany reaching certain levels of adjusted earnings per share for calendar year 2019. The Company expects to disclose the results of these awards in its 2020 proxy statement after the performance period has concluded and financial performance has been measured.

Based on the foregoing considerations, the Compensation Committee granted the following long-term incentive awards in 20142017 having the followingindicated grant date fair values:

 

    2014 Long-Term Incentive Awards (1) 
Name  

Performance

Shares

(2)

   

Restricted

Stock

(3)

   

MEOP
Performance Shares/
Restricted

Stock

(4)

   Total 

Mr. Smith

  $400,005    $400,005    $204,200    $1,004,210  

Mr. Bierman

   705,014     705,014     184,757     1,594,785  

Mr. Meier

   200,002     200,002     90,397     490,401  

Ms. Davis

   162,494     162,494     33,043     358,031  

Mr. Colpo

   105,005     105,005     37,442     247,452  

Ms. den Hartog

   162,494     162,494     33,983     358,971  

Mr. Shotto

   162,494     162,494     46,878     371,866  
2017 Long-Term Incentive Awards (1) 
Name  

Performance

Shares

(2)

   

Restricted

Stock

(3)

   

Transformation
Performance
Shares

(4)

   Sign-on
Award of
Restricted
Stock
   Total 

P. Cody Phipps

  $2,000,007   $2,000,007   $999,986   $—     $5,000,001 

Randy R. Meier

   350,015    350,015    350,015    —      1,050,044 

Stuart Morris-Hipkins (5)

   350,017    350,017    350,000    285,004    1,335,037 

Charlie C. Colpo

   155,993    155,993    155,993    —      467,979 

Rony C. Kordahi

   350,015    350,015    350,015    —      1,050,044 

(1) The amounts shown are the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and, in the case of performance shares, are based on probable achievement at target levels.

(2) These performance shares generally require achievement by the Company of specific financial metrics (discussed below) for fiscal years 20142017 and 20152018 as a condition to issuance of the underlying shares of restricted stock (which, if earned, would vest on the third anniversary of the performance share award). OfAmounts in the performance shares awardedtable reflect the values if achieved at the target level. Mr. Phipps’ long-term incentive compensation and equity targets are higher relative to Mr. Bierman, $455,011 were awarded in connection withthe other NEOs to reflect the broader scope of his promotion in September 2014responsibilities and authority and his greater ability to President & Chief Executive Officer, are based on achievement of specified performance metrics during fiscal year 2015 and, if earned, would be immediately vested.impact the Company’s performance.

(3) These shares of restricted stock vest three years from the date of grant based on the executive’sexecutive��s continued employment with the Company. Of

(4) The performance shares were a special, unique award designed to retain NEOs and incentivize delivery of our transformation and 2019 financial goals. Amounts in the table reflect the values if achieved at the target level.

(5)Sign-on time-based restricted stock awards to Mr. Bierman, $455,011 was awardedgranted in connection with his promotion in September 2014 to President & Chief Executive Officer.

(4) These awards were granted in February 2014 and were based on the officers’ achievementcommencement of their respective 2013 target ownership amounts under the MEOP as of December 31, 2013. Each officer, except Mr. Bierman, Mr. Meier and Mr. Shotto, received his or her award in additional performance shares (described in (2) above). Awards to Mr. Bierman, Mr. Meier and Mr. Shotto were paid in shares of restricted stock that vest five years from the date of grant. See discussion of our MEOP on page 41 of this proxy statement.

Annual Equity Awards.    Our shareholder-approved 2005 Stock Incentive Plan permits us to award grants of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock awards, performance share awards and stock appreciation rights. Except in instances of initial executive hiring, job promotions and similar circumstances, we grant equity awards to executive officers one time each year. The Compensation & Benefits Committee’s decision to grant equity-based awards is discretionary and largely determined by the Company’s longer-term financial performance, strategic accomplishments and individual contributions. Equity award decisions may also be based upon outstanding individual performance, expected future performance, job promotions and the

assumption of greater responsibility withinemployment with the Company. We strive to maintain an appropriate balance between the aggregate number of shares used for equity grants (relative to the competitive landscape) and shareholder interests.

In 2014, the Compensation & Benefits Committee granted equity awards to the NEOs consisting of 50% service-based restricted stock that vests three years from the date of grant and 50% performance shares, which are earned only if the Company achieves specified financial metrics for calendar years 2014 and 2015. If performance requirements are met, the performance shares are paid in the form of restricted stock that vests on the third anniversary of the performance share award. If performance requirements are not met, the award is forfeited.

Prior to 2013, performance share grants were based on achievement of a single operating earnings metric. In 2013, we established three separate and weighted metrics for the performance share grant to include consolidated operating earnings, domestic operating earnings and international average return on invested capital (“ROIC”). In 2014, we replaced the international ROIC metric with an international operating earnings metric to focus officers on profitably growing both our domestic and international operations while maintaining the overall operating earnings metric to reflect total Company performance. The table below shows the metrics, weights and performance levels established for the 20142017 performance share awards. The Compensation Committee approved 2017 adjusted earnings per share (adjusted diluted EPS) andtwo-year (2017-2018) average return on capital employed (ROCE), weighted 80% and 20%, respectively, as metrics for the long-term incentive performance shares that were granted in 2017. The Compensation Committee choose adjusted diluted EPS as a financial metric because this metric:

is the metric of greatest attention by analysts and our investors,

is aligned with shareholder value as sustained adjusted diluted EPS growth is both highly correlated with share price growth and adjusted diluted EPS is a key driver of free cash flow to shareholders which is also highly correlated to equity value,

is consistent with our message to shareholders that our focus is on consistent earnings growth,

is widely understood by award recipients, and

is impacted and driven in part by our performance of Transformation Agenda initiatives.

In addition to adjusted diluted EPS, the Compensation Committee selected ROCE as a performance metric because:

the metric captures management’s ability to create value through better balance sheet management,

the metric measures profitability and value creation over time as derived from the Company’s use of capital which can create value for shareholders, and

a significant portion of our shareholder base and analysts believe that efficient use of capital employed is an important metric of our performance.

20142017 Performance Share AchievementAward Metrics

 

Performance Metric (1)  Weight  

Maximum

200%

   

Target

100%

   

Minimum

>0

 

Growth in Adjusted Consolidated Operating Earnings

   50 $65,000,000    $25,000,000     >0  

Growth in Adjusted Domestic Operating Earnings

   30 $45,000,000    $15,000,000     >0  

Growth in Adjusted International Operating Earnings

   20 $18,000,000    $10,000,000     >0  
Performance Metric (1) (2)  Weight  Threshold  Target  Maximum

Adjusted Diluted EPS

  80%  $1.94  $2.15  $2.58

Average Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)

  20%  11.5%  12.8%  15.4%

(1) For achievement levels above the minimum amountthreshold but below target, or above target but below maximum, share payout amounts would be calculated based on a straight line interpolation of the achievement level above minimumthreshold or target, respectively. There is no payout for achievement below minimum.threshold.

(2) The metrics areaverage return on capital employed metric is measured over the 20142017 and 20152018 calendar years relative to 2013 actual performance,and the adjusted diluted EPS metric is measured for the calendar year 2018 and based on the applicable weights and achievement levels if met, will result in the issuance of restricted stock to each officer.

BecausePayouts on 2016 Performance Share Awards.    Based the Company’s failure to achieve thetwo-year performance metrics under the Performance Share Awards granted in 2016, the NEOs did not earn the performance metric for the performance shares awarded in 2014 has a two-year performance period, no restricted shares would be issued until after December 31, 2015 and only if one or more of the metrics are achieved at the minimum level or above. No restricted sharesshare awards that were issued in respect2016. These shares will not vest and will be forfeited.

Payouts on 2016 Performance Share Awards

Performance Metric   Weight   

 Target 

 100% 

  

Actual

 Achievement (1) 

  

Percentage

 Achievement 

Adjusted Diluted EPS

  80%  $2.12  $1.49  0%

Return on Invested Capital

  20%  10%  Less than 9%  0%

(1) For purposes of performance shares awardedthe 2016 Performance Share Awards, and in 2013 due to non-achievementaccordance with the terms of requisite operating earnings growth for 2013 and 2014. The Company was required to achieve growth in each of consolidated operating earnings and domestic operating earnings during 2013 and 2014 relative to consolidated operating earnings and domestic operating earnings for 2012 and a minimum ROIC for 2013 and 2014 of 0.7%; the Company did not achieve growth in either consolidated or domestic operating earnings overunderlying agreements approved by the 2013 and 2014 period and the ROICCompensation Committee, adjusted results for the period was (1.4)%.applicable performance metrics as provided in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Management Equity Ownership Program &Common Stock Ownership Guidelines.    In addition to the equity awards discussed above, in 2014, each NEO received an additional equity ownership dividend award of restricted stock or performance shares by achieving requisite stock ownership levels as of December 31, 2013 under the Company’s MEOP. Beginning with the 2014 calendar year, equity awards will no longer be made to officers under the MEOP for achieving or maintaining the requisiteWe have established Common Stock target ownership levels although the ownership levelsguidelines for our executive officers that are expected to be achieved and maintained will continue in effect. The MEOP is intendedmaintained. Under these guidelines, officers are given approximately five years to further strengthenreach the alignment of management and shareholder interests with the followingfull target ownership levels:amount with interim targets to meet each year. As of December 31, 2017, each continuing NEO had achieved his or her applicable target ownership level (Mr. Morris-Hipkins and Mr. Kordahi, who joined the Company in 2017 and 2016, respectively, have five years from the date of hire to meet the guidelines and currently are on track to do so). Because of the historical success of these guidelines in maintaining meaningful stock ownership levels among management, the Company has not imposed any further stock retention requirements on its executive officers in connection with stock option exercises or vesting of restricted stock.

The ownership guidelines are as follows:

 

                     Officer                    

  Value of Common Stock 

Chief Executive Officer

   6.0 x Base Salary 

President

   3.0 x Base Salary 

Executive Vice Presidents

   2.0 x Base Salary 

Senior Vice Presidents

   1.5 x Base Salary 

Vice Presidents, Regional Vice Presidents

   1.0 x Base Salary 

The Chief Executive Officer’s higher ownership target reflects the larger portion of his total compensation represented by long-term incentive award value. Eligible holdings in meeting these targets include direct holdings, indirect holdings, shares held through Company plans such as the 401(k) plan and teammate stock purchase plan, and restricted stock holdings (but excluding any stock options).

Under the MEOP, participants are given approximately five years to reach the full target ownership amount with interim targets to meet each year. As of December 31, 2014, each NEO had achieved his or her applicable target ownership amount. Because of the success of the MEOP in increasing and maintaining meaningful stock ownership levels among management, the Company has not imposed any further stock retention requirements on its executive officers in connection with stock option exercises or vesting of restricted stock.

Until discontinuation of the equity dividend beginning with calendar year 2014 and provided the applicable interim ownership targets were achieved, a 10% annual equity ownership dividend was paid on all Common Stock owned up to the participant’s full target ownership amount. The dividend was paid in the form of restricted stock that vests five years from the date of grant if the desired ownership level is maintained and the executive remains in the Company’s employ. Once a participant reached his or her total target level of ownership, the annual equity ownership dividend was reduced from 10% to 5% and was paid in performance shares rather than shares of service-based restricted stock.

Because the equity dividend feature of the MEOP has now been discontinued, the Compensation & Benefits Committee will consider the MEOP dividend amounts that previously would have been received as well as the continued expected stock ownership levels in establishing long-term incentive grant guidelines for the executive officers.

Proposed 20152018 Stock Incentive Plan

In connection with the expirationThe Board of the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan in 2015, the Compensation & Benefits CommitteeDirectors has approved, adopted and submitted for shareholder approval the proposed 20152018 Stock Incentive Plan which is more fully discussed under “Approval of the Proposed Owens & Minor, Inc. 20152018 Stock Incentive Plan” beginning on page 1618 of this proxy statement.

Retirement/Post-Termination Compensation

Retirement Compensation

The Company believes that retirement compensation is an essential component of an overall market competitive total executive compensation package in that it provides security for the future needs of the executives and their families. The NEOs are entitled to participate in the Company’s 401(k) plan and receive Company matching contributions in the same manner as other Company teammates.

The Company provides supplemental retirement benefits under a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) for certain officers selected by the Compensation & Benefits Committee, including certain of the NEOs,, as further described on page 5159 of this proxy statement under “Retirement Plans—Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.” At the time of its implementation in 1991, the SERP was designed to be competitive relative to defined benefit pension plans offered by other companies and to reward officers who provide long- termprovided long-term service to the Company, thereby promoting retention of highly performing executive talent. In 2012, the Compensation & Benefits Committee amended the SERP to freeze both benefit levels and participants effective March 31, 2012, as part of an effort to make our overall executive compensation program more performance- based.performance-based. Of the NEOs, Mr. Smith, Mr. Bierman, Ms. Davis, Mr. Colpo and Ms. den Hartog are participantsis the only remaining participant in the SERP.

Deferred Compensation Plan

The Company has an Executive Deferred Compensation and Retirement Plan into which officers and other management-level personnel may defer salary and cash bonus. The purpose of the deferred plan is to provide security for current and future needs of the participants and their families by providing a tax efficient opportunity to save for retirement and to ensure that our compensation program remains competitive in the marketplace for key management talent. This plan provides for the samesimilar investment options as are available under our 401(k) plan (other than the Company stock fund option).plan. For participants in this plan, the Company matches a total of up to 5% of 401(k) and deferred compensation plan contributions combined; provided that the participant has first maximized contributions under the 401(k) plan.

Change in Control Agreements

The Company has entered into change in control agreements (“CIC Agreements”) with certainits officers, including certaineach of the NEOs, as described on page 5662 of this proxy statement under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control—Change in Control Agreements.” The purpose of the CIC Agreements is to encourage key management personnel to remain with the Company and to help avoid distractions and conflicts of interest in the event of a potential or actual change in control of the Company so that executives will focus on a fair and impartial review of the acquisition proposal and the maximization of shareholder value despite the risk of losing their employment. The Compensation & Benefits Committee believes that the CIC Agreements help it to attract and retain key executive talent that could have other employment alternatives that may appear to be less risky absent these arrangements. The committeeCompensation Committee further believes that it has structured these agreements to be reasonable and to provide a temporary level of income protection to the executive in the event of employment loss due to a change in control.

The CIC Agreements do not provide for excise taxgross-up payments. In addition, the severance payment obligation under the CIC Agreements has a “double trigger” such that the payment of a severance benefit may only be made if there is a change of control and the officer’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without cause or by the officer for good reason within 24 months after such change in control. We believe that this structure strikes an appropriate balance between the incentives and the executive hiring and retention effects described above, without providing these benefits to executives who continue to enjoy employment with an acquiring company in the event of a change of control transaction. Annually in connection with the review of executive compensation tally sheets, the Compensation & Benefits Committee reviews the severance amounts that would be payable to each named executive officerNEO upon a change in control to ensure that the amounts are reasonable in light of the purpose of the agreements and relative to the marketplace generally. However, these amounts did not affect the committee’sCompensation Committee’s compensation decisions with regard to any specific element of our 20142017 executive compensation program.

Equity awards have the same “double-trigger” feature discussed above for accelerated vesting and exercisability, as applicable, in the event of a change in control. These same terms apply to the equity awards of all other teammates in the Company upon a change in control.

The CIC Agreements renew on ayear-to-year basis unless terminated by the Company with a notice ofnon-renewal.

Severance Policy

We have a formal severance policy described on page 5664 of this proxy statement under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control—Severance Policy” that applies to all corporate officers who are involuntarily terminated without cause (or who resign at the request of the Company). We adopted this policy to promote management stability and provide consistent and fair treatment to our departing officers in circumstances where their performance does not constitute cause for employment termination. We believe the severance policy helps the Company attract and retain key executive talent that could have other employment alternatives that may appear to be less risky absent such a policy. The severance policy is designed to provide the

officer with continued compensation and assistance for up to 18 months depending on years of service with the Company,following dismissal in an effort to assist him or her in finding new employment and is conditioned upon the officer entering into anon-competition,non-solicitation and confidentiality agreement for the benefit of the Company.

Other Benefits

In addition to the components of compensation discussed above, we provide certain other limited benefits to executives, including the NEOs, to help maximize the time key executives are able to spend on the Company’s business; to reward experience, expertise, responsibility, seniority, leadership qualities and advancement; and to ensure that our executive compensation program remains competitive in the marketplace for key executive talent. These other benefits consist of the following and are specifically disclosed by amount in note 4 to the Summary Compensation Table on page 4654 of this proxy statement: funding of life insurance policy premiums (provides security for current and future needs of the executives and their families), automobile allowance or lease (ensures transportation for business travel needs, recognizing that the automobile may also be used for personal purposes), tax and financial planning and tax return preparation assistance (allows executives to concentrate on business matters rather than on personal financial planning), and annual physical and enhanced medical access (identifies and addresses medical issues and helps preserve the Company’s investment in its executives by encouraging them to maintain healthy lifestyles and be proactive in addressing potential health issues). In addition, NEOs may participate in our health and welfare plans, 401(k) plan and teammate stock purchase plan on the same basis as other full-time teammates. Finally, except under limited and unusual circumstances, we only pay for executive travel on commercial or private aircraft when such travel is integrally and directly related to the performance of the executive’s duties for the Company and is not personal in nature. We do not provide taxgross-ups on any income executives may realize as a result of the foregoing benefits.

Recoupment Policy

In an effort to mitigate any imprudent risk-taking behavior associated with incentive compensation, the Company has a policy that permits the recoupment of performance-based cash and equity compensation paid to executive officers. This compensation is recoverable from an executive officer if:

 

 (i)The payment or award was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements;

 

 (ii)The Board (or its designated Compensation & Benefits Committee) determines that the executive engaged in misconduct that caused or substantially caused the need for the restatement; and

 

 (iii)A lower payment would have been made to the executive officer based upon the restated financial results.

If the foregoing conditions are met, as determined by the Board (or its designated committee), the Company, under terms of the applicable program or award agreements, will recover from the executive officer the amount by which his or her performance-based compensation for the relevant period exceeded the amount (if any) that would have been paid based on the restated financial results. The Board (or its designated committee) may take such further action as it deems necessary or appropriate to remedy the misconduct and prevent its recurrence. The recoupment policy currently will not apply to performance-based compensation after the second anniversary of the date on which such compensation was paid. We continue to monitor additional requirements that may be imposed pursuant to Section 304 under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and that would lead to modification of this policy to the extent required by the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 and the related final rules of the SEC.

Hedging and Derivatives Trading Prohibition

The Company has policies that prohibit directors, officers and other teammates with access to confidential information of the Company from engaging in certain transactions relating to our common stock, including buying or selling options and short sales. We also prohibit these individuals from hedging the economic risk of ownership of our common stock and strongly discourage holding our stock in a margin account or pledging our stock as collateral for a loan.

Tax Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code disallows corporategenerally precludes a tax deductionsdeduction by any publicly-held company for executive compensation in excess ofpaid to any “covered employee” to the extent the compensation paid to such covered employee exceeds $1 million during any taxable year of the company. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was enacted in the United States in December 2017 and included changes to Section 162(m) effective for years beginning in and after 2018. Prior to 2018, “covered employees” included the Chief Executive Officer of the company and the three other highest paid annually toofficers of the NEOs othercompany (other than the Chief Financial Officer. This law allowsOfficer). For 2018 and later years, “covered employees” will include the Chief Executive Officer of the company, the Chief Financial Officer of the company, the three highest paid officers of the company (other than the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer) and any employee who qualified as a “covered person” for certain exemptionsany tax year beginning after 2016. For years beginning prior to January 1, 2018, the $1 million deduction cap, including “performance-basedlimit did not apply to “qualified performance-based compensation” as definedthat is based on the attainment ofpre-established, objective performance goals established under a stockholder-approved plan. Effective for the years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, there is no exception for “qualified performance-based compensation” from the Section 162(m) limitation; but, a transition rule provides that the “qualified performance-based compensation” exemption will continue to apply to awards that are made pursuant to a binding contract in the rules adoptedeffect on or before November 2, 2017, that is not materially modified thereafter. A number of requirements must be met under Section 162(m).

Although in order for particular compensation to so qualify for the Company prefersexception such that its pay plansthere can be “performance-based”no assurance that “qualified performance-based” compensation will be fully deductible under all circumstances. We believe that it is important to preserve flexibility in administering compensation programs to promote various corporate goals. Accordingly, we have not adopted a policy that all compensation must qualify as deductible under Section 162(m). Amounts paid under our compensation programs may not be deductible as the result of Section 162(m). While our policy is generally to preserve corporate tax deductions by qualifying compensation over $1 million paid to executive officers as performance-based, the Compensation Committee may, from time to time, conclude that compensation arrangements are in our best interests and therefore eligiblethe best interests of our shareholders despite the fact that such arrangements might not, in whole or part, qualify for tax deductibility. We intend to design our executive compensation expense deductions, it also believes that, under certain circumstances, awarding compensation that is not tax deductible may better support the long-term goals of the Companyarrangements to be consistent with our best interests and the interests of our shareholders. In 2014, eachTo the extent we determine it to be consistent with our best interests and the interests of Mr. Smith and Mr. Bierman had compensation that was nondeductible because it exceeded the $1 million allowance under Section 162(m).

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

Our compensation policies are applied in the same mannerour shareholders, we intend to all executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer. The 2014 total direct compensation for each of Mr. Smith and Mr. Bierman, each of whom served in the Chief Executive Officer position in 2014, was higher than that of certain other NEOs to reflect the significant differences in the relative responsibilities and authority of those in the Chief Executive Officer position relativepreserve, to the other officers. We believe thatextent practicable, the scopeapplicability of the Chief Executive Officer’s responsibilities and authority, together with his abilitytransition rule to impact the Company’s performance,awards that were granted on or before October 2, 2017. However, there is significantly greater thanno guaranty that of the other NEOs and, accordingly, is reflected in his compensation. The differential in each of Mr. Smith’s and Mr. Bierman’s compensation relative to certain other executive officers also is consistent with the compensation structures of the Peer Companies and thus reflects market differentials for the chief executive officer position versus other executives.such transition status can or will be applicable.

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION & BENEFITS COMMITTEE

The Compensation & Benefits Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement. Based on this review and discussion, the committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.

THE COMPENSATION & BENEFITS COMMITTEE

Robert C. Sledd, Chairman

Stuart M. EssigBarbara B. Hill

Martha H. Marsh

James E. Rogers

David S. Simmons

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table summarizes for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, as applicable, the total compensation of our NEOs—two individuals who served asour Chief Executive Officer, during 2014, our Chief Financial Officer, and our three other most highly compensated executive officers and one additional former officer.officers.

 

(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j) 

Name and Principal

Position

 Year  Salary ($)  

Bonus

($)

  

Stock
Awards

(1)

($)

  

Option
Awards
(1)

($)

  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation (2)
($)
  

Change in
Pension
Value and

Value andNon-Qualified

Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings (3)
($)

  

All Other
Compensation
(4)

($)

  

Total

($)

 

Craig R. SmithP. Cody Phipps (5)

Executive Chairman,

(former President & Chief Executive

Officer) Officer

  

20142017

20132016

20122015

 

 

 

 $

 

895,888922,500

898,941915,577

878,391443,117

 

 

 

 $

 

75,000—  

0—  

01,125,000

 

 

 

 $

 

1,004,2105,000,001

986,1613,999,994

1,084,1207,000,022

 

 

 

 $

 

0—  

0—  

0—  

 

 

 

 $

 

0383,991

01,083,939

0217,125



—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 $

 

1,812,044375,543

0263,869

1,024,137107,292

 

 

 

 $

 

99,0806,682,035

79,6186,263,379

46,391


$

3,886,222

1,964,720

3,033,039


James L. Bierman (6)

President & Chief

Executive Officer


2014

2013

2012


$

781,157

645,192

591,267


$

99,167

0

0


$

1,594,785

843,055

567,167


$

0

0

0


$

0

0

0


$

903,140

0

516,615


$

38,229

44,750

27,549


$

3,416,478

1,532,997

1,702,5988,892,556

 

 

 

                                      

Richard A. Meier (7)(6)

Executive Vice

President, CFO & Chief

Financial OfficerPresident, International

  

20142017

20132016

20122015

 

 

 

 $

 

605,157653,162

473,269648,260

—  614,765

 

 

 

 $

 

58,650

0

—  


$

490,401

1,099,975

—  


$

0

0


$

0

0


$

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 $

 

27,0051,050,044

560,252699,999

1,632,526


$

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 $

 

1,181,213163,127

2,133,496460,480

471,154



—  

—  

—  


$

299,116

155,869

182,896


$

2,165,449

1,964,608

2,901,341

 

 

 

                                      

Erika T. DavisStuart Morris-Hipkins

SeniorExecutive Vice President,

Administration & Operations Global Manufacturer Services

  

20142017

20132016

20122015

 

 

 

 $

 

520,972335,096

441,331—  

397,587—  

 

 

 

 $

 

50,490100,000

0—  

0—  

 

 

 

 $

 

358,0311,335,037

490,158—  

370,808—  

 

 

 

 $

 

0—  

0—  

0—  

 

 

 

 $

 

091,730

0—  

0—  



—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 $

 

612,81867,331

0—  

330,614—  

 

 

 

 $

 

27,2081,926,194

34,866—  

30,134


$

1,569,519

966,355

1,129,143—  

 

 

 

                                      

Charles C. Colpo

Senior Vice President,

Strategic RelationshipsSupplier Management

  

20142017

20132016

20122015

 

 

 

 $

 

448,734456,895

426,432453,466

444,390471,739

 

 

 

 $

 

43,488—  

0—  

0—  

 

 

 

 $

 

247,452467,979

234,136311,994

271,189390,002

 

 

 

 $

 

0—  

0—  

0—  

 

 

 

 $

 

076,073

0214,742

0265,892

 

 

 

 $

 

681,124—  

0225,265

405,819—  

 

 

 

 $

 

185,331829,467

31,268535,319

27,151623,499

 

 

 

 $

 

1,606,1291,830,414

691,8361,740,786

1,148,5491,751,132

 

 

 

                                      

Grace R. den HartogRony C. Kordahi

SeniorExecutive Vice President,

General Counsel &

Corporate Secretary North American Operations

  

20142017

20132016

20122015

 

 

 

 $

 

452,562450,000

414,418328,846

403,545—  

 

 

 $

 

44,500

0

0


$

358,971

355,994

371,655


$

0

0

0


$

0

0

0


$

698,306

0

375,999


$

19,391

21,976

15,145


$

1,573,730

792,388

1,166,344


Brian J. Shotto (8)

Former Senior Vice

President, Manufacturer

Services


2014

2013

2012


$

352,212

473,921

—  


$

0

0

—  


$

371,866

474,302

—  


$

0

0


$

0

0


$

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 $

 

851,6641,050,044

34,2761,099,993

—  

 

 

 

 $

 

1,575,742—  

982,499—  

—  

 

 

$

104,895

222,076

—  



—  

—  

—  


$

52,334

71,592

—  


$

1,657,273

1,722,507

—  


 

(1) The amounts included in column (e) are the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, and column (e) includes awards subject to performance conditions. Of the total awards reflected in column (e) for 2014,2017, the amount specified below for each officer represents awards subject to performance conditions, which are valued at the grant date based on probable achievement at target levels:

Mr. Smith, $604,205; Mr. Bierman, $705,014;Phipps, $2,999,993; Mr. Meier, $200,002; Ms. Davis, $195,537;$700,030; Mr. Morris-Hipkins, $700,017; Mr. Colpo, $142,447; Ms. den Hartog, $196,477;$311,986; Mr. Shotto, $162,494.Kordahi, $700,030.

The grant date value of the above performance-based awards for 20142017 would equal the following for each officer assuming achievement of the highest level of performance conditions:

Mr. Smith, $1,208,410; Mr. Bierman, $1,410,028;Phipps, $5,999,986; Mr. Meier, $400,004; Ms. Davis, $391,074;$1,400,060; Mr. Morris-Hipkins, $1,400,034; Mr. Colpo, $284,894; Ms. den Hartog, $392,954;$623,988; Mr. Shotto, $324,988.Kordahi, $1,400,060.

For Mr. Phipps, the 2015 amount includes aone-time “sign on” grant of $5,000,006 of restricted stock. For Mr. Meier, the 2015 amount includes a “special” grant of $1,000,009 of restricted stock. For Mr. Kordahi, the 2016 amount includes a“sign-on” grant of $400,011 of restricted stock. For Mr. Morris-Hipkins, the 2017 amount includes a“sign-on” grant of $285,004 of restricted stock.

Assumptions used in the calculation of the stock awards included in column (e) are included in note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, which is incorporated herein by reference. The actual value an NEO may receive for stock awards depends on market prices, and there can be no assurance that the amounts shown are the amounts that will be realized. Mr. Shotto forfeited all of his performance-based share awards upon his resignation from the Company effective August 31, 2014.

(2) The amounts included in column (g) reflect cash awards to the NEOs under the Company’s performance-based annual incentive programs for 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012. No2015. Mr. Morris-Hipkins’ 2017 cash award ispro-rated based on time in position during 2017 (10 months). Further information on awards were made under the 20142017 Annual Incentive Program as discussedis provided under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Annual Incentives” on page 3643 of this proxy statement.

(3) The amounts included in column (h) reflect the actuarial increase in the present value of the NEO’s benefits under the Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) during 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’s financial statements. SERP benefits were frozen effective March 31, 2012, and Mr.none of Messrs. Phipps, Meier, does notMorris-Hipkins and Kordahi participate in the SERP. For additional information on the Company’s retirement plans, see “Retirement Plans” on page 5159 of this proxy statement. No NEO received preferential or above-market earnings on deferred compensation.

(4) For 2014,2017, the amounts included in column (i) consist of the following benefits or Company contributions attributable to the following:

 

    Car Lease
or
Allowance
   Tax
Planning/
Return
Preparation
   Life
Insurance
Premiums
   

Deferred
Compensation
Plan and 401(k)
Plan

Company

Match

   Annual
Physical/
Medical
Access
   

Other

(a)

   Total 

Mr. Smith (b)

  $14,317    $3,984    $30,875    $37,184    $950    $11,770    $99,080  

Mr. Bierman

   9,600     7,000     0     19,249     950     1,430     38,229  

Mr. Meier (c)

   9,600     0     0     10,715     950     5,740     27,005  

Ms. Davis

   8,917     3,500     0     13,442     950     399     27,208  

Mr. Colpo (d)

   27,579     0     4,251     14,177     950     138,374     185,331  

Ms. den Hartog

   8,052     0     0     10,389     950     0     19,391  

Mr. Shotto (e)

   6,400     0     0     25,660     950     818,654     851,664  
   Car Lease
or
Allowance
  Tax
Planning/
Return
Preparation
  

Dividends on
Restricted Stock

Awards (a)

  Life
Insurance
Premiums
  

Deferred
Compensation
Plan and 401(k)
Plan

Company

Match

  Annual
Physical/
Medical
Access
  

Other

(f)

  Total 

P. Cody Phipps

 $15,250  $8,945  $334,643  $1,355 $13,250  $2,100  $0  $375,543 

Richard A. Meier (b)

  9,600   —     86,309   1,355  56,180   1,050   144,622   299,116 

Stuart Morris-Hipkins (c)(e)

  6,890   —     18,270   394  1,962   1,050   38,765   67,331 

Charles C. Colpo (d)

  32,131   500   35,196   6,031   13,250   1,050   741,309   829,467 

Rony C. Kordahi

  9,600   0   27,790   644  13,250   1,050   0   52,334 

 

 (a)Amounts included in this column represent dividends paid on Restricted Stock Awards, accumulated dividend equivalents paid on earned Performance Shares and/or dividend equivalents paid on Restricted Stock Units. Amounts for 2015 and 2014 were: Mr. Phipps—$224,528 for 2016 and $89,118 for 2015; Mr. Meier—$78,291 for 2016 and $65,023 for 2015; Mr. Colpo—$25,643 for 2016 and $10,862 for 2015; Mr. Kordahi—$12,566 for 2016.

(b)Mr. Meier’s other compensation represents relocation costs paid by the Company in 2017.

(c)Mr. Morris-Hipkins’s other compensation represents relocation costs paid by the Company in 2017.

(d)Included in Mr. Colpo’s other compensation are the following amounts paid or attributed to him in connection with his temporary relocation to the United Kingdom to manage our European operations: $540,864 in tax equalization payments, $97,036 ingross-up payments, $79,451 in housing allowance and related costs, and $21,905 in cost of living allowance.

(e)Mr. Morris-Hipkins joined the Company as Executive Vice President, Global Manufacturer Services, on March 13, 2017.

(f)Unless otherwise provided with respect to an NEO, includes miscellaneous amenities and/or awards provided at Company sales and leadership conferences and other awards or gifts.

(b)Mr. Smith’s other compensation includes $8,278 attributable to his personal use of Company-leased aircraft on one occasion during 2014. This amount represents the actual incremental cost incurred by the Company for the personal flight inclusive of fuel, trip-related maintenance and fees and pilot expenses.

(c)Mr. Meier’s other compensation represents relocation compensation paid in 2014.

(d)

Included in Mr. Colpo’s other compensation are the following amounts paid or attributed to him in connection with his temporary relocation to the United Kingdom to assist in managing our international

logistics operations: $98,479 in local taxes paid on Mr. Colpo’s behalf, $22,489 in relocation expenses, $13,669 in an additional cost-of-living allowance, and $3,737 in relocation allowance.

(e)Mr. Shotto’s other compensation represents accrued vacation of $57,115 and a lump sum severance payment of $761,539 related to his resignation at the request of the Company. His lump sum severance payment was based on a negotiated 18-month severance period. For additional information on the Company’s officer severance policy, see “Severance Policy” on page 56 of this proxy statement.

(5) Mr. Smith servedPhipps joined the Company as Chairmanits President & Chief Executive officer until Septembereffective July 1, 2014, at which time he was named Executive Chairman.2015.

(6) Mr. Bierman was namedMeier assumed the additional role of President, & Chief Executive OfficerInternational effective SeptemberJuly 1, 2014. He served as President & Chief Operating Officer prior to2015.

(7) The amounts included in column (d) reflect special or guaranteed bonus payments. As part of his promotion.

(7)offer of employment, Mr.  Meier joined the Company as Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer effective March 1, 2013.Morris-Hipkins received a“sign-on” cash bonus of $100,000.

(8) Mr. Shotto served as Senior Vice President, Manufacturer Services until his resignation from the Company effective August 31, 2014.

GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS TABLE

The following table shows awards granted to the named executive officersNEOs during the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.

 

(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j) (k) (l) 
Name Grant
Date
  

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards

(1)

  

Estimated Potential Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards

(2)

  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or
Units (3)
(#)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (4)
(#)
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($ /Sh)
 Grant
Date
Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards
(5)
 
  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
     

Craig R. Smith

  2/6/14                1    11,912    23,824         $400,005  
   2/6/14                            11,912      400,005  
   2/6/14                1    6,081    12,162          204,200  
   N/A   $146,648   $586,593   $1,173,186                        
                                         

James L. Bierman

  2/6/14                            7,445     $250,003  
   2/6/14                            5,502      184,757  
   2/6/14                1    7,445    14,890          250,003  
   9/2/14                1    13,285    26,570          455,011  
   9/2/14                            13,285     455,011  
   N/A   $112,625   $450,500   $901,000                        
                                         

Richard A. Meier

  2/6/14                1   5,956    11,912         $200,002  
   2/6/14                            5,956      200,002  
   2/6/14                            2,692      90,397  
   N/A   $73,313   $293,250   $586,500                        
                                         

Erica T. Davis

  2/6/14                1    4,839    9,678         $162,494  
   2/6/14                            4,839      162,494  
   2/6/14                1    984    1,968          33,043  
   N/A   $63,113   $252,450   $504,900                        
                                         

Charles C. Colpo

  2/6/14                1   3,127    6,254         $105,005  
   2/6/14                            3,127      105,005  
   2/6/14                1    1,115    2,230          37,442  
   N/A   $54,360   $217,440   $434,880                        
                                         

Grace den Hartog

  2/6/14                1    4,839    9,678         $162,494  
   2/6/14                            4,839      162,494  
   2/6/14                1    1,012    2,024          33,983  
   N/A   $55,625   $222,500   $445,000                        
                                         

Brian J. Shotto

  2/6/14                1    4,839    9,678         $162,494  
   2/6/14                            4,839      162,494  
   2/6/14                            1,396     46,878  
   N/A   $41,250   $165,000   $330,000                        
                                         
(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j)  (k)  (l) 
Name Grant
Date
  

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards

(1)

  

Estimated Potential Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards

(2)

  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or
Units (3)
(#)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (4)
(#)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($ /Sh)
  Grant
Date
Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards
(5)
 
   
Threshold
($)

 
  
Target
($)

 
  
Maximum
($)

 
  
Threshold
(#)

 
  
Target
(#)

 
  
Maximum
(#)

 
    

P. Cody Phipps

  2/9/17              1   55,695   111,390           $2,000,007 
   2/9/17                     55,695         2,000,007 
   2/9/17               27,847   55,694            999,986 
   N/A  $403,594  $864,844  $2,306,250                      
                                             

Richard A. Meier

  2/9/17              1   9,747   19,494           $350,015 
   2/9/17               9,747   19,494            350,015 
   2/9/17                     9,747         350,015 
   N/A   $171,455   $367,404   $979,743                      
                                             

Stuart Morris-Hipkins

  3/13/17              1         9,777        $350,017 
   3/13/17                     7,961         285,004 
   3/13/17               9,777   19,554            350,017 
   5/5/17               10,674   21,348            350,000 
   N/A   $104,125   $223,125   $595,000                      
                                             

Charles C. Colpo

  2/9/17              1         4,344        $155,993 
   2/9/17               4,344   8,688            155,993 
   2/9/17               4,344   8,688            155,993 
   N/A   $79,957   $171,336   $456,895                      
                                             

Rony C. Kordahi

  2/9/17                     9,747        $350,015 
   2/9/17              1   9,747   19,494            350,015 
   2/9/17               9,747   19,494            350,015 
   N/A   $110,250   $236,250   $630,000                      
                                             

(1) The amounts shown in column (c) reflect the minimum payment level under the Company’s 20142017 Annual Incentive Program if minimum performance conditions were met and represents 25%47% of the target payment level shown in column (d) which is based on meeting target performance conditions. The amount shown in column (e) is 200% of the target payment level and is based on meeting maximum performance conditions. These amounts are based upon the individual’s 20142017 salary and position (75%(125% of base salary for the Chief Executive Officer andMr. Phipps,

75% of base salary for Mr. Meier, 70% of base salary for Mr. Stuart Morris-Hipkins, 50% of base salary for the other named executive officers)Mr. Colpo, and 70% of base salary for Mr. Kordahi). There were no payoutsPayouts under the 20142017 Annual Incentive Program as reflectedare set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table—Table” underNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”Compensation” on page 54 of this proxy statement.

(2) The amounts shown in column (f) reflect the minimum restricted stock award level under 20142017 performance share grants if minimum performance conditions are met and represents the minimum level of growth in operating earnings.met. The target restricted stock award level shown in column (g) is based on meeting target performance conditions and the maximum level shown in column (h) is 200% of the target restricted stock award level and is based on meeting the maximum performance conditions. These restricted stock awards are based on the Company’s achievement of growth in operating earningsaverage return on capital employed and adjusted diluted EPS goals for 20142017 and 20152018 as discussed on page 4048 of this proxy statement and, if earned, vest on the third anniversary of the performance share grant. Dividends are not paid on performance share grants unless and until the performance conditions are satisfied, resulting in the issuance of the underlying restricted stock.

(3) The amounts shown in column (i) represent grants of restricted stock that vest either three orone to five years from the date of grant based on the executive’s continued employment with the Company. Dividends are paid on outstanding restricted stock grants at the same rate as for all shareholders of record.

(4) No stock options were granted by the Company in 2014.2017.

(5) The amounts shown in column (l) are the grant date fair value of each individual equity award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END TABLE

The following table summarizes for each NEO information regarding unexercised stock options, unvested restricted stock awards and incentive plan awards outstanding as of December 31, 2014.2017.

 

 Option Awards  Stock Awards  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j)  (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j) 
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)

  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

(#) (1)

  

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested

($) (2)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units

or Other

Rights
That
Have Not
Vested

(#) (3)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested

($) (3)

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)

  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

(#) (1)

  

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested

($) (2)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units

or Other

Rights
That
Have Not
Vested

(#) (3)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested

($) (3)

 
Name Exercisable  Unexercisable   Exercisable  Unexercisable  

Craig R. Smith

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

  

  

  

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

 

  

  

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

  

  

  

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

  

  

  

  

 

 

11,912

13,068

14,867

  

  

  

 $

 

 

418,230

458,817

521,980

  

  

  

  

 

 

11,912

6,081

—  

  

 

 

  

 

 

418,230

213,504

—  

 

 

 

Total

  —      —      —     —     —     39,847    1,399,028    17,993   631,734  

James L. Bierman

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

 

  

  

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

 

  

  

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

 

  

  

  

 

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,285

7,445

5,502

5,988

8,167

4,183

7,847

1,678

2,734

2,565

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 $

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

466,436

261,394

193,175

210,239

286,743

146,865

275,508

58,915

95,991

90,057

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,445

13,285

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

261,394

466,436

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

P. Cody Phipps

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

  

55,695

31,765

58,360

88,236

29,412

 

 

 

 

 

 $

 

1,051,522

599,723

1,101,837

1,665,896

555,299

 

 

 

 

 

  

27,847

55,695

58,360

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 $

 

525,751

1,051,522

1,101,837

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

Total

  —      —     —     —     —     59,394    2,085,323    20,730   727,830   —     —     —     —     —     263,468   4,974,276   141,902   2,679,110 

Richard A. Meier

  

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

  

  

  

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

5,956

2,692

16,420

9,852

  

  

  

  

 $

 

 

 

209,115

94,516

576,506

345,904

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

5,956

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

209,115

—  

—  

—  

  

  

  

  

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

9,747

11,455

10,213

7,071

2,692

16,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $

 

184,023

216,270

192,821

133,500

50,825

310,010

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

9,747

9,747

10,213

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 $

 

184,023

184,023

192,821

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

  —     —      —     —     —     34,920    1,226,041    5,956    209,115    —     —     —     —     —     57,598   1,087,450   29,707   560,868 

Erika T. Davis

  

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

4,839

3,760

5,309

5,633

  

  

  

  

 $

 

 

 

169,897

132,014

186,399

197,795

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

4,839

984

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

169,897

34,548

—  

—  

 

  

 

 

Stuart Morris-Hipkins

  

—  

—  

 

 

  

—  

—  

 

 

  

—  

—  

 

 

  

—  

—  

 

 

  

—  

—  

 

 

  

9,777

7,961

 

 

 $

 

150,304

184,590

 

 

  

10,674

9,777

 

 

 $

 

201,525

184,590

 

 

Total

  —      —      —     —     —     19,541    686,085    5,823   204,446   —     —     —     —     —     17,738   334,893   20,451   386,115 

Charles C. Colpo

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

  

 

 

3,127

3,267

3,717

  

  

  

 $

 

 

109,789

114,704

130,504

  

  

  

  

 

 

3,127

1,115

—  

 

 

 

  

 

 

109,789

39,148

—  

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

  

4,344

7,063

4,360

—  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

82,015

133,349

85,942

82,317

 

 

 

 

  

4,344

4,344

4,552

—  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

82,015

82,015

85,942

—  

 

 

 

 

Total

  —     —      —     —     —     10,111    354,997    4,242    148,937    —     —     —     —     —     20,319   383,623   13,240   249,971 

Grace R. den Hartog

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

  

 

 

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

  

 

 

4,839

5,309

5,633

  

  

  

 $

 

 

169,897

186,399

197,775

  

  

  

  

 

 

4,839

1,012

—  

 

 

 

  

 

 

169,897

35,531

—  

 

 

 

Rony C. Kordahi

  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

9,747

9,926

6,474

 

 

 

 $

 

184,023

187,403

122,229

 

 

 

  

9,747

9,747

9,926

 

 

 

 $

 

184,023

184,023

187,403

 

 

 

Total

  —     —      —     —     —     15,781    554,071    5,851    205,429    —     —     —     —     —     26,147   493,655   29,420   555,450 

Brian J. Shotto (4)

  

 

 

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

3,773

1,211

2,876

2,340

310

593

  

  

  

  

  

  

 $

 

 

 

 

 

132,470

42,518

100,976

82,157

10,884

20,820

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

  

 

 

  

  

 

Total

  —     —      —     —     —     11,103    389,826    —      —    

(1) Shares of restricted stock vest fully either three or five years from the date of grant. Vesting dates for the shares of restricted stock listed for each officer range from January 20142018 to August 2019.July 2020.

(2) The market value of the restricted shares was calculated based on $35.11$18.88 per share, the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 2014.2017. Dividends are paid on outstanding shares of restricted stock at the same rate as paid to all shareholders of record.

(3) The amounts in column (i) represent the number of performance shares outstanding based on the achievement of the thresholdtarget level of performance conditions. The market value of the performance shares was

calculated based on $35.11$18.88 per share, the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 2014.2017. Dividends are not paid on performance shares unless and until the underlying performance conditions are achieved.

(4) Mr. Shotto forfeited all of his performance shares upon his resignation from the Company effective August 31, 2014.

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE

The following table sets forth for each NEO information on stock option exercises and vesting of restricted stock on an aggregated basis during the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.

 

(a)

  Option Awards   Stock Awards   Option Awards   Stock Awards 
(a)(b)   (c)   (d)   (e)  (a)  (b)   (c)   (d)   (e) 
Name  

Number of Shares

Acquired on Exercise

(#)

   

Value Realized

on Exercise

($) (1)

   

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting

(#)

   

Value Realized

on Vesting

($) (2)

   

Number of Shares

Acquired on Exercise

(#)

   

Value Realized

on Exercise

($)

   

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting

(#)

   

Value Realized

on Vesting

($) (1)

 

Craig R. Smith

   0    $0    20,991    $722,324 

James L. Bierman

   0    $0    10,305    $354,714  

P. Cody Phipps

   —      —      29,412   $946,772 

Richard A. Meier

   0    $0     0    $0     —      —      26,183    881,093 

Erika T. Davis

   0    $0    6,360    $219,533  

Stuart Morris-Hipkins

   —      —      —      —   

Charles C. Colpo

   0    $0     8,151    $281,146     —      —      6,902    248,472 

Grace R. den Hartog

   7,750    $82,781     6,388    $220,481  

Brian J. Shotto

   0    $0     8,797    $286,430  

Rony C. Kordahi

   —      —      3,335    114,491 

(1) The value realized on exercise is computed as the difference between the market price of the underlying securities at exercise and the exercise price of the options.

(2) The value realized on vesting is computed by multiplying the number of shares vesting by the market price of the underlying shares on the vesting date.

RETIREMENT PLANS

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.Plan

The Company provides supplemental retirement benefits to certain officers, including Mr. Smith, Mr. Bierman, Mr. Colpo, Ms. Davis and Ms. den Hartog, under the SERP. Effective March 31, 2012, the Board of Directors amended the SERP to freeze benefit levels under the plan.plan and participation by future executives. The SERP entitles participants who meet its age and service requirements to receive a specified percentage (in the case of Mr. Smith, 65%, and the other participating NEOs, 60%(60%) of the participant’s average base monthly salary plus bonus for the highest consecutive five out of the last ten10 years preceding March 31, 2012. The SERP benefit to which a participant is entitled is reduced by any benefit payable under Social Security, defined benefit pension plans and the benefit attributable to certain Company contributions under the Company’s 401(k) plan. The SERP provides for full benefits to participants who retire at or after the attainment of the age of 65 (or at or after the age of 62 with 20 years of service) and provides for reduced benefits to participants who retire between the ages of 55 and 64 if their age plus years of service to the Company equal at least 70. If a participant retires prior to age 65 (or prior to age 62 with 20 years of service), his or her otherwise applicable full retirement benefit is reduced by 0.333% for each month remaining from the date of retirement until the participant would reach age 65. SERP payments are made to an eligible participant until his or her death (and, following the participant’s death, will continue to be made to the participant’s beneficiary unless or until a total of 180 payments have been made under the SERP to either the participant or his or her beneficiary). Upon retirement, participants are no longer eligible to participate in the Company’s medical insurance or benefit plans (except as legally required under COBRA). In consideration for receiving benefits under the SERP, the participant must comply with anon-competition agreement during employment and for a period of five years following employment by the Company.

PENSION BENEFITS TABLEPension Benefits Table

The following table shows the actuarial present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of the NEOs as of December 31, 2014,2017, including the number of years of service credited to each such NEO, under the SERP using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’s financial statements. Benefits under the SERP are payable as a monthly annuity.

 

(a)  (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)
Name  Plan Name    Number of Years  
Credited Service  
(#)  
  

Present Value  
of Accumulated  
Benefit  

($) (1)(2)  

  

Payments During Last

Fiscal Year

($)

Craig R. Smith

  SERP  26  $11,109,578  $0  

James L. Bierman

  SERP    8  5,373,288  0

Richard A. Meier

  SERP  —    —    —  

Erika T. Davis

  SERP  22  2,401,227  0

Charles C. Colpo

  SERP  33  3,505,583  0

Grace R. den Hartog

  SERP  12  4,005,162  0

Brian J. Shotto

  SERP  —    —    —  
(a)  (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)
Name  Plan Name    Number of Years  
Credited Service  
(#)  
  

Present Value  
of Accumulated  
Benefit  

($) (1)  

  

Payments During Last

Fiscal Year

($)

P. Cody Phipps

  N/A  —    —    —  

Richard A. Meier

  N/A  —    —    —  

Stuart Morris-Hipkins

  N/A  —    —    —  

Charles C. Colpo

  SERP  36  $4,134,577  —  

Rony C. Kordahi

  N/A  —    —    —  

(1) Mr. Smith, Mr. Bierman, Mr. Colpo Ms. Davis and Ms. den Hartog areis the NEOsonly NEO who participateparticipates in the SERP. Annual benefitsThe annual benefit payable under the SERP upon retirement at normal retirement age for the participating NEOs are: Mr. Smith, $792,614; Mr. Bierman, $399,319; Mr. Colpo $316,661: Ms. Davis, $253,312; and Ms. den Hartog, $271,339.is $316,656. The calculation of present value of accumulated benefit assumes a discount rate of 3.75%3.25% and was based on theRP-2014 Mortality Table.Table,MP-2017 Projection Scale. For a discussion of the assumptions used by the Company in calculating these amounts, see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, which is incorporated herein by reference.

(2) The following four NEOs are eligible for early retirement under the SERP, qualifying for the indicated percentages of their full retirement benefits: Mr. Smith, 100%, Mr. Bierman, 92%, Mr. Colpo, 68% and Ms. den Hartog, 92%. Ms. Davis does not qualify for early retirement benefits under the SERP.

Following retirement, stock options and restricted stock awards continue to vest pursuant to the terms of the respective grants if, at the discretion of the Company, the officer continues to serve the Company as a director, in a consulting capacity or by entering into anon-solicitation and confidentiality agreement for the benefit of the Company. An officer is eligible following retirement to receive a portion of any performance shares earned based on achievement of the performance conditionspro-rated for the number of months worked during the performance period. Performance shares were valued based upon assumed performance at the target level. Assuming continued service to the Company, each of the NEOs would receive the following estimated benefit due to continued vesting of equity awards if he or she had been eligible to and actually retired on December 31, 2014:2017: Mr. Smith, $2,040,015; Mr. Bierman, $2,356,095;Phipps, $6,205,265; Mr. Meier, $1,505,248; Ms. Davis, $895,708;$1,333,548; Mr. Morris-Hipkins, $452,699; Mr. Colpo, $503,097; Ms. den Hartog, $764,651;$493,306; and Mr. Shotto, $0.Kordahi, $736,238. This benefit is calculated based upon the number of shares subject to continued vesting multiplied by $35.11,$18.88, the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 2014.29, 2017. Performance shares were valued based upon assumed performance at the target level.

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANNonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

The Company maintains an Executive Deferred Compensation and Retirement Plan in which members of senior management and other management-level teammates are eligible to participate. This plan permits participants to defer base salary (up to 75%) and cash bonus (up to 100%) paid during a year for which a deferral election is made. This plan provides for the samesimilar investment options other than the Company stock fund, as are available to participants under our 401(k) plan. The Company matches a total of up to 5% of combined 401(k) plan and deferred compensation plan contributions, provided that the participant has first maximized permitted contributions under the 401(k) plan. The following table sets forth information regarding contributions to, earnings on and total balances in the Executive Deferred Compensation plan for the NEOs in 2014.2017.

 

(a)  (b)   (c)   (d)   (e)  (f) 

Name

   
 
 
 

 

Executive
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year

($) (1)

 
  
 
  

  

   
 
 

 

 

Registrant
Contributions
in Last

Fiscal Year

($) (2)

  
 
  

  

  

   
 
 

 
 
 

 

Aggregate
Earnings
(Losses)

in Last
Fiscal
Year

($) (3)

 
  
  

 
 
  

  

  Aggregate
Withdrawals  /
Distributions

($)

   
 
 

 

 

 

Aggregate
Balance
at

Last Fiscal

Year-End

($)

 
 
  

  

  

  

Craig R. Smith

  $44,791    $23,208    $3,797    —    $107,437  

James L. Bierman

   0     6,606     1,854      —     30,715  

Richard A. Meier

   30,254     0     2,369      —     32,623  

Erika T. Davis

   31,253     490     2,468      —     47,345  

Charles C. Colpo

   —       —       —        —     —    

Grace R. den Hartog

   0     0     20,976      —     337,629  

Brian J. Shotto

   171,346     10,946     12,985      —     432,049  
(a)  (b)   (c)   (d)   (e)  (f) 

Name

   



Executive
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year

($) (1)




 

 

   


Registrant
Contributions
in Last

Fiscal Year

($) (2)



 

 

 

   




Aggregate
Earnings
(Losses)

in Last
Fiscal
Year

($) (3)



 



 

 

  

 

Aggregate 
Withdrawals / 
Distributions 

($) 

   


Aggregate
Balance
at

Last Fiscal

Year-End

($)



 

 

 

 

P. Cody Phipps

  $—     $—     $—     —    $—   

Richard A. Meier

   33,815    42,721    74,859   —     415,116 

Stuart Morris-Hipkins

   —      —      —     —     —   

Charles C. Colpo

   —      —      —     —     —   

Rony C. Kordahi

   —      —      —     —     —   

(1) Executive contributions included in “Salary” for 2014 in the Summary Compensation Table.that can be deferred may include up to 75% of base salary and 100% of annual incentive cash compensation.

(2) Company contributions included in “All Other Compensation” for 20142017 in the Summary Compensation Table.

(3) Deferred amounts earned returns based on the performance of the funds into which they were invested, which consist ofbasically the same funds available to the participants under our 401(k) plan (other than the Company stock fund).plan.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

The following table reflects the estimated potential compensation payable to each of the NEOs under the Company’s compensation and benefit plans and arrangements in the event of termination of such executive’s employment under various scenarios, including voluntary termination without cause, voluntary termination or involuntary termination with cause, termination following a change in control and termination due to disability or death. Benefits payable to the NEOs upon retirement are described under “Retirement Plans” beginning on page 5159 of this proxy statement. The amounts shown are estimates of the amounts that would be paid out to the executives upon termination of their employment assuming that such termination was effective December 31, 2014.2017.

 

   

Cash Severance

Payment

($)

  Incremental
Pension Benefit
(present value)  (5)
($)
  Continuation
of Medical /
Welfare Benefits
(present value)
($)
  

Acceleration and

Continuation

of Equity

Awards (6)

($)

  

Total Termination

Benefits

($)

 

Craig R. Smith (1)

                    

•      Involuntary Termination Without Cause (2)

 $1,125,000   $—     $44,624   $907,234   $2,076,858  

•      Voluntary Termination or Involuntary Termination With Cause

  —      —      —      —      —    

•      Involuntary or Good Reason Termination after Change In Control (3)

  2,380,953    2,037,098    29,499    3,243,701    7,691,251  

•      Disability (4)

  —      —      —      1,548,221    1,548,221  

•      Death (4)

  —      —      —      2,703,084    2,703,084  

James L. Bierman (1)

                    

•      Involuntary Termination Without Cause (2)

 $652,405   $—     $22,856   $939,620   $1,614,881  

•      Voluntary Termination or Involuntary Termination With Cause

  —      —      —      —      —    

•      Involuntary or Good Reason Termination after Change In Control (3)

  2,600,919    —      30,949    3,719,876    6,351,744  

•      Disability (4)

  —      —      —      1,210,392    1,210,392  

•      Death (4)

  —      —      —      3,099,897    3,099,897  

Richard A. Meier (1)

                    

•      Involuntary Termination Without Cause (2)

 $1,095,375   $—     $32,873   $502,519   $1,630,767  

•      Voluntary Termination or Involuntary Termination With Cause

  —      —      —      —      —    

•      Involuntary or Good Reason Termination after Change In Control (3)

  2,183,447    N/A    36,831    2,137,272    4,357,550  

•      Disability (4)

  —      —      —      781,725    781,725  

•      Death (4)

  —      —      —      1,781,060    1,781,060  

Erika T. Davis (1)

                    

•      Involuntary Termination Without Cause (2)

 $778,044   $—     $31,986   $392,600   $1,202,630  

•      Voluntary Termination or Involuntary Termination With Cause

  —      —      —      —      —    

•      Involuntary or Good Reason Termination after Change In Control (3)

  1,550,900    —      35,648    1,333,773    2,920,321  

•      Disability (4)

  —      —      —      602,224    602,224  

•      Death (4)

  —      —      —      1,111,477    1,111,477  
   

Cash Severance

Payment

($)

  Incremental
Pension Benefit
(present value)  (5)
($)
  Continuation
of Medical /
Welfare Benefits
(present value)
($)
  

Acceleration and

Continuation

of Equity

Awards (6)

($)

  

Total Termination

Benefits

($)

 

P. Cody Phipps (1)

                    

•           Involuntary Termination Without Cause (2)

 $3,113,438  $—    $51,749  $3,169,964  $6,335,152 

•           Voluntary Termination or Involuntary Termination With Cause

  —     —     —     —     —   

•           Involuntary or Good Reason Termination after Change In Control (3)

  6,385,240   —     38,999   9,184,063   15,608,301 

•           Disability (4)

  2,855,376   —     —     4,400,954   7,256,330 

•           Death (4)

  —     —     —     7,653,386   7,653,386 

Richard A. Meier (1)

                    

•           Involuntary Termination Without Cause (2)

 $1,474,884  $—    $31,570  $838,027  $2,344,481 

•           Voluntary Termination or Involuntary Termination With Cause

  —     —     —     —     —   

•           Involuntary or Good Reason Termination after Change In Control (3)

  2,640,009   —     35,093   1,977,982   4,653,084 

•           Disability (4)

  1,125,306   —     —     1,084,125   2,209,430 

•           Death (4)

  —     —     —     1,648,318   1,648,318 

Stuart Morris-Hipkins (1)

                    

•           Involuntary Termination Without Cause (2)

 $637,500  $—    $29,007  $124,572  $791,080 

•           Voluntary Termination or Involuntary Termination With Cause

  —     —     —     —     —   

•           Involuntary or Good Reason Termination after Change In Control (3)

  1,270,750   —     31,677   865,210   2,167,637 

•           Disability (4)

  320,002   —     —     242,377   562,379 

•           Death (4)

  —     —     —     721,008   721,008 

Charles C. Colpo (1)

                    

•           Involuntary Termination Without Cause (2)

 $947,402  $—    $49,729  $277,283  $1,274,414 

•           Voluntary Termination or Involuntary Termination With Cause

  —     —     —     —     —   

•           Involuntary or Good Reason Termination
after Change In Control (3)

  1,888,489   299,369   59,306   760,313   3,007,476 

•           Disability (4)

  259,306   —     —     386,966   646,273 

•           Death (4)

  —     —     —     633,594   633,594 

   

Cash Severance

Payment

($)

  Incremental
Pension Benefit
(present value)  (5)
($)
  Continuation
of Medical /
Welfare Benefits
(present value)
($)
  

Acceleration and

Continuation

of Equity

Awards (6)

($)

  

Total Termination

Benefits

($)

 

Charles C. Colpo (1)

                    

•      Involuntary Termination Without Cause (2)

 $680,277    —     $23,947   $228,386   $932,610  

•      Voluntary Termination or Involuntary Termination With Cause

  —      —      —      —      —    

•      Involuntary or Good Reason Termination after Change In Control (3)

  1,356,018    380,372    24,930    789,343    2,550,663  

•      Disability (4)

  —      —      —      376,486    376,486  

•      Death (4)

  —      —      —      657,786    657,786  

Grace R. den Hartog (1)

                    

•      Involuntary Termination Without Cause (2)

 $420,834    —     $14,585   $355,196   $790,615  

•      Voluntary Termination or Involuntary Termination With Cause

  —      —      —      —      —    

•      Involuntary or Good Reason Termination after Change In Control (3)

  1,372,684    221,136    24,822    1,177,716    2,796,358  

•      Disability (4)

  —      —      —      565,777    565,777  

•      Death (4)

  —      —      —      981,430    981,430  

Brian J. Shotto (1), (7)

                    

•      Involuntary Termination Without Cause (2)

 $761,538    —     $21,862   $286,430   $1,069,830  

   

Cash Severance

Payment

($)

  Incremental
Pension Benefit
(present value)  (5)
($)
  Continuation
of Medical /
Welfare Benefits
(present value)
($)
  

Acceleration and

Continuation

of Equity

Awards (6)

($)

  

Total Termination

Benefits

($)

 

Rony C. Kordahi (1)

                    

•           Involuntary Termination Without Cause (2)

 $1,008,113  $—    $29,361  $256,401  $1,293,875 

•           Voluntary Termination or Involuntary Termination With Cause

  —     —     —     —     —   

•           Involuntary or Good Reason Termination after Change In Control (3)

  2,009,505   —     32,148   1,258,926   3,300,579 

•           Disability (4)

  382,501   —     —     498,984   881,485 

•           Death (4)

  —     —     —     1,049,105   1,049,105 

(1) The amounts shown in the table do not include accrued salary and vacation payable through the date of the executive’s employment termination or the distribution of any balances under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan or the Company’s 401(k) plan.

(2) See the discussion of the Company’s severance policy below for information on benefits payable to the NEOs upon involuntary termination without cause. The calculation of cash severance is based on an assumed lump1.5 multiplied by the sum payment of monthly salary plus the average of the lastNEO’s base annual salary and the lower of average bonus paid or target bonus for the three years’ actual bonuses paid multiplied by 18 months.calendar years prior to the date of employment termination.

(3) See the discussion of the Company’s change in control agreements belowon page 64 for information on benefits payable to the NEOs upon a change in control. The calculation of cash severance is based on a lump sum payment of 2.99 multiplied by the sum of annual salary plus the average of the last three years’ actual bonuses paid.

(4) A termination of employment due to death or disability entitles the NEOs to benefits under the Company’s life insurance or disability plan, as applicable, available to salaried teammates generally. In addition, and also as applicable to salaried employees generally who receive grants of stock options and restricted stock, upon termination of employment due to death, all stock options and shares of restricted stock immediately vest; and, upon termination of employment due to disability, unvested stock options are forfeited and shares of restricted stock vest on a pro rata basis. In addition, upon death, officers are entitled to receive performance shares that are actually earned based on achievement of performance conditions and, upon disability, a pro rata portion of any such shares earned relative to time worked during the performance period.

(5) If a participant’s employment is terminated without cause or the participant resigns for good reason following a change in control, the SERP provides for apro-rated benefit based on credited years of service

relative to years of service remaining to the participant’s earliest retirement eligibility date, which amount is reduced by 4% for each year that the participant is under age 65. The amounts in this column show the present value of any additional benefit to the participant relative to the present value of accumulated benefits shown in the “Pension Benefits Table” on page 52.60.

(6) The amounts in this column represent the estimated benefit to the NEO due to accelerated vesting of equity awards and are calculated based on the number of shares subject to accelerated vesting multiplied by $35.11,$18.88, the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 2014.29, 2017. Any performance shares that vest are valued based upon assumed performance at the target level.

(7) Mr. Shotto resigned at the request of the Company effective August 31, 2014 and, accordingly, actual termination payments and benefits to him in connection with his involuntary termination without cause are set forth in this table. In connection with Mr. Shotto’s termination of employment, a pro rata portion of his restricted stock vested and, through a negotiated agreement, his remaining shares of restricted stock will vest on their normal schedule. He forfeited all performance shares.

Severance Policy. The Company has an officer severance policy that applies to corporate officers who are involuntarily terminated without cause (or who resign at the request of the Company). The policy and that was designed to provide consistent and fair treatment of these departing officers and is based upon the officer’s years of service to the Company.officers. Receipt of payments under the severance policy is also conditioned upon the officer’s agreement to certainnon-competition andnon-solicitation restrictive covenants for the term of the severance period or one year, whichever is greater.

and a general release of claims against the Company. The Company provides for the following under its officer severance policy:

 

Officer PositionSeverance Amount

Severance

Period

Other Benefits

CEO

President

Chief Operating Officer

Executive Vice President

Senior Vice President

1.5 x the sum of:

•  Base Salary

•  The lower of average Bonus paid or Target Bonus for the three calendar years prior to date of employment termination

18 months

Continuation of Medical/Dental/Vision Benefits during severance period

Up to six months of outplacement services

Tax preparation and financial counseling services during severance period

Vice President

1.0 x the sum of:

•  Base Salary

•  The lower of average Bonus paid or Target Bonus for the three calendar years prior to date of employment termination

12 months

Continuation of Medical/Dental/Vision Benefits during severance period

Up to six months of outplacement services

between 9 and 18 months (based onAny termination of Mr. Phipps’ employment with the officer’s yearsCompany following the expiration of employment by the Company) of base monthly salary plus monthly bonus (based on the lower of average monthly bonus earned over the previously completed three years or target bonus for the current year), payable in a lump sum;

a pro rata amount of any cash incentive earned during the year of termination based onInitial Period shall be subject to the Company’s actual performanceexecutive severance policy existing at the time of such termination, and the number of months worked during the year;

upMr. Phipps shall be entitled to six months of outplacement services;

continuation of healthseverance benefits during the severance period; andonly in accordance with such policy.

tax return preparation and financial counseling for length of severance period.

The severance policy also provides that,does not address the disposition of outstanding stock options or stock awards upon involuntary termination without cause, which event is addressed under the applicable equity award agreement. In general, upon an involuntary termination without cause (or resignation at the request of the Company), (i) an executive officer’s unvested stock options are forfeited and the vested stock options must be exercised within a period of one year from the date of employment termination. In addition,termination, and (ii) a pro rata portion of the executive officer’s restricted stock awards and earned performance share awards (as applicable) vests at the date of employment termination based on the number of months worked during the applicable vesting and/or performance period.

Change in Control Agreements. The Company has entered into CIC Agreements with the NEOs, (other than Mr. Shotto), the purpose of which is to encourage key management personnel to remain with the Company and to avoid distractions resulting from potential or actual changes in control of the Company.

The CIC Agreements provide for the payment of a severance benefit if the officer’s employment with the Company is terminated within 24 months after a change in control unless such termination is (i) due to death or disability, (ii) by the Company for cause or (iii) by the officer other than in specified circumstances constituting good reason.

Termination of employment by the Company is for cause if it is because of the executive officer’s (i) willful and continued failure to substantially perform his or her duties (other than due to incapacity, illness, etc.) or (ii) engaging in conduct demonstrably and materially injurious to the Company. Termination of employment by

the executive officer is for good reason if it is because of (i) a material diminution in authority, duties or

responsibilities; (ii) a material reduction in annual base salary, bonus opportunity or benefits; (iii) a relocation of place of employment by more than 35 miles or substantial increase in travel obligations; (iv) a failure to pay compensation due to the executive officer; or (v) certain other reasons defined in the plan.

A change in control is generally deemed to have occurred under the agreements:

 

 (i)if any person acquires 30% or more of the Company’s voting securities (other than the Company or its affiliates); except that, for the purposes of determining whether a change in control has occurred under the terms of the Company’s outstanding equity award agreements, shares issued by the Company directly to the acquirer shall not be taken into account when determining whether the 30% threshold has been met;

 

 (ii)if the Company’s directors as of the beginning or renewal date of the CIC Agreement (the “Incumbent Board”) cease to constitute a majority of the Board (unless the members’ nominations or elections were approved by a majority of the Incumbent Board);

 

 (iii)upon the approval by shareholders of a merger or consolidation of the Company (or any subsidiary) other than (a) a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent more than 50% of the voting power of the securities of the Company (or surviving entity) outstanding immediately after the merger or consolidation, or (b) a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company in which no person acquires more than 30% of the combined voting power of the Company’sthen-outstanding securities; or

 

 (iv)upon the approval by shareholders of a plan of liquidation or sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets.

The Company’s change in control agreements with its officers do not provide for or otherwise permit excise taxgross-up payments.

For the NEOs, the severance benefit includes the following:

 

 (i)a lump sum payment equal to 2.99 times the sum of the officer’s annual base salary as of the date of termination or change in control (whichever is greater) plus average bonus for the three years preceding the date of termination or change in control (whichever is greater);

 

 (ii)a lump sum amount representing a pro rata portion of any incentive compensation earned by the executive through the date of termination, assuming achievement of performance goals at the target level;

 

 (iii)an amount equal to additional premiums for continued medical benefits under COBRA for two years and additional premiums for individual life insurance policies for two years (for officers receiving Company-provided life insurance); and

 

 (iv)all shares of restricted stock granted to the executive officer vest, all stock options vest and become immediately exercisable and all performance shares are awarded at the target level and become vested.

The foregoing severance benefit is reduced by the amount of any benefits payable under any other severance plan or arrangement of the Company.

In consideration for any benefits paid, the change in control agreements impose certainnon-competition andnon-solicitation restrictive covenants on the officers for a period of 12 months following employment termination and prohibit the disclosure and use of confidential Company information. Each agreement continues in effect through December 31, 2015.2018.

CEO PAY RATIO

The table below sets forth comparative information regarding (A) the total compensation of the Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer as of December 31, 2017, (B) the total compensation of the “median employee” of the Company, identified using total cash compensation of all other employees of the Company, not including the Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, as of December 31, 2017, and (C) the estimated ratio of the Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation to the total compensation of the “median employee.” As of December 31, 2017, the Company had approximately 8,600 employees, approximately 6,200 in the U.S. and 2,400 outside of the U.S.

Chief Executive Officer Total Compensation (A)

  $6,682,035 

“Median employee” Total Compensation (B)

  $39,481 

Ratio of (A) to (B)

   169:1 

To identify the “median employee” for the above ratio calculation, pay elements that were included in the total cash compensation calculation for each employee are:

Annualized Base Salary as of December 31, 2017

2017 target annual incentive

Company-paid 401(k) Plan match for last fiscal year (2016) paid in 2017

Company-paid pension plan payments in 2017

Company-paid life insurance premiums as of December 31, 2017

Annualized automobile allowance as of December 31, 2017

Conversion rate to U.S. dollars based on December 31, 2017 exchange rates for compensation paid in foreign currency

Once the “median employee” was identified based on total cash compensation, the annual total compensation was calculated for such “median employee” using the same methodology used for the NEO set forth in the 2017 “Summary Compensation Table” in this proxy statement. This means that equity and any other longer-term incentives awarded, if any, are counted for the “median employee” and Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer. The estimated pay ratio was calculated in a manner consistent with the requirements of Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K of the Exchange Act (“Item 402(u)”), and we believe it constitutes a reasonable estimate. However, as contemplated by Item 402(u), we relied on methods and assumptions that we determined to be appropriate for calculating the pay ratio at the Company. Other public companies may use methods and assumptions that differ from the ones we chose but are appropriate for their circumstances. In light of these different methods and assumptions, the estimated pay ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.

PROPOSAL 4: ADVISORY SHAREHOLDER VOTE ONTO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ShareholdersIn accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, shareholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory vote onto approve the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay”“say-on-pay” proposal, gives shareholders the opportunity to approve, reject or abstain from voting with respect to our 20142017 executive compensation programs and policies and the compensation paid to our NEOs. Although the vote isnon-binding, we value yourour shareholders’ opinions and will consider the outcome of the vote in establishing compensation philosophy and making future compensation decisions. At the Company’s 20112016 annual meeting, the majority of our shareholders voted to advise us to include asay-on-pay proposal every year, and the Board of Directors determined that the Company will hold an advisory shareholder vote on executive compensation every year. Thisnon-binding advisory vote on the frequency ofsay-on-pay proposals must be held at least once every six years.

As more fully discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement beginning on page 27,33, the Company’s goal for its executive compensation program is to attract, motivate and retain a talented team of executives who will provide leadership for our success in the intensely competitive and constantly changing medical supplies distribution and logisticsglobal healthcare supply services markets.industry. We seek to accomplish this goal in a manner that rewards performance, is aligned with long-term shareholder interests and is consistent with sound compensation governance principles. The Compensation & Benefits Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the policies and procedures articulated in the CD&A are effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and in achieving our long-term goals and that the compensation of our NEOs in 20142017 reflects and supports these compensation policies and procedures and reflects our foundational pay for performance principles.

Accordingly, the Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote in favor of the following resolution:

RESOLVED,that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Proxy Statement for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and the related narrative disclosure.”

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the foregoing resolution approving, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS

The Company has not adopted written procedures for review of, or standards for approval of, related person transactions (as defined in Item 404 of RegulationS-K), but instead reviews these transactions on acase-by-case basis.

The Company employs the son of Mr. Smith, Executive Chairman of the Company, as General Manager of our Seattle-area distribution center. For 2014, Mr. Smith’s son received salary and equity compensation totaling $170,798.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Under regulations of the SEC, any shareholder desiring to make a proposal to be acted upon at the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must present such proposal to our Corporate Secretary at the Company’s principal office at 9120 Lockwood Boulevard, Mechanicsville, Virginia 23116 not later than November 18, 2015,26, 2018 in order for the proposal to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement. All shareholder proposals and director nominations must be submitted in accordance with and contain the information required by our Bylaws, which are available as described under “Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Materials” on page 3 of this proxy statement. The Company will determine whether to include properly submitted proposals in the proxy statement in accordance with the SEC’s regulations governing the solicitation of proxies.

Our Bylaws provide that a shareholder of the Company entitled to vote for the election of directors may nominate persons for election as directors only at an annual meeting and if written notice of such shareholder’s intent to make such nomination or nominations has been given to our Corporate Secretary not later than 120 days before the anniversary of the date of the Company’s immediately preceding annual meeting. The Corporate Secretary must receive written notice of a shareholder nomination to be acted upon at the 20162019 Annual Meeting not later than the close of business on December 31, 2015.January 8, 2019. The shareholder’s notice must include the information required by our Bylaws, including but not limited to:

 

the name and address of record of the shareholder intending to make the nomination, the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made and of the person or persons to be nominated;

 

a representation that such shareholder is a shareholder of record and intends to appear in person or by proxy at such meeting to nominate the director candidate;

 

the class and number of shares of Common Stock that are owned by such shareholder and such beneficial owners;

 

a description of all arrangements, understandings or relationships between such shareholder and each director nominee and any other person(s) (naming such person(s)) pursuant to which the nomination is to be made by such shareholder;

 

a description (including the names of any counterparties) of any agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any derivative or short positions, profit interests, options, hedging transactions and borrowed or loaned shares) that has been entered into as of the date of the shareholder’s notice by, or on behalf of, the shareholder and any other person on whose behalf the nomination is made, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss, manage risk or benefit resulting from share price changes of, or increase or decrease the voting power of the shareholder or any other person on whose behalf the nomination is made with respect to, shares of stock of the Company;

 

a description (including the names of any counterparties) of any agreement, arrangement or understanding with respect to such nomination between or among the shareholder or any other person on whose behalf the nomination is made and any of its affiliates or associates, and any others acting in concert with any of the foregoing;

 

a representation that the shareholder will notify the Company in writing of any changes to certain information provided above (as further specified in the Bylaws);

 

such other information regarding each nominee proposed by such shareholder as would be required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise required to be disclosed, pursuant to the proxy rules of the SEC, had the nominee been nominated, or intended to be nominated, by the Board of Directors; and

 

the written consent of the nominee to serve as a director if elected.

In order for a shareholder to bring other business before a shareholder meeting, timely notice must be received by the Company within the time limits described in the immediately preceding paragraph. The shareholder’s notice must contain the information required by our Bylaws, including but not limited to:

 

the information described above with respect to the shareholder proposing such business;

 

a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, including the complete text of any resolutions to be presented at the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting; and

 

any material interest of such shareholder and such beneficial owner in such business.

The requirements found in our Bylaws are separate from the requirements a shareholder must meet to have a proposal included in the Company’s proxy statement under the proxy rules.

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors is not aware of any matters to be presented for action at the annual meeting other than as set forth in this proxy statement. However, if any other matters properly come before the annual meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, the person or persons voting the proxies will vote them in accordance with their best judgment.

March 18, 201526, 2018

 

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

LOGO

GNRACEICHOLAS R.J. PDEN HARTOGACE

SeniorExecutive Vice President, General Counsel, & Corporate Secretary & Communications

Appendix A

 

OWENS & MINOR, INC.

20152018 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


Table of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Table of Contents   iPage No. 

ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS

  A-1 

1.01.

  1.01.Administrator  A-1 

1.02.

  1.02.Agreement  A-1 

1.03.

  1.03.Board  A-1 

1.04.

  1.04.Change in Control  A-1 

1.05.

  1.05.Code  A-2 

1.06.

  1.06.Committee  A-2 

1.07.

  1.07.Common Stock  A-2 

1.08.

  1.08.Company  A-2 

1.09.

  1.09.Compensation Committee  A-2 

1.10.

  1.10.Control Change Date  A-2 

1.11.

  1.11.Corresponding SAR  A-2 

1.12.

  1.12.Exchange Act  A-2 

1.13.

  1.13.Expiration Date  A-2 

1.14.

  1.14.Fair Market ValueA-2
1.15.Governance Committee  A-3 

1.15.

  1.16.Incentive AwardGovernance Committee  A-3 

1.16.

  1.17.Initial ValueIncentive Award  A-3 

1.17.

  1.18.Nonemployee DirectorInitial Value  A-3 

1.18.

  1.19.OptionNonemployee Director  A-3 

1.19.

  1.20.ParticipantOption  A-3 

1.20.

  1.21.Performance GoalParticipant  A-3 

1.21.

  1.22.Performance Goal A-3

1.22.

  PlanA-4

1.23.

Pre-Existing PlanA-4

1.24.

Related EntityA-4

1.25.

SARA-4

1.26.

Stock AwardA-4

1.27.

Stock Unit AwardA-4

1.28.

Ten Percent Shareholder  A-4 
1.23.Related EntityA-4
1.24.SARA-4
1.25.Stock AwardA-4
1.26.Stock Unit AwardA-4
1.27.Ten Percent ShareholderA-4

ARTICLE II PURPOSES

  A-5 

ARTICLE III ADMINISTRATION

  A-5 

ARTICLE IV ELIGIBILITY

A-6

4.01.

GeneralA-6

4.02.

GrantsA-6

4.03.

General Terms of Awards  A-6 
4.01.General.A-6
4.02.Grants.A-6

ARTICLE V STOCK SUBJECT TO PLAN

A-6
5.01.Shares Issued.A-6
5.02.Aggregate Limit.A-6
5.03.Individual Limitations.A-6
5.04.Share Add-Backs.

  A-7 
ARTICLE VI OPTIONS AND SARS

5.01.

Shares Issued  A-7 

5.02.

  6.01.Awards.Aggregate Limit  A-7 

5.03.

  6.02.Option Price.Individual Limitations  A-7 

5.04.

  6.03.ShareAdd-Backs A-7

5.05.

  Maximum Option or SAR Period.Nontransferability  A-8 

5.06.

  6.04.Nontransferability.Transferable Options and SARs  A-8 

5.07.

  6.05.Transferable Options and SARs.A-8
6.06.Exercise.A-8
6.07.Payment.Dividend Equivalents  A-9 
6.08.

ARTICLE VI OPTIONS AND SARS

 A-9

6.01.

  AwardsA-9

6.02.

Option PriceA-9

(i)


Page No.

6.03.

Maximum Option or SAR PeriodA-9

6.04.

ExerciseA-10

6.05.

PaymentA-10

6.06.

Determination of Payment of Cash and/or Common Stock Upon Exercise of SAR.A-9
6.09.Shareholder Rights.A-9
6.10.Automatic ExerciseA-9

(i)


ARTICLE VII STOCK AWARDS

A-9
7.01.Awards.A-9
7.02.Vesting.A-9
7.03.Shareholder Rights.SAR  A-10 

ARTICLE VIII STOCK UNIT AWARDS6.07.

Shareholder RightsA-10

6.08.

Automatic Exercise  A-10 
8.01.Award.

ARTICLE VII STOCK AWARDS

  A-10A-11 

7.01.

  8.02.Earning the AwardAwards  A-10A-11 

7.02.

  8.03.Payment.Vesting  A-10A-11 

7.03.

  8.04.Shareholder Rights.Rights  A-11 
8.05.Dividend Equivalents.

ARTICLE VIII STOCK UNIT AWARDS

  A-11 

ARTICLE IX INCENTIVE AWARDS8.01.

Award  A-11 

8.02.

  9.01.Awards.Earning the Award  A-11 

8.03.

  9.02.Terms and Conditions.Payment  A-11A-12 

8.04.

  9.03.NontransferabilityShareholder Rights  A-11A-12 

8.05.

  9.04.Employee StatusA-11
9.05.SettlementDividend Equivalents  A-12 
9.06.Shareholder RightsA-12

ARTICLE X ADJUSTMENT UPON CHANGE IN COMMON STOCKIX INCENTIVE AWARDS

  A-12 

ARTICLE XI CHANGE IN CONTROL9.01.

Awards  A-12 

9.02.

  11.01.Impact of Change in Control.Terms and Conditions  A-12 

9.03.

  11.02.Nontransferability A-13

9.04.

  Assumption Upon Change in Control.Employee StatusA-13

9.05.

SettlementA-13

9.06.

Shareholder Rights  A-13 
11.03.Cash-Out Upon Change in Control.

ARTICLE X ADJUSTMENT UPON CHANGE IN COMMON STOCK

  A-13 
ARTICLE XI CHANGE IN CONTROLA-14

11.01.

Impact of Change in ControlA-14

11.02.

Assumption Upon Change in ControlA-14

11.03.

Cash-Out Upon Change in ControlA-14
ARTICLE XII COMPLIANCE WITH LAW AND APPROVAL OF REGULATORY BODIES

A-13

ARTICLE XIII GENERAL PROVISIONS

A-13
13.01.Effect on Employment or Service.A-13
13.02.Unfunded Plan.A-13
13.03.Disposition of Stock.A-14
13.04.Rules of Construction.A-14
13.05.Employee Status.A-14
13.06.Withholding Taxes.A-14
13.07.Certain Reduction of Parachute Payments  A-15 
13.08.

ARTICLE XIII GENERAL PROVISIONS

 A-15

13.01.

  ReturnEffect on Employment or ServiceA-15

13.02.

Unfunded PlanA-15

13.03.

Disposition of Awards; Repayment.StockA-15

13.04.

Rules of ConstructionA-15

13.05.

Employee Status  A-16 

ARTICLE XIV AMENDMENT13.06.

Withholding Taxes  A-16 

ARTICLE XV DURATION OF PLAN13.07.

Certain Reduction of Parachute Payments  A-16 

13.08.

Return of Awards; RepaymentA-17

13.09.

Deferral of AwardsA-18

13.10.

Extension of Term of AwardA-18

13.11.

Section 162(m) Transition RuleA-18

ARTICLE XIV AMENDMENT

A-18

ARTICLE XV DURATION OF PLAN

A-19

ARTICLE XVI EFFECTIVE DATE OF PLAN

  A-16A-19 

 

(ii)


OWENS & MINOR, INC.

20152018 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

ARTICLE I

DEFINITIONS

 

1.01.ADMINISTRATOR

Administrator means the Governance Committee with respect to awards to Nonemployee Directors and in all other instances means the Compensation Committee or a delegate of the Compensation Committee that is appointed in accordance with Article III.

 

1.02.AGREEMENT

Agreement means a written or electronic agreement (including any amendment or supplement thereto) between the Company and a Participant specifying the terms and conditions of a Stock Unit Award, a Stock Award, Incentive Award, Option or SAR granted to such Participant.

 

1.03.BOARD

Board means the Board of Directors of the Company.

 

1.04.CHANGEIN CONTROL

Change in Control means:

(a) Any “person,” as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (other than the Company, any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company, or any Company owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company), is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing thirty percent (30%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities provided, however, that Company securities acquired directly from the Company shall be disregarded for this purpose;

(b) During any period of twelve (12) consecutive months, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board, and any new director (other than a director designated by a person who has entered into an agreement with the Company to effect a transaction described in clause (a), (c) or (d) of this Section and other than a director initially elected or nominated as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to directors) whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors then still in office who either (x) were directors at the beginning of such period or (y) were so elected or nominated with such approval, cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board;

(c) There is consummated a stockholder-approved merger or consolidation of the Company with any other Company, other than (x) a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) more than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation or (y) a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction) in which no “person” (as hereinabove defined) acquires more than thirty percent (30%) of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; or

(d) The stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company orThere is consummated an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

(e) The stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company.

In addition, if a Change in Control (as defined in clauses (a), (b), (c) or (d) above) constitutes a payment event with respect to any Option, SAR, Stock Award, Stock Unit award or Incentive Award that provides for the deferral of compensation and is subject to Section 409A of the Code, no payment will be made under that award on account of a Change in Control unless the event described in clause (a), (b), (c) or (d) above, as applicable, constitutes a “change in control event” as defined in Treasury RegulationSection 1.409A-3(i)(5).

 

1.05.CODE

Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and any amendments thereto.

 

1.06.COMMITTEE

Committee means the Governance Committee in respect of awards to Nonemployee Directors and the Compensation Committee in respect of awards to other individuals who are eligible to participate in the Plan.

 

1.07.COMMON STOCK

Common Stock means the common stock of the Company.

 

1.08.COMPANY

Company means Owens & Minor, Inc.

 

1.09.COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Compensation Committee means the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board.

 

1.10.CONTROL CHANGE DATE

Control Change Date means the date on which a Change in Control occurs. If a Change in Control occurs on account of a series of transactions, the Control Change Date is the date of the last of such transactions.

 

1.11.CORRESPONDING SAR

Corresponding SAR means an SAR that is granted in relation to a particular Option and that can be exercised only upon the surrender to the Company, unexercised, of that portion of the Option to which the SAR relates.

 

1.12.EXCHANGE ACT

Exchange Act means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

1.13.EXPIRATION DATE

Expiration Date means the last day of the stated term of an Option or SAR,i.e., the last day that the Option or SAR could be exercised if the Participant remained in continuous employment or service from the date of grant of the Option or SAR.

1.14.FAIR MARKET VALUE

Fair Market Value means, on any given date, the closing price of a share of Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape on such date, or if the Common Stock was not traded on the New York Stock Exchange on such day, then on the next preceding day that the Common Stock was traded on such exchange, all as reported by such source as the Administrator may select.

1.15.GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Governance Committee means the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board.

 

1.16.INCENTIVE AWARD

Incentive Award means an award that subject to such terms and conditions as may be prescribed by the Administrator, entitles the Participant to receive a payment from the Company or a Related Entity that may be in cash, Common Stock or a combination of cash and Common Stock.

 

1.17.INITIAL VALUE

Initial Value means, with respect to a Corresponding SAR, the Option price per share of the related Option and, with respect to an SAR granted independently of an Option, the amount determined by the Administrator on the date of grant (but not less than the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock on the date of grant). Except as provided in Article X, without the approval of shareholders (a) the Initial Value of an outstanding SAR may not be reduced (by amendment, cancellation and new grant or otherwise) without the approval of shareholders and (b) no payment may be made to cancel an outstanding SAR if on the date of such amendment, cancellation, new grant or payment the Initial Value exceeds the Fair Market Value.

 

1.18.NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTOR

Nonemployee Director means a member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company or a Related Entity.

 

1.19.OPTION

Option means a stock option that entitles the holder to purchase from the Company a stated number of shares of Common Stock at the price set forth in an Agreement.

 

1.20.PARTICIPANT

Participant means an employee of the Company or a Related Entity, a member of the Board, or an individual who provides services to the Company or a Related Entity who satisfies the requirements of Article IV and is selected by the Administrator to receive a Stock Unit Award, a Stock Award, an Option, an SAR, or an Incentive Award or a combination thereof.

 

1.21.PERFORMANCE GOAL

Performance Goal means a performance objective that is stated with respect to one or more ofbusiness criteria that the following,Administrator may select, alone or in combination:combination, including without limitation any of the following: (i) gross, operating or net earnings before or after taxes; (ii) return on equity; (iii) return on capital; (iv) return on sales; (v) return on assets or net assets; (vi) earnings per share; (vii) cash flow per share; (viii) book value per share; (ix) earnings growth; (x) sales or sales growth; (xi) volume growth; (xii) cash flow (as defined by the Committee); (xiii) Fair Market Value; (xiv) total shareholder return; (xv) market share; (xvi) productivity; (xvii) level of expenses; (xviii) quality; (xix) safety; (xx) customer satisfaction; (xxi) total economic value added; (xxii) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and (xxiii) revenues or revenue growth. If the Committee, on the date of the award, prescribes that the Participant’s rights in the award shall become exercisable, transferable or nonforfeitable only upon the attainment of objectives stated with respect to one or more of the foregoing Performance Goals, the Participant’s rights in the award shall become exercisable, transferable or nonforfeitable only to the extent that the Committee certifies in writing that such objectives have been achieved.

A Performance Goal may be expressed with respect to the Company, a Related Entity, or a business unit of the Company or a Related Entity.Entity, any subset thereof or any other way the Administrator may determine. A Performance Goal also may be expressed on an absolute basis or relative to the performance of one or more similarly situated companies or a published index.index or otherwise. When establishing Performance Goals or determining if the Performance Goals were achieved, the Committee may exclude any or all special, unusual or extraordinary items as determined under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, including, without limitation, the charges or cost associated with restructurings of the Company, discontinued operations, other unusual ornon-recurring items and the cumulative effects of accounting changes. To the extent permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code (for any award that is intended to constitute “performance based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code), theThe Committee may also adjust Performance Goals as it deems equitable, including without limitation in recognition of unusual ornon-recurring events affecting the Company, changes in applicable tax laws or accounting principles or such other factors as the Committee may determine.

 

1.22.PLAN

Plan means the Owens & Minor, Inc. 20152018 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

1.23.PRE-EXISTING PLAN

Pre-Existing Plan means the Owens & Minor, Inc. 2015 Stock Incentive Plan.

1.24.RELATED ENTITY

Related Entity means any “subsidiary” or “parent” corporation (within the meaning of Section 424 of the Code) of the Company.

 

1.24.1.25.SAR

SAR means a stock appreciation right that in accordance with the terms of an Agreement entitles the holder to receive, with respect to each share of Common Stock encompassed by the exercise of such SAR, the excess of the Fair Market Value at the time of exercise over the Initial Value or a lesser amount as determined by the Administrator and specified in an Agreement. References to “SARs” include both Corresponding SARs and SARs granted independently of Options, unless the context requires otherwise.

 

1.25.1.26.STOCK AWARD

Stock Award means shares of Common Stock awarded to a Participant under Article VII, including Common Stock issued in settlement of a Stock Unit Award.

 

1.26.1.27.STOCK UNIT AWARD

Stock Unit Award means an award that entitles the Participant to receive a benefit based on a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the number of stock units covered by the Stock Unit Award.

 

1.27.1.28.TEN PERCENT SHAREHOLDER

Ten Percent Shareholder means any individual owning more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or of a Related Entity. An individual shall be considered to own any voting stock owned (directly or indirectly) by or for his or her brothers, sisters, spouse, ancestors or lineal descendants and shall be considered to own proportionately any voting stock owned (directly or indirectly) by or for a corporation, partnership, estate or trust of which such individual is a shareholder, partner or beneficiary.

ARTICLE II

PURPOSES

The Plan is intended to (a) assist the Company and Related Entities in recruiting and retaining key employees and members of the Board, and other individuals who provide services to the Company or a Related Entity, (b) authorize the grant of incentive compensation opportunities for such persons and (c) encourage such persons to identify their interests with those of the Company and its shareholders by enabling such persons to participate in the future success of the Company and the Related Entities. The Plan is intended to permit the grant of Stock Unit Awards, Stock Awards, SARs, the grant of both Options qualifying under Section 422 of the Code (“incentive stock options”) and Options not so qualifying, and the grant of Incentive Awards. No Option that is intended to be an incentive stock option shall be invalid for failure to qualify as an incentive stock option.

ARTICLE III

ADMINISTRATION

The Plan shall be administered by the Administrator. The Administrator shall have authority to grant Stock Unit Awards, Stock Awards, Incentive Awards, Options and SARs upon such terms (not inconsistent with the provisions of this Plan) as the Administrator may consider appropriate. Such terms may include conditions (in addition to those contained in this Plan) on the exercisability of all or any part of an Option or SAR or on the transferability or forfeitability of a Stock Award, Incentive Award, or Stock Unit Award, including by way of example and not limitation, conditions on which Participants may defer receipt of benefits under the Plan, requirements that the Participant complete a specified period of employment or service with the Company or a Related Entity or that the Company or Related Entity achieve a specified level of financial performance. Notwithstanding any such conditions or any provision of the Plan, (i) the Committee may accelerate the time at which anyan Option or SAR may be exercised, or the time at which a Stock Award may become transferable or nonforfeitable or the time at which an Incentive Award or Stock Unit Award may be settled (a) in connection with a termination of employment or service (including but not limited to death, disability, retirement or involuntary termination) or (b) if the award has beenis outstanding for at least one year, and (ii) up to 300,000five percent (5%) of the available shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Plan (subject to adjustments as set forth in Article X) may be issued under the Plan pursuant to awards without regard to the preceding clause (i) or the minimum vesting requirements of Sections 6.06, 7.02, 8.02 and 9.02any restrictions upon any such acceleration (either pursuant to the original terms of the award or by acceleration). In addition, theThe Administrator shall have complete authority to interpret all provisions of this Plan; to prescribe the form of Agreements; to adopt, amend, and rescind rules and regulations pertaining to the administration of the Plan; and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of this Plan. The express grant in the Plan of any specific power to the Administrator shall not be construed as limiting any power or authority of the Administrator. Any decision made, or action taken, by the Administrator or in connection with the administration of this Plan shall be final and conclusive. Neither the Administrator nor any member of the Committee shall be liable for any act done in good faith with respect to this Plan or any Agreement, Option, SAR, Stock Award, Incentive Award or Stock Unit Award. All expenses of administering this Plan shall be borne by the Company.

The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may delegate to one or more officers of the Company all or part of the Compensation Committee’s authority and duties with respect to grants and awards to individuals who are not subject to the reporting and other provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. The Compensation Committee may revoke or amend the terms of a delegation at any time, but such action shall not invalidate any prior actions of the Compensation Committee’s delegate or delegates that were consistent with the terms of the Plan.

ARTICLE IV

ELIGIBILITY

 

4.01.GENERAL.

Any employee of the Company or a Related Entity (including a corporation that becomes a Related Entity after the adoption of this Plan), any member of the Board (whether or not an employee), or a person who provides services to the Company or a Related Entity (including a corporation that becomes a Related Company after the adoption of this Plan)is eligible to participate in this Plan if the Administrator, in its sole discretion, determines that such person has contributed significantly or can be expected to contribute significantly to the profits or growth of the Company or a Related Entity.

 

4.02.GRANTS.

The Administrator will designate individuals to whom Stock Awards, Incentive Awards, Stock Unit Awards, Options and SARs are to be granted and will specify the number of shares of Common Stock subject to each award or grant; provided, however, that only individuals who provide “direct services” to the Company or a Related Entity (as the term “direct services” is used for purposes of Section 409A of the Code) may be granted an Option or SAR. An SAR may be granted with or without a related Option. All Stock Awards, Stock Unit Awards, Options, SARs, and Incentive Awards granted under this Plan shall be evidenced by Agreements which shall be subject to the applicable provisions of this Plan and to such other provisions as the Administrator may adopt. No Participant may be granted incentive stock options or related SARs (under all incentive stock option plans of the Company and any Related Entity) which are first exercisable in any calendar year for stock having an aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the date an Option is granted) that exceed the limitation prescribed by Code section 422(d). The preceding annual limitation shall not apply with respect to Options that are not incentive stock options.

4.03.GENERAL TERMSOF AWARDS

Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary and subject to the immediately following provision, (i) no Option or SAR shall be exercisable, (ii) no Stock Award (other than a Stock Award granted in connection with a Stock Unit Award that becomes earned and convertible into a transferable and nonforfeitable Stock Award) will become transferable and nonforfeitable, (iii) no Stock Unit Award shall be earned and convertible into a transferable and nonforfeitable Stock Award, and (iv) no Incentive Award shall be earned, earlier than the first anniversary of the date the Option, SAR, Stock Award, Stock Unit Award or Incentive Award is granted, except with respect to Options, SARs, Stock Awards, Stock Unit Awards and Incentive Awards granted to Nonemployee Directors, which are permitted to vest earlier than suchone-year anniversary, upon the annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company that occurs in the year immediately following the year in which the award is granted; provided, however, that (i) the Administrator may grant awards without regard to the foregoing minimum vesting requirements with respect to a maximum of five percent (5%) of the available shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Plan (subject to adjustments as set forth in Article X) and (ii) to the extent awards granted to Nonemployee Directors vest as of a date that is earlier than two weeks prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding year’s annual shareholders meeting, such awards will count against the five percent (5%) limitation. For the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing restriction does not apply to the Administrator’s discretion to provide in the terms of the award or otherwise for accelerated exercisability or vesting of any award upon the death or disability of the Participant or as set forth in Section 11.02 upon a Change in Control.

ARTICLE V

STOCK SUBJECT TO PLAN

 

5.01.SHARES ISSUED.

Upon the award of shares of Common Stock pursuant to a Stock Award, including a Stock Award issued to settle Stock Unit Awards, the Company may issue shares of Common Stock from its authorized but unissued Common Stock. Upon the exercise of any Option or SAR the Company may deliver to the Participant (or the Participant’s broker if the Participant so directs), shares of Common Stock from its authorized but unissued Common Stock.

 

5.02.AGGREGATE LIMIT.

The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under this Plan andshall be 3,600,000 shares, less the maximumnumber of shares of Common Stock subject to awards granted under thePre-Existing Plan after March 1, 2018, plus the number of shares of Common Stock subject to awards granted under thePre-Existing Plan which become available in accordance with Section 5.04 below after March 1, 2018; provided, however, the total number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of incentive stock options is 3,000,000 shares.shall not exceed 3,600,000 shares of Common Stock. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under this Plan and under incentive stock options shall be subject to adjustment as provided in Article X and Section 5.04. The grant of a Stock Unit Award shall reduce theExcept as otherwise set forth herein, shares of Common Stock covered by an Award shall only be counted as used to the extent actually used. If the stockholders of the Company approve the Plan, no further awards will be granted under thePre-Existing Plan after the stockholders approve the Plan; provided, however, that remain available for issuance undernothing in this Plan shall affect any awards granted under thePre-Existing Plan which are outstanding on a one-for-one basis but the issuancedate the stockholders of a Stock Award in settlement of a Stock Unit Award and related dividend equivalents shall not further reduce the Company approve the Plan until such time, if any, that any shares of Common Stock that remainsubject to such awards granted under thePre-Existing Plan become available for issuance underin accordance with the provisions of the Plan.

 

5.03.INDIVIDUAL LIMITATIONS.

Subject to the limitation set forth in the preceding sections, no individual may, in any calendar year, be granted or awarded (i) Options or SARs, covering more than 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock; (ii) Stock Awards and

Stock Unit Awards covering more than 500,0001,000,000 shares of Common Stock; or (iii) Incentive Awards exceeding $5,000,000.$10,000,000. Each of the limitations in the preceding sentence shall be multiplied by two with respect to awards granted to a Participant (other than a Nonemployee Director) during the calendar year in which the Participant first commences employment with the Company or a Related Entity. Notwithstanding the preceding sentences, no Participant who is a Nonemployee Director may innot be granted awards during any single calendar year be granted (i) Options or SARs covering more than 60,000 sharesthat, taken together with any cash fees paid to such Nonemployee Director during such calendar year in respect of Common Stock or (ii) Stock Awards and Stock Unit Awards covering more than 20,000 shares of Common Stock. In applying the limitations of this Section 5.03, an Option and Corresponding SAR shall be treatedNonemployee Director’s service as a single award.member of the Board, exceeds $750,000 in total value (calculating the value of any such awards based on the grant date fair value of such awards for financial accounting purposes). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may make exceptions to the foregoing limit (up to twice such limit) for anon-executive chair of the Board or, in extraordinary circumstances, for other individual Nonemployee Directors, as the Committee may determine, provided that the Nonemployee Director receiving such awards may not participate in the decision to make such awards. The limitations set forth in this Section 5.03 shall be subject to adjustment as provided in Article X.

 

5.04.SHARE ADD-BACKS.

If any shares of Common Stock subject to Stock Unit Awards, orIncentive Awards, Options, SARs or Stock Awards granted under the Plan, or any awards granted under thePre-Existing Plan that are outstanding after March 1, 2018, are cancelled, forfeited, expire or otherwise terminate without the issuance of such shares of Common Stock, or if any such award is settled for cash or otherwise does not result in the issuance of all or a portion of the shares of Common Stock subject to

such award, the shares of Common Stock subject to the award shall, to the extent of such cancellation, forfeiture, expiration, termination, cash settlement ornon-issuance, again be available for issuance under the Plan.

In the event that (i) any Option granted under the Plan (or any Option granted under thePre-Existing Plan that is outstanding after March 1, 2018) is exercised through the tendering of shares of Common Stock (either actually or by attestation) or by the withholding of shares of Common Stock by the Company, or (ii) withholding tax liabilities resulting from any such Option or other award granted under the Plan (or any award granted under thePre-Existing Plan and outstanding after March 1, 2018) are satisfied by the withholding of shares of Common Stock (not(subject to exceed the minimum required tax withholding rate)restrictions set forth in the Plan), then the number of shares tendered or withheld shall not be available for future grants of awards. Except as set forth in the following sentence, each share of Common Stock issued in connection with an award under the Plan shall reduce the total number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan by one. If Common Stock is issued in settlement of an SAR granted under the Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock available under the Plan shall be reduced by the number of shares of Common Stock for which the SAR was exercised rather than the number of shares of Common Stock issued in settlement of the SAR. Furthermore, shares of Common Stock issued by the Company in assumption of, or in substitution or exchange for, awards previously granted, or the right or obligation to make future awards by a company acquired by the Company or Related Entity, or with which the Company or Related Entity combines, shall not reduce the maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan.Plan (to the extent permitted by applicable stock exchange rules), and available shares of stock under a shareholder-approved plan of any such acquired company (as appropriately adjusted to reflect the transaction) also may be used for awards under the Plan, which shall not reduce the number of shares of Common Stock otherwise available under the Plan (subject to applicable stock exchange requirements). Shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan may not be increased through the Company’s purchase of shares of Common Stock on the open market with the proceeds obtained from the exercise of Options granted under the Plan (or Options granted under thePre-Existing Plan and outstanding after March 1, 2018).

5.05.NONTRANSFERABILITY

Except as provided in Section 5.06, each Option, SAR, Stock Award, Stock Unit Award and Incentive Award, granted under this Plan shall be nontransferable except by will, by the laws of descent and distribution or, after the Participant’s death, in accordance with a beneficiary designation form provided by the Company and signed by the Participant and filed with the Company. In the event of any transfer of an Option, the Option and any Corresponding SAR that relates to such Option must be transferred to the same person or person(s). During the lifetime of the Participant to whom the Option or SAR is granted, the Option or SAR may be exercised only by the Participant. No right or interest of a Participant in any Option, SAR, Stock Award, Stock Unit Award or Incentive Award shall be liable for, or subject to, any lien, obligation, or liability of such Participant.

5.06.TRANSFERABLE OPTIONSAND SARS

Section 5.05 to the contrary notwithstanding, if the Agreement provides, an Option that is not an incentive stock option or an SAR, other than a Corresponding SAR that is related to an incentive stock option, may be transferred by a Participant to the Participant’s children, grandchildren, spouse, one or more trusts for the benefit of such family members or a partnership in which such family members are the only partners, on such terms and conditions as may be permitted under Securities Exchange Commission Rule16b-3 as in effect from time to time. The holder of an Option or SAR transferred pursuant to this section shall be bound by the same terms and conditions that governed the Option or SAR during the period that it was held by the Participant; provided, however, that such transferee may not transfer the Option or SAR except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. In the event of any transfer of an Option or SAR (by the Participant or his transferee), such Option and any Corresponding SAR must be transferred to the same person or persons or entity or entities.

5.07.DIVIDEND EQUIVALENTS

A Participant will have all rights of a shareholder with respect to a Stock Award, including the right to receive dividends; provided, however, that dividends payable on shares of Common Stock subject to a Stock Award shall either (i) be deemed reinvested in additional Stock Awards which shall remain subject to the same forfeiture and transfer conditions applicable to the Stock Award with respect to which such dividends related, or (ii) be paid in cash, without interest, if and at the time the related Stock Award is no longer subject to forfeiture and transfer conditions, as the Administrator shall set forth in the Agreement. Further, notwithstanding the other provisions of this Section 5.07, no dividend rights may be granted with respect to Options or SARs. A Participant may be granted the right to receive a payment (in cash, Common Stock, or combination thereof) equal to the ordinary cash dividends that are payable with respect to the number of shares of Common Stock covered by a Stock Unit Award, subject to such terms, conditions, restrictions and/or limitations, if any, as the Administrator may establish; provided, however, such dividend equivalents shall either be (i) accumulated and reinvested into additional notional units that are payable in cash, shares of Common Stock or a combination of cash and Common Stock or (ii) accumulated and paid in cash, without interest, if and when the related Stock Unit Award is earned and convertible into a transferable and nonforfeitable Stock Award. No dividend equivalents shall be payable on a Stock Unit Award that does not become earned and convertible into a transferable and nonforfeitable Stock Award. No dividend rights or equivalents may be granted with respect to Options, SARs or Incentive Awards.

ARTICLE VI

OPTIONS AND SARS

 

6.01.AWARDS.

In accordance with Article IV, and subject to the limitations set forth in Plan Section 5.03, the Administrator will designate each individual to whom an Option, SAR or both is to be made and will specify the number of shares of Common Stock covered by such awards.

 

6.02.OPTION PRICE.

The price per share for Common Stock purchased on the exercise of an Option shall be determined by the Administrator on the date of grant; provided, however, that the price per share for Common Stock purchased on the exercise of any Option shall not be less than the Fair Market Value on the date the Option is granted. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the price per share for Common Stock purchased on the exercise of any Option that is an incentive stock option granted to an individual who is a Ten Percent Shareholder on the date such option is granted, shall not be less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value on the date the Option is granted. Except as provided in Article X, without the approval of shareholders (a) the Administrator may not reduce, adjust or amend the option price of an outstanding Option or SAR whether

through amendment, cancellation, replacement grant or any other means and (b) no payment may be made to cancel an outstanding Option if on the date of such amendment, cancellation, replacement grant or payment the option price exceeds Fair Market Value. For avoidance of doubt, in no event may the price per share for Common Stock purchased on the exercise of any Option, or the Initial Value of any SAR, be less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date the Option or SAR is granted.

 

6.03.MAXIMUM OPTIONOR SAR PERIOD.

The maximum period in which an Option or SAR may be exercised shall be determined by the Administrator on the date of grant, except that no Option or SAR shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten years from the date such Option or SAR was granted. In the case of an incentive stock option or a Corresponding SAR related to an incentive stock option granted to a Participant who is a Ten Percent Shareholder on the date of grant, such Option or its Corresponding SAR shall not be exercisable after the expiration of five years from the date of grant. The terms of any Option or SAR may provide that it is exercisable for a period less than such maximum period.

6.04.NONTRANSFERABILITY.

Except as provided in Section 6.05, any Option or SAR granted under this Plan shall be nontransferable except by will, by the laws of descent and distribution or in accordance with a beneficiary designation form provided by the Company and signed by the Participant and filed with the Company. In the event of any such transfer, the Option and any Corresponding SAR that relates to such Option must be transferred to the same person or person(s). During the lifetime of the Participant to whom the Option or SAR is granted, the Option or SAR may be exercised only by the Participant. No right or interest of a Participant in any Option or SAR shall be liable for, or subject to, any lien, obligation, or liability of such Participant.

6.05.TRANSFERABLE OPTIONSAND SARS.

Section 6.04 to the contrary notwithstanding, if the Agreement provides, an Option that is not an incentive stock option or an SAR, other than a Corresponding SAR that is related to an incentive stock option, may be transferred by a Participant to the Participant’s children, grandchildren, spouse, one or more trusts for the benefit of such family members or a partnership in which such family members are the only partners, on such terms and conditions as may be permitted under Securities Exchange Commission Rule 16b-3 as in effect from time to time. The holder of an Option or SAR transferred pursuant to this section shall be bound by the same terms and conditions that governed the Option or SAR during the period that it was held by the Participant; provided, however, that such transferee may not transfer the Option or SAR except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. In the event of any transfer of an Option or SAR (by the Participant or his transferee), such Option and any Corresponding SAR must be transferred to the same person or persons or entity or entities.

6.06.EXERCISE.

Subject to the provisions of this Plan, an Option or SAR may be exercised in whole at any time or in part from time to time at such times and in compliance with such requirements as the Administrator shall determine. No Option or SAR shall be exercisable in full sooner than three years from the date the Option or SAR is granted; provided, that an Option or SAR may be exercisable in full one year from the date the Option or SAR is granted if the Option or SAR is granted to a Nonemployee Director or the Option or SAR will become exercisable on account of the satisfaction of performance objectives (including objectives stated with respect to Performance Goals) prescribed by the Administrator. A Corresponding SAR that is related to an incentive stock option may be exercised only to the extent that the related Option is exercisable and when the Fair Market Value exceeds the Option price of the related Option. An Option or SAR granted under this Plan may be exercised with respect to any number of whole shares less than the full number for which the Option or SAR could be exercised. A partial exercise of an Option or SAR shall not affect the right to exercise the Option or SAR from time to time in accordance with this Plan and the applicable Agreement with respect to the remaining shares subject to the Option or related to the SAR. The exercise of either an Option or Corresponding SAR shall result in the termination of the other to the extent of the number of shares with respect to which the Option or Corresponding SAR is exercised.

6.07.6.05.PAYMENT.

Unless otherwise provided by the Agreement, payment of the Option price shall be made in cash or a cash equivalent acceptable to the Administrator. Subject to rules established by the Committee, payment of all or part of the Option price may be made with shares of Common Stock to the Company. If Common Stock is used to pay all or part of the Option price, the sum of the cash and cash equivalent and the Fair Market Value of the surrendered shares (on the exercise date) must not be less than the Option price of the shares for which the Option is being exercised.

 

6.08.6.06.DETERMINATIONOF PAYMENTOF CASHAND/OR COMMON STOCK UPON EXERCISEOF SAR.SAR

At the Administrator’s discretion, the amount payable as a result of the exercise of an SAR may be settled in cash, Common Stock, or a combination of cash and Common Stock. A fractional share shall not be deliverable upon the exercise of an SAR but a cash payment will be made in lieu thereof.

 

6.09.6.07.SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS.

No Participant shall have any rights as a shareholder with respect to shares subject an Option until the date of exercise of such Option.Option and the issuance of the shares of Common Stock. No Participant shall have any rights as a shareholder with respect to shares subject to an SAR until the date that the SAR is exercised and then only to the extent that the SAR is settled by the issuance of Common Stock. For avoidance of doubt, no dividend rights may be granted with respect to Options or SARs.

 

6.10.6.08.AUTOMATIC EXERCISE

This Section 6.106.08 applies to an Option or SAR if (i) the Participant to whom the Option or SAR was granted remains in the continuous employment or service of the Company or a Related Entity from the date the Option or SAR was granted until the Expiration Date of such Option or SAR, (ii) on the Expiration Date the Fair Market Value exceeds the exercise price of the Option or the Initial Value of the SAR and (iii) the Option or SAR has become exercisable on or before the Expiration Date. Each Option or SAR to which this Section 6.106.08 applies shall be exercised automatically on the Expiration Date to the extent that it is outstanding and unexercised on such date. An Option that is exercised pursuant to this Section 6.106.08 shall result in the issuance to the Participant of that number of whole shares of Common Stock that have a Fair Market Value that most nearly equals, but does not exceed, the excess of the Fair Market Value on the Expiration Date over the Option exercise price multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Option. An SAR that is exercisedexercise pursuant to this Section 6.106.08 shall be settled in accordance with section 6.08.6.06.

ARTICLE VII

STOCK AWARDS

 

7.01.AWARDS.

In accordance with the provisions of Article IV, and subject to the limitations set forth in Plan Section 5.03, the Administrator will designate each individual to whom a Stock Award is to be made and will specify the number of shares of Common Stock covered by such awards. The per individual limitation of Section 5.03 on the issuance of Stock Awards shall not limit the issuance of Stock Awards in settlement of Stock Unit Awards and related dividend equivalents.

 

7.02.VESTING.

Except in the case of Stock Awards issued in settlement of Stock Unit Awards, the Administrator, on the date of the award, shall prescribe that a Participant’s rights in the Stock Award shall be forfeitable or otherwise restricted for a period of time or subject to such conditions as may be set forth in the Agreement. By way of example and

not of limitation, the restrictions may postpone transferability, vesting or both of the shares until the attainment of performance objectives prescribed by Committee, including objectives stated with respect to Performance Goals, or may provide that the shares will be forfeited if the Participant separates from the service of the Company and its Related Entities before the expiration of a stated term. Except in the case of a Stock Award issued in settlement of a Stock Unit Award, the period of restriction until full vesting shall be at least three years, provided that the minimum period of restriction shall be at least one year in the case of a Stock Award to a Nonemployee Director or a Stock Award that will become transferable and nonforfeitable on account of the satisfaction of performance objectives, including objectives stated with respect to Performance Goals, prescribed by the Administrator.

 

7.03.SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS.

Prior to their forfeiture (in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and while the shares of Common Stock granted pursuant to the Stock Award may be forfeited), a Participant will have all rights of a shareholder with respect to a Stock Award, including the right to receive dividends and vote the shares; provided, however, that (i) dividends payable on shares of Common Stock subject to a Stock Award that does not become nonforfeitable solely onshall either be deemed reinvested in additional Stock Awards which shall remain subject to the basis of continued employmentsame forfeiture and transfer conditions applicable to the Stock Award with respect to which such dividends related, or service shall be accumulated and paid in cash, without interest, whenif and toat the extent thattime the underlyingrelated Stock Award becomes nonforfeitable,is no longer subject to forfeiture and transfer conditions, as the Administrator shall set forth in the Agreement, (ii) a Participant may not sell, transfer, pledge, exchange, hypothecate, or otherwise dispose of shares of Common Stock granted pursuant to a Stock Award, (iii) the Company shall retain custody of any certificates evidencing shares of Common Stock granted pursuant to a Stock Award, and (iv) the Participant will deliver to the Company a stock power, endorsed in blank, with respect to each Stock Award. No dividends may be paid with respect to a Stock Award that is forfeited. The limitations set forth in the preceding sentence shall not apply after the shares of Common Stock granted under the Stock Award are no longer forfeitable.

ARTICLE VIII

STOCK UNIT AWARDS

 

8.01.AWARD.

In accordance with the provisions of Article IV and subject to the limitations set forth in Section 5.03, the Administrator will designate individuals to whom a Stock Unit Award is to be granted and will specify the number of shares of Common Stock units covered by the award. The Administrator also will specify whether the Stock Unit Award includes the right to receive dividend equivalents.

 

8.02.EARNINGTHE AWARD

The Administrator, on the date of the grant of an award, shall prescribe that the Stock Unit Award, or portion thereof, will be earned, and the Participant will be entitled to receive Common Stock pursuant to a Stock

Award, a cash payment or a combination thereof, only upon the satisfaction of certain requirements. By way of example and not of limitation, the restrictions may postpone transferability, vesting or both of the Stock Unit Award until the attainment of performance objectives prescribed by the Committee, including objectives stated with respect to Performance Goals, or may provide that the Stock Unit Award will be forfeited if the Participant separates from the service of the Company and its Related Entities before the expiration of a stated term. The period for determining whether such requirements are satisfied shall be at least three years; provided that the period shall be at least one year in the case of Stock Unit Awards granted to a Nonemployee Director or a Stock Unit Award that will be earned upon the attainment of stated performance objectives or goals, including objectives stated with respect to Performance Goals.

 

8.03.PAYMENT.

In the discretion of the Administrator, the amount payable when a Stock Unit Award is earned may be settled in cash, by the grant of a Stock Award or a combination of cash and a Stock Award. A fractional share shall not be deliverable when a Stock Unit Award is earned, but a cash payment will be made in lieu thereof.

8.04.SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS.

No Participant shall, as a result of receiving a Stock Unit Award, have any rights as a shareholder until and to the extent that the Stock Unit Award is earned and a Stock Award is made. A Participant may not sell, transfer, pledge, exchange, hypothecate, or otherwise dispose of a Stock Unit Award or the right to receive Common Stock thereunder other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. After a Stock Unit Award is earned and settled by the issuance of a Stock Award is made, a Participant will have all the rights of a shareholder as described in Plan section 7.04.

 

8.05.DIVIDEND EQUIVALENTS.

The Administrator may, at the time of grant of any Stock Unit Award, include as a part of such award an entitlement to receive a payment (in cash, Common Stock, or combination thereof) equal to the ordinary cash dividends that are payable with respect to the number of shares of Common Stock covered by the award, subject to such terms, conditions, restrictions and/or limitations, if any, as the Administrator may establish. Dividendestablish; provided, however, such dividend equivalents mayshall either be paid currently or, at the Administrator’s discretion, may be(i) accumulated and reinvested into additional notional units that are payable in cash, shares of Common Stock or a combination of Cashcash and Common Stock. As determined byStock or (ii) accumulated and paid in cash, without interest, if and when the Administrator, the right to receive a dividend equivalent payment may be subject to the same vesting or performance conditions as the underlyingrelated Stock Unit Award; provided, however, thatAward is earned and convertible into a transferable and nonforfeitable Stock Award. No dividend equivalents shall be payable on a Stock Unit Award that does not become earned and convertible into a transferable and nonforfeitable solely on the basis of continued employment or service shall be accumulated and paid, without interest, when and to the extent that the underlying Stock Unit Award becomes nonforfeitable.Award.

ARTICLE IX

INCENTIVE AWARDS

 

9.01.AWARDS.

The Administrator shall designate Participants to whom Incentive Awards are made for incentive compensation opportunities. All Incentive Awards shall be finally determined exclusively by the Administrator under the procedures established by the Administrator, subject to the limitations set forth in Section 5.03.

 

9.02.TERMSAND CONDITIONS.

The Administrator, at the time an Incentive Award is made, shall specify the terms and conditions which govern the award. Such terms and conditions may include, by way of example and not of limitation, requirements that the Participant complete a specified period of employment with the Company or a Related Entity or that the Company, a Related Entity, or the Participant attain stated objectives or goals, including objectives stated with respect to Performance Goals as a condition to earning an Incentive Award. The period for determining whether such requirements are satisfied shall be at least one year.

9.03.NONTRANSFERABILITY

Incentive Awards granted under this Plan shall be nontransferable except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or in accordance with a beneficiary designation form provided by the Company and signed by the Participant and filed with the Company. No right or interest of a Participant in an Incentive Award shall be liable for, or subject to, any lien, obligation, or liability of such Participant.

 

9.04.EMPLOYEE STATUS

If the terms of an Incentive Award provide that a payment will be made thereunder only if the Participant completes a stated period of employment or continued service the Committee may decide to what extent leaves of absence for governmental or military service, illness, temporary disability or other reasons shall not be deemed interruptions of continuous employment or service.

9.05.SETTLEMENT

An Incentive Award that is earned shall be settled with a single lump sum payment which may be in cash, shares of Common stock or a combination of cash and Common Stock, as determined by the Committee.

 

9.06.SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS

No Participant shall, as a result of receiving an Incentive Award, have any rights as a shareholder of the Company until the date that the Incentive Award is settled and then only to the extent that the Incentive Award is settled by the issuance of Common Stock. For avoidance of doubt, no dividend rights may be granted with respect to Incentive Awards.

ARTICLE X

ADJUSTMENT UPON CHANGE IN COMMON STOCK

The maximum number of shares as to which Options (including incentive stock options), SARs, Stock Awards, Stock Unit Awards and Incentive Awards may be granted under this Plan, the individual grant limitations set forth in Section 5.03, and the terms of outstanding Stock Awards, Stock Unit Awards, Options, SARs, and Incentive Awards shall be adjusted as the Committee shall determine to be equitably required in the event that (a) the Company (i) effects one or more nonreciprocal transactions between the Company and its shareholders such as stock dividends, stocksplit-ups, subdivisions or consolidations of shares or extraordinary dividend (ii) engages in a transaction to which Section 424 of the Code applies or (b) there occurs any other event which, in the judgment of the Committee is equitably required. Any determination made under this Article X by the Committee shall be final and conclusive.

The issuance by the Company of shares of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, for cash or property, or for labor or services, either upon direct sale or upon the exercise of rights or warrants to subscribe therefor, or upon conversion of shares or obligations of the Company convertible into such shares or other securities, shall not affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the maximum number of shares as to which Options, SARs, Stock Awards, Stock Unit Awards and Incentive Awards may be granted, the terms of outstanding Stock Unit Awards, Stock Awards, Options, SARs, or Incentive Awards, or the individual limitations set forth in Section 5.03.

The Committee may grant Stock Awards, Stock Unit Awards, Options, and SARs in substitution for performance shares, phantom shares, stock awards, stock options, stock appreciation rights, or similar awards held by an individual who becomes an employee of the Company or a Related Entity in connection with a transaction described in the first paragraph of this Article X. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, the terms of such substituted Stock Unit Awards, Stock Awards, Option or SAR grants shall be as the Committee, in its discretion, determines is appropriate.

ARTICLE XI

CHANGE IN CONTROL

 

11.01.IMPACTOF CHANGEIN CONTROL.

Unless an outstanding award is assumed in accordance with Section 11.02 and Sections 6.06, 7.02, 8.02 and 9.02Article III to the contrary notwithstanding, upon a Control Change Date andcash-out of the Committee is authorized to provide thataward in accordance with Section 11.03, (i) an Option and SAR shall be fully exercisable thereafter, (ii) a Stock Award will become transferable and nonforfeitable thereafter, (iii) a Stock Unit Award shall be earned in its entirety and converted into a transferable and nonforfeitable Stock Award, and (iv) an Incentive Award shall be earned, in whole or in part, in accordance with the terms of the applicable Agreement.

Agreement, except that (i) a performance-based Option and SAR shall be exercisable thereafter, (ii) a performance-based Stock Award will become transferable and nonforfeitable thereafter, (iii) a performance-based Stock Unit Award will be earned and converted into a transferable and nonforfeitable Stock Award, and (iv) a performance-based Incentive Award shall be earned, in accordance with the terms of the applicable Agreement, only to the extent of actual performance through the Control Change Date or pro rata based on the elapsed portion of the performance period as of the Control Change Date, whichever the Committee determines.

11.02.ASSUMPTION UPON CHANGEIN CONTROL.

In the event of a Change in Control the Committee, in its discretion and without the need for a Participant’s consent, may provide that an outstanding Option, SAR, Stock Award, Stock Unit Award or Incentive Award shall be assumed by, or a substitute award granted by, the surviving entity in the Change in Control. Such assumed or substituted award shall be of the same type of award as the original Option, SAR, Stock Award, Stock Unit Award or Incentive Award being assumed or substituted. The assumed or substituted award shall have a value, as of the Control Change Date, that is substantially equal to the value of the original award (or the difference between the Fair Market Value and the option price or Initial Value in the case of Options and SARs) as the Committee determines is equitably required and such other terms and conditions as may be prescribed by the Committee.

 

11.03.CASH-OUT UPON CHANGEIN CONTROL.

Unless an outstanding award is assumed in accordance with Section 11.02 and Sections 6.06,6.04, 7.02, 8.02 and 9.02 to the contrary notwithstanding, in the event of a Change in Control, the Committee, in its discretion and without the need of a Participant’s consent, may provide that (i) each Option and SAR that is or will be exercisable on the Control Change Date, (ii) each Stock Award that is or will become transferable and nonforfeitable on the Control Change Date, (iii) each Stock Unit Award that is or will be earned and convertible into a transferable and nonforfeitable Stock Award on the Control Change Date and (iv) each Inventive Award that is or will be earned at the Control Change Date shall be cancelled in exchange for a payment. The payment may be in cash, shares of Common Stock or other securities or consideration received by Company shareholders in the Change in Control transaction. The amount of the payment shall be an amount that is substantially equal to (i) the amount by which the price per share received by Company shareholders in the Change in Control exceeds the Option price or Initial Value in the case of an Option and SAR for each share of Common Stock subject to an Option or SAR, or (ii) the price per share received by shareholders for each share of Common Stock subject to a Stock Award or Stock Unit Award or (iii) the amount earned under the Incentive Award. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, (i) each Option and SAR that is not and will not become exercisable on the Control Change Date, (ii) each Stock Award that is not and will not become transferable and nonforfeitable on the Control Change Date, (iii) each Stock Unit Award that is not and will not be earned and convertible into a transferable and nonforfeitable Stock Award on the Control Change Date and (iv) each Incentive Award that is not and will not become earned at the Control Change Date, shall be cancelled without any payment therefor.

ARTICLE XII

COMPLIANCE WITH LAW AND APPROVAL OF REGULATORY BODIES

No Option or SAR shall be exercisable, no Common Stock shall be issued, no certificates for shares of Common Stock shall be delivered, and no payment shall be made under this Plan except in compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations (including, without limitation, withholding tax requirements), any listing agreement to which the Company is a party, and the rules of all domestic stock exchanges on which the Company’s shares may be listed. The Company shall have the right to rely on an opinion of its counsel as to such compliance. Any share certificate issued to evidence Common Stock when a Stock Award is granted or for which an Option or SAR is exercised may bear such legends and statements as the Administrator may deem advisable to assure compliance with federal and state laws and regulations. No Option or SAR shall be exercisable, no Stock Award shall be granted, no Common Stock shall be issued, no certificate for shares shall be delivered, and no payment shall be made under this Plan until the Company has obtained such consent or approval as the Administrator may deem advisable from regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over such matters.

ARTICLE XIII

GENERAL PROVISIONS

 

13.01.EFFECTON EMPLOYMENTOR SERVICE.

Neither the adoption of this Plan, its operation, nor any documents describing or referring to this Plan (or any part thereof) shall confer upon any individual any right to continue in the employ or service of the Company or a Related Entity or in any way affect any right and power of the Company or a Related Entity to terminate the employment or service of any individual at any time with or without assigning a reason therefor.

 

13.02.UNFUNDED PLAN.

The Plan, insofar as it provides for grants, shall be unfunded, and the Company shall not be required to segregate any assets that may at any time be represented by grants under this Plan. Any liability of the Company to any

person with respect to any grant under this Plan shall be based solely upon any contractual obligations that may be created pursuant to this Plan. No such obligation of the Company shall be deemed to be secured by any pledge of, or other encumbrance on, any property of the Company.

 

13.03.DISPOSITIONOF STOCK.

A Participant shall notify the Administrator of any sale or other disposition of Common Stock acquired pursuant to an Option that was an incentive stock option if such sale or disposition occurs (i) within two years of the grant of an Option or (ii) within one year of the issuance of the Common Stock to the Participant. Such notice shall be in writing and directed to the Secretary of the Company.

 

13.04.RULESOF CONSTRUCTION.

Headings are given to the articles and sections of this Plan solely as a convenience to facilitate reference. The reference to any statute, regulation, or other provision of law shall be construed to refer to any amendment to or successor of such provision of law.

All awards made under this Plan are intended to comply with, or otherwise be exempt from, Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”), after giving effect to the exemptions in Treasury Regulation sections1.409A-1(b)(3) through (b)(12). This Plan and all Agreements shall be administered, interpreted and construed in a manner consistent with Section 409A. If any provision of this Plan or any Agreement is found not to comply with, or otherwise not be exempt from, the provisions of Section 409A, it shall be modified and given effect, in

the sole discretion of the Committee and without requiring the Participant’s consent, in such manner as the Committee determines to be necessary or appropriate to comply with, or effectuate an exemption from, Section 409A. Each payment under an award granted under this Plan shall be treated as a separate identified payment for purposes of Section 409A.

If a payment obligation under an award or an Agreement arises on account of the Participant’s termination of employment and such payment obligation constitutes “deferred compensation” (as defined under Treasury Regulation section1.409A-1(b)(1), after giving effect to the exemptions in Treasury Regulation sections1.409A-1(b)(3) through (b))12)), it shall be payable only after the Participant’s “separation from service” (as defined under Treasury Regulation section1.409A-1(h)); provided, however, that if the Participant is a “specified employee” (as defined under Treasury Regulation section1.409A-1(i)), any such payment that is scheduled to be paid within six months after such separation from service shall accrue without interest and shall be paid on the first day of the seventh month beginning after the date of the Participant’s separation from service or, if earlier, within fifteen days after the appointment of the personal representative or executor of the Participant’s estate following the Participant’s death.

 

13.05.EMPLOYEE STATUS.

In the event that the terms of any Stock Award, Stock Unit Award or Incentive Award or the grant of any Option or SAR provide that shares may be issued or become transferable and nonforfeitable thereunder only after completion of a specified period of employment or service, the Administrator may decide in each case to what extent leaves of absence for governmental or military service, illness, temporary disability, or other reasons shall not be deemed interruptions of continuous employment or service.

 

13.06.WITHHOLDING TAXES.

Each Participant shall be responsible for satisfying any income and employment tax withholding obligations attributable to participation in the Plan. Unless otherwise provided by the Agreement, any such withholding tax obligations may be satisfied in cash (including from any cash payable in settlement of a Stock Unit Award, an SAR or Incentive Award) or a cash equivalent acceptable to the Committee. Except to the extent prohibited by Treasury RegulationSection 1.409A-3(j), any withholding tax obligations may also be satisfied by surrendering

shares of Common Stock to the Company, by withholding or reducing the number of shares of Common Stock otherwise issuable to the Participant upon the exercise of an Option or SAR, the settlement of a Stock Unit Award or Incentive Award or the grant or vesting of a Stock Award, but only up to the minimum required tax withholding rate that will not result in adverse financial accounting consequences with respect to such awards, or by any other method as may be approved by the Committee. If shares of Common Stock are used to pay all or part of such withholding tax obligation, the Fair Market Value of the shares surrendered, withheld or reduced shall be determined as of the date the Option or SAR is exercised, the Stock Award vests or the Stock Unit Award or Incentive Award is earned, as applicable.

 

13.07.CERTAIN REDUCTIONOF PARACHUTE PAYMENTS

The benefits that a Participant may be entitled to receive under this Plan and other benefits that a Participant is entitled to receive under other plans, agreements and arrangements (which, together with the benefits provided under this Plan, are referred to as “Payments”), may constitute Parachute Payments that are subject to Code Sections 280G and 4999. As provided in this Section 13.07, the Parachute Payments will be reduced pursuant to this Section 13.07 if, and only to the extent that, a reduction will allow a Participant to receive a greater Net After Tax Amount than a Participant would receive absent a reduction.

The Accounting Firm will first determine the amount of any Parachute Payments that are payable to a Participant. The Accounting Firm also will determine the Net After Tax Amount attributable to the Participant’s total Parachute Payments.

The Accounting Firm will next determine the largest amount of Payments that may be made to the Participant without subjecting the Participant to tax under Code Section 4999 (the “Capped Payments”). Thereafter, the Accounting Firm will determine the Net After Tax Amount attributable to the Capped Payments.

The Participant will receive the total Parachute Payments or the Capped Payments, whichever provides the Participant with the higher Net After Tax Amount. If the Participant will receive the Capped Payments, the total Parachute Payments will be adjusted by first reducing the amount of any benefits under this Plan or any other plan, agreement or arrangement that are not subject to Section 409A of the Code (with the source of the reduction to be directed by the Committee) and then by reducing the amount of any benefits under this Plan or any other plan, agreement or arrangement that are subject to Section 409A of the Code (with the source of the reduction to be directed by the Committee) in a manner that results in the best economic benefit to the Participant (or, to the extent economically equivalent, in a pro rata manner). The Accounting Firm will notify the Participant and the Company if it determines that the Parachute Payments must be reduced to the Capped Payments and will send the Participant and the Company a copy of its detailed calculations supporting that determination.

As a result of the uncertainty in the application of Code Sections 280G and 4999 at the time that the Accounting Firm makes its determinations under this Article XV, it is possible that amounts will have been paid or distributed to the Participant that should not have been paid or distributed under this Section 13.07 (“Overpayments”), or that additional amounts should be paid or distributed to the Participant under this Section 13.07 (“Underpayments”). If the Accounting Firm determines, based on either the assertion of a deficiency by the Internal Revenue Service against the Company or the Participant, which assertion the Accounting Firm believes has a high probability of success or controlling precedent or substantial authority, that an Overpayment has been made, the Participant must repay to the Company, without interest; provided, however, that no loan will be deemed to have been made and no amount will be payable by the Participant to the Company unless, and then only to the extent that, the deemed loan and payment would either reduce the amount on which the Participant is subject to tax under Code Section 4999 or generate a refund of tax imposed under Code Section 4999. If the Accounting Firm determines, based upon controlling precedent or substantial authority, that an Underpayment has occurred, the Accounting Firm will notify the Participant and the Company of that determination and the amount of that Underpayment will be paid to the Participant promptly by the Company.

For purposes of this Section 13.07, the term “Accounting Firm” means the independent accounting firm engaged by the Company immediately before the Control Change Date. For purposes of this Section 13.07, the term “Net

After Tax Amount” means the amount of any Parachute Payments or Capped Payments, as applicable, net of taxes imposed under Code Sections 1, 3101(b) and 4999 and any State or local income taxes applicable to the Participant on the date of payment. The determination of the Net After Tax Amount shall be made using the highest combined effective rate imposed by the foregoing taxes on income of the same character as the Parachute Payments or Capped Payments, as applicable, in effect on the date of payment. For purposes of this Section 13.07, the term “Parachute Payment” means a payment that is described in Code Section 280G(b)(2), determined in accordance with Code Section 280G and the regulations promulgated or proposed thereunder.

Nothing in this Section 13.07 shall limit or otherwise supersede the provisions of any other agreement or plan which provides that a Participant cannot receive Payments in excess of the Capped Payments.

 

13.08.RETURNOF AWARDS; REPAYMENT.

Each Stock Award, Option, SAR, Stock Unit Award and Incentive Award granted under this Plan is subject to the condition that the Company may require that such award be returned, and that any payment made with respect to such award must be repaid, if such action is required under the terms of any Company recoupment or “clawback” policy as in effect on the date that the payment was made, on the date the award was granted or the date the Option or SAR was exercised or the date the Stock Award, Stock Unit Award or Incentive Award became vested or earned.

13.09.DEFERRALOF AWARDS

The Committee may permit a Participant to defer, or if and to the extent specified in an Agreement require the Participant to defer, receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of shares of Common Stock that would otherwise be due by virtue of the lapse or waiver of restrictions with respect to awards, the satisfaction of any requirements or goals with respect to awards, the lapse or waiver of the deferral period for awards, or the lapse or waiver of restrictions with respect to awards. If the Committee permits such deferrals, the Committee shall establish rules and procedures for making such deferral elections and for the payment of such deferrals, which shall be intended to conform in form and substance with applicable regulations promulgated under Section 409A of the Code and Section 13.04. Except as otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, any payment or any shares of Common Stock that are subject to such deferral shall be made or delivered to the Participant as specified in the Agreement or pursuant to the Participant’s deferral election.

13.10.EXTENSIONOF TERMOF AWARD

Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan providing for the maximum term of an award, in the event any award would expire prior to exercise, vesting or settlement because trading in shares of Common Stock is prohibited by law or by any insider trading policy of the Company, the Committee may extend the term of the award (or provide for such in the applicable Agreement) until thirty (30) days after the expiration of any such prohibitions to permit the Participant to realize the value of the award, provided such extension (i) is permitted by law, (ii) does not violate Section 409A of the Code with respect to any award, and (iii) does not otherwise adversely impact the tax consequences of the award (such as incentive stock options and related awards).

13.11.SECTION 162(m) TRANSITION RULE

Subject to Article XIV below, if and to the extent that the Committee grants an award under the Plan in substitution for an award intended to constitute “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, as in effect prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, then such award shall be (i) subject to such terms and conditions as are required for the award to continue to qualify under the transition rule for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, as the Committee shall determine, (ii) the award will be administered by asub-committee of the Committee which is comprised of two or more members that qualify as “outside directors” under Section 162(m) of the Code prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, and (iii) none of the provisions of the Plan shall apply to such award to the extent such provisions would result in the award no longer qualifying under the transition rule for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

ARTICLE XIV

AMENDMENT

The Board may amend or terminate this Plan from time to time; provided, however, that no amendment may become effective until shareholder approval is obtained if (i) the amendment materially increases the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan (other than an adjustment pursuant to Article X), (ii) the amendment materially increases the benefits accruing to Participants under the Plan, (iii) the amendment materially changes the class of individuals eligible to become Participants or (iv) the amendment is required to be approved by shareholders by the requirements of applicable law or under the New York Stock Exchange’s shareholder approval rules. For the avoidance of doubt, the Board may not (except pursuant to Article X) without the approval of shareholders (a) reduce the option price per share of an outstanding Option or the Initial Value of an outstanding SAR, (b) cancel an outstanding Option or outstanding SAR when the option price or Initial Value, as applicable exceeds the Fair Market Value (whether in exchange for (i) other Options or SARs with option prices or Initial Values, as applicable, that are less than the option prices or Initial Values of the cancelled Options or SARs, (ii) cash payments, (iii) shares of Common Stock, or

(iv) other awards) or (c) take any other action with respect to an outstanding Option or an outstanding SAR that may be treated as a repricing of the award under the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange. No amendment shall, without a Participant’s consent, adversely affect any rights of such Participant under any outstanding award of Performance Shares, or under any Stock Award, Option or SAR outstanding at the time such amendment is made.

ARTICLE XV

DURATION OF PLAN

No Stock Award, Stock Unit Award, Option, SAR or Incentive Award may be granted under this Plan after April 29, 2025; and any Option granted after February 4, 2025 shall not be an incentive stock option under Section 422the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Code.date the Board adopted the Plan. Awards granted on or before such April 29, 2025date shall remain subject to their terms notwithstanding the expiration of the Plan.

ARTICLE XVI

EFFECTIVE DATE OF PLAN

Stock Awards, Stock Unit Awards, Options, SARs and Incentive Awards may be granted under this Plan upon its approvalon and after the date the Board adopts the Plan; provided, however, Stock Awards may only be granted after, and no award granted under the Plan may become exercisable, transferable and nonforfeitable, payable or settled until, the Plan is approved by a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the Company’s shareholders, voting either in person or by proxy, at a duly held shareholders’ meeting within twelve (12) months of its adoption by the Board.

Appendix B

AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND

PROCEDURES FOR SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT

AUDITORS

Services subject to Audit Committee Approval

(1)General. The Audit Committee must approve in advance all audit and non-audit services provided by the Company’s independent auditors to ensure the services do not impair the auditor’s independence. Unless a type of service to be provided by the independent auditor has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding pre- approved cost levels will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

(2)Prohibited Services. The Company may not engage its independent auditors to perform any services as may, from time to time, be prohibited by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any securities exchange on which the Company’s securities are traded or listed, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or any other regulatory bodies. Prohibited services include, but may not be limited to, bookkeeping, financial information systems design and implementation, appraisals or valuations (other than tax), fairness opinions, actuarial services, internal audit outsourcing, management functions, human resources, broker-dealer services, legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit.

(3)Audit Services. The Audit Committee shall pre-approve the annual audit services engagement terms and fees and, as necessary, any change in terms, conditions and fees resulting from change in audit scope, Company structure or other matters.

(4)Audit-Related Services. The Audit Committee shall pre-approve each year certain audit-related services that may be performed by the independent auditors up to the pre-approved fee levels. Audit- related services are services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Company’s financial statements but that do not impair the auditor’s independence and may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:

(a)audits of employee benefit plans;

(b)consultation on accounting matters, including reviews of significant contracts;

(c)assistance with inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulatory bodies;

(d)assistance with debt, equity and other financing transactions, including issuing comfort letters; and

(e)accounting and auditing assistance in connection with merger and acquisition activity.

(5)Tax and Other Services. The Audit Committee may pre-approve the provision by the independent auditor to the Company of certain tax services that do not impair the independence of the auditor, such as tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice. The Audit Committee will not permit engagement of the independent auditor in connection with a transaction whose sole purpose is tax avoidance, to perform services under contingent fee arrangements or for services prohibited as set forth in Section (2) above. In addition, the Audit Committee may pre-approve other non-audit services that it believes would not impair the independence of the auditor and that are not prohibited as set forth in Section (2) above.

Approval Process

(1)On an annual basis, the Audit Committee will pre-approve engagement of the independent auditors for audit services and applicable non-audit services.

(2)On an annual basis, the Audit Committee will pre-approve a total annual dollar budget for audit-related services and may approve a total annual dollar budget for tax and/or other specified services.(3) The Audit Committee shall be required to pre-approve from time to time, as required, any services or additional budget amounts needed for services beyond what was originally pre-approved by the committee pursuant to Section (1) or (2) above.

(4)The pre-approval requirement herein may be waived with respect to non-audit services under the following circumstances:

(a)the aggregate amount of such services constitutes no more than five percent of the total amount of revenues paid by the Company to the independent auditor during the fiscal year in which the services are provided;

(b)such services were not recognized by the Company at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and

(c)such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Audit Committee and approved prior to the completion of the audit by the Audit Committee or the chairman of the Audit Committee (to whom authority to grant such approvals is hereby expressly delegated).

(5)The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated shall report any pre-approval decision to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Directions to

Owens & Minor, Inc. Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Thursday, April 30, 2015Tuesday, May 8, 201810:9:00 a.m.A.M. EDT

at

Owens & Minor, Inc. Corporate HeadquartersThe Jefferson Hotel

9120 Lockwood Blvd.Empire Room

Mechanicsville,101 West Franklin Street

Richmond, Virginia, 23116

LOGO23220

From Washington, D.C., followI-95 South to I-295 South via Exit 84A and take Exit 41A/US-301.76B towardsUS-1/US-301/Belvidere Street. Turn left onto W Leigh Street, then right onto N Belvidere Street. Turn left onto W Franklin Street. Turn right onto N Jefferson Street.

From Petersburg, followI-95 North to I-295 North via Exit 4674A/I-195 N/Downtown Expressway; continue toVA-195 W and take Exit 41A/US-301.exit towardUS-1/US-301/Belvidere Street. Merge onto Canal Street. Turn right onto S Jefferson Street. Turn left onto W Main Street. Turn right onto N Madison Street. Turn right onto W Franklin Street. Turn right onto N Jefferson Street.

From Charlottesville, followI-64 East to I-295 South via Exit 177 and take Exit 41A/US-301.76B towardsUS-1/US-301/Belvidere Street. Turn left onto W Leigh Street, then right onto N Belvidere Street. Turn left onto W Franklin Street. Turn right onto N Jefferson Street.

From Norfolk, followI-64 West to I-295 North and take Exit 41A/US-301.76A/Chamberlayne Ave. Travel South on Chamberlayne Parkway, slight right onto N Adams Street. Turn right onto W Grace Street. Turn left onto N Jefferson Street.

From the Airport, departing from the airport, bear right at Airport Drive. Continue on Airport Drive (passing the entrance to I-64) to the I-295I-64 West ramp heading toward Charlottesville. Merge onto I-295 North and travel about 10 miles.Richmond. Take Exit 41A/US-301.

From ALL directions, travel North76A/Chamberlayne Ave. Travel South on US-301 to the first light.Chamberlayne Parkway, slight right onto N Adams Street. Turn right onto Lockwood Boulevard.W Grace Street. Turn left onto N Jefferson Street.


LOGO

LOGO

IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

Electronic Voting Instructions

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, April 29, 2015.

Vote by Internet

•  Go towww.envisionreports.com/OMI

•  Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

•  Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

Vote by telephone

x

 •   Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone

Using ablack inkpen, mark your votes with anXas shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.

 •   Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message

 

LOGO

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q

IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION
Electronic Voting Instructions
Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!
Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.
VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.
Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, May 7, 2018.
Vote by Internet
• Go to www.envisionreports.com/OMI
• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone
• Follow the steps outlined on the secure website
Vote by telephone
• Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone
• Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.
Annual Meeting Proxy Card
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4.
1. Election of Directors:
For Against Abstain
01 - Stuart M. Essig
04 - Lemuel E. Lewis
07 - Eddie N. Moore, Jr.
10 - Anne Marie Whittemore
02 - John W. Gerdelman
05 - Martha H. Marsh
08 - P. Cody Phipps
For Against Abstain
03 - Barbara B. Hill
06 - Mark F. McGettrick
09 - Robert C. Sledd
For Against Abstain
2. Vote to approve the Owens & Minor, Inc. 2018 Stock Incentive Plan.
For Against Abstain
3. Vote to ratify KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent public accounting firm for 2018.
For Against Abstain
For Against Abstain
4. Advisory vote to approve executive compensation.
B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below
 A 

Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 through 4.
1.Election of Directors:ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstainLOGO
01 - James L. Bierman

¨

¨

¨

02 - Stuart M. Essig

¨

¨

¨

03 - John W. Gerdelman

¨

¨

¨

04 - Lemuel E. Lewis¨¨¨05 - Martha H. Marsh¨¨¨06 - Eddie N. Moore, Jr.¨¨¨
07 - James E. Rogers¨¨¨08 - David S. Simmons¨¨¨09 - Robert C. Sledd¨¨¨
10 - Craig R. Smith¨¨¨11 - Anne Marie Whittemore¨¨¨
ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain
2.

Vote to approve the proposed Owens & Minor, Inc. 2015 Stock Incentive Plan.

¨¨¨      4. Advisory vote on executive compensation.¨¨¨
3.Vote to ratify KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent public accounting firm for 2015.¨¨¨

 B 

Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.

Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

                    /             /


Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - CAND B ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.

1UP X
02SMVC


LOGO

 

LOGO


2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Owens & Minor, Inc.
May 8, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. The Jefferson Hotel 101 West Franklin Street Richmond, Virginia 23220
Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Owens & Minor, Inc. 20152018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The 20152018 Proxy Statement and the 20142017 Annual Report/Form 10-K to Shareholders are available at:www.envisionreports.com/OMI


IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.  q

LOGOLOGO


Proxy — Owens & Minor, Inc.


ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS - APRIL 30, 2015

– MAY 8, 2018
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY

The undersigned hereby appoints Martha H. Marsh,Lemuel E. Lewis, Robert C. Sledd, and David S. Simmons,Anne Marie Whittemore, and each of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side, all the shares of Owens & Minor, Inc. Common Stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Owens & Minor, Inc. to be held April 30, 2015,May 8, 2018, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the meeting.

If this proxy is executed, but no instructions are made, this proxy card will be voted “FOR” each of the director nominees, “FOR” Proposals 2, 3 and 4 and otherwise in the discretion of the proxies upon such other business as properly comes before the annual meeting.
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)
C Non-Voting Items
Change of Address — Please print your new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below.
Meeting Attendance
Mark the box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.
IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A AND B ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.


LOGO

 

 C 

IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.
Annual Meeting Proxy Card
PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4.
1. Election of Directors: For Against Abstain
01 - Stuart M. Essig
04 - Lemuel E. Lewis
07 - Eddie N. Moore, Jr.
10 - Anne Marie Whittemore
For Against Abstain
02 - John W. Gerdelman
05 - Martha H. Marsh
08 - P. Cody Phipps
For Against Abstain
03 - Barbara B. Hill
06 - Mark F. McGettrick
09 - Robert C. Sledd
2. Vote to approve the Owens & Minor, Inc. 2018 Stock Incentive Plan.
For Against Abstain
3. Vote to ratify KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent public accounting firm for 2018.
For Against Abstain
4. Advisory vote to approve executive compensation.
For Against Abstain
B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below
NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
1UP X
02SMWC


LOGO

Non-Voting Items

Change of Address — Please print new address below.

Comments — Please print your comments below.

 

LOGO2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Owens & Minor, Inc.
May 8, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. The Jefferson Hotel 101 West Franklin Street Richmond, Virginia 23220
Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Owens & Minor, Inc. 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The 2018 Proxy Statement and the 2017 Annual Report/Form 10-K to Shareholders are available at: www.edocumentview.com/OMI
PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Proxy — Owens & Minor, Inc.
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS – MAY 8, 2018
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY
The undersigned hereby appoints Lemuel E. Lewis, Robert C. Sledd, and Anne Marie Whittemore, and each of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side, all the shares of Owens & Minor, Inc. Common Stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Owens & Minor, Inc. to be held May 8, 2018, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the meeting.
If this proxy is executed, but no instructions are made, this proxy card will be voted “FOR” each of the director nominees, “FOR” Proposals 2, 3 and 4 and otherwise in the discretion of the proxies upon such other business as properly comes before the annual meeting.
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)